Thursday, May 09, 2019

Seeking Arrangement Might Just Burst the College Bubble

There are THREE WARNINGS for this article.
1.  This article contains links and discussion about porn and pornographic sites. You have been warned.
2.  This article is also written from a cold, clinical, empiricist economic viewpoint absent of any human emotion which you will find more insulting.  You have also been warned. 
3.  This article is about a solid 45 minute read.  It's not for those of you with the attention span of goldfish or millennials.  Be careful reading it.  Your intellect might be stimulated

"Ole Man Clarey's" Ignorance of Tentacle Porn

Like every red-blooded man on the planet, I have looked at porn on the internet.  Anybody who tells you any different is a liar.  And, like every red-blooded man on the planet, I have also had a microscopic tinge of shame in this fact.  However, I earned myself a bit of a reprieve listening to a podcast-colleague of mine, Chris Bechtloff.

Since Chris and his co-hosts are friends/colleagues of mine, he and his co-hosts occasionally give me guff on the show.  They laugh and guffaw at "Ole Man Clarey" and his quaint, outdated Gen X's ways.  So when they found out I had no idea what on god's green Earth "tentacle porn" was, they could not rush me the links fast enough to this whole new world of depravity I wish I had never found out existed.  Traumatizing as "tentacle porn" was, however, it did make me feel a hell of a lot better about my comparably-pure-as-the-driven-snow porn tastes.  Good ole fashioned American "big tits, long legs, and lingerie" is almost saintly compared to some of the darker "Bechtloffian" niches of the porn world, and so whatever microscopic tinge of guilt I once had was now fully erased by those dagnabbit millennials and their warped, depraved porn habits.

But "tentacle porn" was not the most eye-opening of the sites they sent me to.  Matter of fact, not by a long shot.  For while "tentacle porn" is truly bizarre and disturbing, it is in actuality cartoon porn (don't ask), not involving actual, real, live humans.  And me being the libertarian I am, who am I to judge people's porn preferences?  If people want to watch cartoon, Japanese "tentacle porn," let them.  They're not hurting anybody.  No crime, no foul.

Enter in ""


"" is simply a pornographic web-cam site.  I can say "simply" now because now I know what a "web-cam site" actually is.  But at the time I had no idea and didn't even understand the concept of it.  Regardless, a web cam site is essentially an online strip club where girls will perform pretty much every possible, conceivable sexual act online, taking tips and donations from virtual strip-club goers.  It's streamed live through women's web-cams and men can throw money at them all day, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year from around the globe.

Unlike Japanese, cartoon, tentacle porn, these girls are very real.  And the sex acts they perform are also very real.  But even more real than that is the absurd amounts of money both Chaturbate Inc and these "digital strippers" make.  There are no industrial classification codes at the BEA, but your average webcam girl can make anywhere between $50-$100 an hour - more than an engineering major is going to make fresh out of college (perhaps more in line with what a surgeon makes).  However, because a girl can't be "camming" 24-7 this pro-rates out to more like $1,000-$4,000 a month, translating into either rent money or a modest salary most people can live on (though some of the top webcam models make $50K a month or more).

But what I found most fascinating about Chaturbate was the ruthless economics of this business model - both for the strip club industry, as well as its webcam girls themselves.  First, it has completely obsoleted the brick and mortar strip club.  You no longer need the capital investment costs of a building, stage, stripper pole, cocktail bar, even furniture.  You just need some servers and some web design.  The "stage" is the room that the web cam girl decides to set up in.  Second, you don't need staff or a bouncer either to serve the attendees drinks or to kick them out.  This lowers eliminates labor, as well as insurance costs, allowing for more profit to be divvied up between Chaturbate Inc and the strippers.  Third, the women themselves needn't suffer the physical presence of strip club goers.  It's safer, cleaner, more hygienic, and I'm sure a lot less mentally taxing than grinding against random guys you don't like and don't care about for hours on end.  Fourth, girls get to "telecommute."  I know perhaps this isn't a main selling point for strippers/web-cam girls, but it is a convenience you can just plug in a web cam and go, instead of having to drive down to a shady part of town and worry about some stalker following you out to your car.  Finally, supply and demand is 59% global.  You might ask "what do you mean 59% global?"  And what I mean by that is 59% of the world's population has access to the internet, meaning both men (demanders) and women (suppliers) can be entering this market 24-7.  This means instead of just having 3-4 strippers on a stage at any given time, you can have THOUSANDS of women globally "stripping" at one time.  Also, of particular benefit to women, instead of only having the legal fire-code building capacity of a strip club (say 200 people) you have (in theory) 2.2 BILLION men in this strip club (all the men who have access to the internet).  This not only means more tippers, but multiple tippers at one time as you are not performing a lap dance for any one man (thus prohibiting you from giving a lap dance to another) and can serve multiple, even hundreds of men at the same time.  This can translate into hundreds, even thousands of dollars an hour in theory.

In nearly every way Chaturbate is superior to strip clubs and stripping.  It's more profitable.  It's easier to set up (both for strippers and Chaturbate Inc).  It's safer for the girls.  Cleaner.  And infinitely more convenient for both the web cam models as well as the "digital strip club goers."  As an economist I find Chaturbate fascinating.  And I do mean that from an economic, philosophical, and entrepreneurial perspective, not a pornographic one.  Chaturbate is truly an amazing case study in business, economics, technology, and entrepreneurship.

But there was something else about Chaturbate that made my economic spidey senses tingle  And I actually took the time to grab a piece of paper and a pen.  And as I doodled, took notes, and put onto paper the ill-defined epiphany that was trying to get out of my mind, I realized that Chaturbate was much more than that.

Dear god almighty.  Much, much more than that.

And the ramifications go well beyond the strip club industry.

The Most Valuable Commodity in the World

To understand the full ramifications of Chaturbate and Chaturbate-like sites we need a critical lesson in economics that is never taught in schools.  I say "never taught in schools" because I am the only one to unearth this critical lesson and I have yet to teach it in any school.  Furthermore, it's truthful, which means it's politically incorrect, which means even if economics professors knew of this lesson, they wouldn't teach it because, well, truth and reality have no place in today's colleges and universities.  And that lesson is...

Female youth and beauty is the most valuable commodity in the world.

I'll say that again in case you didn't hear me the first time.

Female youth and beauty is the most valuable commodity in the world.

I've pointed this epiphany out before, and I'll point it out again, but what drives this world and has driven it since the dawn of time is not:

Slave labor, or

It is, without a doubt, female youth and beauty.

Don't believe me?

Look at what men have both created and destroyed to have access to women.

Men (whether you like it or not) have single-handedly built civilization.  We build buildings, roads, aqueducts, bridges, and forges all so we can get a beautiful, young woman.  We've built cars, planes, trains, automobiles, buses, engines (diesel, regular, solar, electric, even nuclear), boats, barges, helicopters and space shuttles all so we can get a beautiful, young woman.  We've unlocked the secrets of chemistry, physics, nuclear science, electricity, biology, neurology, medicine, and metallurgy all so we can get a beautiful, young woman.  And we build companies, magnates, industrial combines and empires, even destroying them via wars, all because - when you boil it down - we want young, beautiful women.  Female youth and beauty is merely the fuel that powers the male economic engine that has built and created (and destroyed at times) pretty much EVERYTHING in this world.

If you still don't believe me, let me ask you - what do young men today spend the majority of their time on?  It is the pursuit of women.  Going to the gym, going to the tailor, dieting, running marathons, going to the bars, going to night clubs, dating sites, swiping left, swiping right - all the pursuit of women.  Our work and studying, where we slave away for decades, first at school, then at work, is not so much that we can have great, well-paying careers, but rather that we can get women.  And the stuff we buy with our well-paying careers we don't even spend on ourselves as it is the sports cars,  overpriced-McMansions, stupid ass clothes, useless jewelry, granite countertops, and European vacation we use to woo women.  Even the loser men of society, who seemingly are not participating in the rat-race-pursuit of women, still pursue women in a metaphorical sense.  It's just instead of going to the gym, getting a STEM degree, a good career, and financial success, they opt instead to look at porn in their parents' basement.

Porn of what?

Fat women?
Old women?
Fat old, tatted up, pierced women with gray hair and a Masters Degree in Social Work?


The porn of young, beautiful women.

If women did not exist men truly would just be living in caves, occasionally going out to hunt for food and at best, AT BEST, some creative cave man might have created poker along the way just so we'd have something to do inside the cave during downtime.

The larger point is since men have built civilization, created and discovered nearly everything, and work harder and in harder subjects, we earn and make the lion's share of the world's income, giving us the most purchasing power in the world.  And the number one thing we demand is female youth and beauty, making female youth and beauty the most sought after, and thus most expensive commodity on the planet.  Thus while:

a barrel of oil costs $69
a cord of wood, $150.
and a ton of steel costs $730

NONE OF THOSE THINGS even comes close to the resources (both in terms of time and money) men spend on:

A wedding ring,
An unnecessary SUV.
An unnecessary McMansion men don't need
Bailing a wife out of her student loans
Decades out in the night clubs
Decades going out on and paying for hundreds of dates
A sports car to "pick up chicks"

And if you still don't think female youth and beauty are the most expensive commodity in the world...

...just ask Jeff Bezos what he ended up paying for his first wife.

So say it with me now - "Female youth and beauty is the most valuable commodity in the world because the world simply would not exist without it."

Converting Beauty into Money

The problem facing women in the past was how to convert or "cash in" on their youth and beauty.  Traditionally, and across all cultures, this was done through marriage.  The "social contract" was that women would provide men their love, affection, support, and sexual access, raise the kids and keep the home, while men would go out, work, make the money, toil in the fields, get killed in war and provide for the family.  Some might argue this was barbaric.  I would argue this was nature's way (again, why else across ALL cultures was this the standard).  But whether this arrangement was good or bad is moot. It was what it was.  Women converted their youth and beauty into resources by having sex with a man who would provide those resources. 

This 2 million year old social contract was upended and replaced, however, and very recently so.  Because with rapid advances in technology, women's suffrage, democracy, and the elimination of traditional gender roles, women were no longer relegated to the home to rear and tend to the children.  Like men, they were allowed to go out and work, support themselves, own property, etc., freeing them from the expectation that they would have to exchange sex for resources, putting their own livelihoods in their own hands.  Furthermore, to cement this "new contract", the traditional role of men was replaced with the government.  The ultimate authority and responsibility in providing for a woman (and any children she might have) would no longer be men or an individual man, but the taxpayer through the state.  Thus, while men still made the lion's share of economic production, individual husbands would no longer pay individually to support an individual wife in exchange for sex.  Men (and working women) would pay communally for all women (and any consequential children) via the government, and sex would be incidental.  For the first time in human history women were truly free from men, and it was thanks to this "second social contract."

But before women get too excited about this "second social contract" and the freedoms it has afforded them, it gets even better.  Because the internet has provided for what could be considered a "third social contract" that combines the best aspects of the previous two with the drawbacks of none.

Old habits die hard, especially 2 million year old ones.  And just because women no longer need men, and men no longer need women, it doesn't mean men's genetic and biological desire for female youth and beauty has gone away.  Furthermore, men still make the majority of money, produce the majority of GDP, and control the majority of wealth.  So whatever success feminism has had in freeing women from being resource-dependent upon men, the fact still remains female youth and beauty is still the most valuable commodity in the world and men have most of the purchasing power.  Thus, even if women are taken care of via themselves or the state, they can still convert their beauty into cash as an "added bonus" if they wish to do so.

The problem was in the past (whether under the "first or second social contracts") directly converting your youth and beauty into money required either prostitution, stripping, or mistressing, all of which come with an abundance of problems and complications of their own.  Prostitution was (and still is) largely illegal, socially shunned, and the risk of STD's doesn't need pointing out.  Stripping may be legal, but there's the risk of drugs, slipping into prostitution, abuse, stalkers, pimps, mental illness and the whole underworld of stripping.  And though mistressing is perhaps the "healthiest," it also takes a toll on marriages and any children unfortunately indirectly involved.  But all of these problems have one thing in common.  One thing, that if eliminated, eliminates all these drawbacks without lessening the benefits - the physical presence of a man.
So if you can get rid of the physical presence of the man, all these drawbacks go away, but the benefits remain.

And the internet allows women to do precisely this.

The Digital World is Better Than the Real One

STD's, pimps, drugs, abuse, stalkers, possessive men, and even the inconvenience of the physical presence of an annoying man, all these problems are eliminated by the internet.  We highlighted these pro's before by delving into the revolutionary business model of "Chaturbate."  But the ramifications (and benefits) that the internet has for women goes well beyond the mere obsoleting of the strip club industry.  Additionally, there have been some sociological changes as well that makes this "new and improved third contract" a drastic improvement over the previous two.

First, underpinning all of this is the increasing reliance (and preference) for digital relationships over real world ones.  It is no secret that Millennials-and-younger increasingly rely on social media for their social lives, but it is also the case with sexual ones.  Impossible as it may seem (since sex by definition is PHYSICAL), millions of Millennial boys prefer to jerk off to internet porn than engage in the daunting and costly task of pursuing a girl in the real world.  "Why spend all that time in the gym, classroom, traffic and office when I can just jerk off to this girl on Chaturbate for free in my mother's basement?"  And young women's counter to this is "Why should I have to physically have sex with a guy or show up for a date when I can get attention and resources by flashing my boobies on the internet from THOUSANDS of men at the same time?"  It is part economics, part fear, part laziness, and part technology, but also simply a change in generational behavior that younger people have moved their relationships online (including sexual ones).  And though this has resulted in a lot less real-world sex, a lot less dating, even a lot less kissing, it does not negate the fact that it is now more socially acceptable to "have sex online," removing traditional social stigmas surrounding porn and selling one's bodies online.  Thus you old, antiquated Gen X'ers and Baby Boomers might think it's shockingly "risque" your wife sends you a nudie pic on the phone.  For Millennials-and-younger a girl masturbating herself online is just another Tuesday.

Second, if you look at it from a purely "resource-extracting" perspective, the digital world is just as profitable as the brick and mortar one, just without all the drawbacks.  In the US the prostitution industry is estimated to be about $14 billion, while the porn industry (the figures of which are not as precise) are about the same.
However, these statistics only measure what has been traditionally considered "porn."  It does not include all the money girls make today online through booming sites like Chaturbate, Seeking Arrangement, Name Your Price, and a score of others.  Furthermore, it's practically impossible to measure the millions (perhaps billions?) of private financial transactions online between men and women where women simply "send nudes" or "send pics."  Furthermore, if you're going to focus on mere "resource-extraction" a lot of things that aren't porn still are women trading their beauty in for money (cute pics, attention, subscription services, and patreon donations - which we will discuss below).  I'm no economist, but given this wider definition of resources-for-beauty, as well as the booming growth digital female beauty is experiencing online, I would very conservatively estimate the "Digital Female Beauty Commodity Industry" to be 5 times larger than the analog one today, easily reaching 10 times that in the next 5 years.  So yes, most girls today won't be pulling tricks on the street.  But what percent of girls today and in the future will pull metaphorical "digital tricks online?"  It's safer, easier, and multiple times more profitable, so much so I predict it will become the norm.

Third, what is "pulling a trick?"  Thus far we've focused on rather explicit forms of "tricks" where sending nudes is the most innocent of acts and performing sexual acts online is...well...not.  But if we are talking about valuing the "Female Youth and Beauty Commodity Industry" simple online porn is waaaaay too narrow a scope and the number and variety of websites out there highlight this. is arguably the most direct prostitution-like site.  Women who are willing to perform sexual acts for money will likely go on this site and make more than they would on the street.

You have which, though not a porn site, allows many young women to get a huge fan base of men, many of whom will pay for a webcam show - again, akin to digital prostitution.

Why bother with sites at all?  If particularly tech-savvy a girl can program her own site, with her own webcam and use either Skype or some VOIP program to provide men a show, she can cut out the middle man and keep the money to herself.

And who says anything about videos?  Apps like "Only Fans" allow women to simply upload nudes online and men pay egregiously for them.

Matter of fact, who said anything about "nudies" or porn at all?  Women don't even need to upload porn.  Just their mere attention is enough to get men to open their wallets.  Remember, there are BILLIONS of desperate men with internet access and either through apps like "Only Fans," Instagram, or "Snapchat" they'll pay for a mere internet exchange or a picture of a girl in a nice dress. 

But perhaps the most innocent, non-pornigraphic, respectable way a woman can cash in on her beauty online is to simply become a "thot."  Though the term "thot" has a different origin, it now today means a girl who simply uses her looks to garner attention (and thus money) on the internet.  The most perfect example is the "conserva-thot" who is a pretty girl who espouses conservative, traditional, and libertarian beliefs not because she actually believes in them, but because it will get her attention and money from non-leftist men starved for traditional women.  You can have "gun-thots" (cute girl who talks about guns), "hunting-thots" (cute girl who talks about hunting) even "prepper-thots," but all a girl has to do to get an immediate and 5x's more profitable following on the internet is take something men like and add tits...but without actually showing them.

The point is, women now have an array of online ways to convert their beauty into money, many of which allow a woman to maintain her decorum, even give her a career.  If you want to do hardcore porn, by all means go ahead.  If you want to run a wholesome, conservative, Christian, traditional housewife website, by all means go ahead.  Just make sure to show a touch of cleavage, put on the right heels, and have that Patreon page prominently displayed on your site.

Fourth, the digital world even allows women to pursue a traditional marriage, while making money at the same time.  There are sites that have actually monetized the courting process (though admittedly, now you have to leave the comforts of internet and go into the real world).  And I believe these to be the most interesting and consequential of the (now hundreds) of Beauty-Into-Money sites and apps.  The two most notable ones are "" and ""

"Seeking Arrangement" is what is called a "sugar daddy site" which means young, beautiful women look for rich, established men to be their "sugar daddy."  The men pay these girls a monthly allowance or STIPEND and these women provide these men their company.  This site has a chameleon effect because it can serve different purposes for different people.  On the face of it Seeking Arrangement seems an escort site.  Effectively, I'd say it's a legal prostitution site (I have a curiously high number of acquaintances who use the site).  Officially, the site claims it is indeed a dating site designed for women who just want to cut through the bull and find themselves a real, potentially, marriageable man.  It is in fact all three as its users use it for all three purposes.  Still, the point is if a woman wants all the benefits of the old contract (marriage, successful man, resources, safety and stability), but the benefits of the new contract (money for your beauty) without the commitment or expectations, today's internet world allows for that via Seeking Arrangement.

"What's Your Price" is more of a dating site where men pay women for a first date.  It may not be as dubious as Seeking Arrangement, but it still allows for women to translate their beauty and youth into money, while also pursuing the chance of a traditional relationship.  Admittedly, how it works in the real world may be cringy as hell, but these "sugar baby sites" are a much more preferable way to make money versus doing internet porn. 

How Seeking Arrangement Burst the College Bubble

Now when you combine all of the traits and benefits mentioned above, a very interesting "Brave New Digital World" forms.  And while women and feminists may like the freedoms afforded to them by the second and third social contracts, you cannot have a "Brave New World" without some parts of the previous contracts being obsoleted or removed.  And so just as marriage or the mere the physical presence of a man has now become obsolete by the internet-inspired "third social contract," other traditional things have also become obsolete, especially under the "second social contract."

Namely, careers and education, the most important hallmark of modern day women and feminists.

If we take the time to review this "Brave New World" we have the following situation:
  • Women still control the most valuable commodity in the world
  • The internet has opened up a whole new industry by which they can convert this commodity into money
  • Additionally, the internet is so dynamic and the demand for female beauty so high, women needn't even degrade themselves to pornography or webcaming.  There are scores of other completely, socially acceptable ways to do so
  • It takes no serious investment, time, or capital for women to convert their beauty into money
  • It also doesn't take decades of education or training to convert their beauty into money (bar hitting the gym).
  • They can still pursue the first-social-contract promises of a traditional husband and children if they want...while they're making money
  • And finally, there is no shame or stigma converting beauty into money online (even pornographically) as living online is the new norm for younger generations.

    oh...and by the way...there's just one more thing.
  • the pay offered by this "Brave New Digital World" is infinitely more than what the second-social-contract offers women.  Plus, it's for a fraction of the work and effort demanded by the second-social-contract.
And that spells doom for academia and the careerists.

Young women today are faced with an increasingly attractive alternative to wasting 8 years of their youth,  $170,000 of their money on college, and decades of their lives in unfulfilling careers:

On one hand they have their older Millennial female counterparts who are crippled with student loans, approaching 40, not terribly happy, and are slaving away for around $20/hour as a coffee store manager.  They can't afford a car. They can't afford their kids.  And the only thing they complain about more than their ex-hipster-husband, is that they can't find a job with their "Masters in Creative Writing."  But that's OK, because according to the second social contract the government will kick in to help.  They get EBT, Obamacare, a student loan deferment program, and an "Earned Income Tax Credit."

What a way to live!

On the other hand there's their friend "Bitsy."  "Bitsy" makes $50 an hour fresh out of high school using the free smart phone her dad bought her and the "Only Fans" app.  Bitsy could go to college, but why would she when she makes $80,000 a year from the comforts of her own home?  Besides, Bitsy doesn't have much in the way of expenses as her 4 sugar daddies from Seeking Arrangement pay for pretty much everything.  Plus she makes a supplemental $10,000 a year in patreon donations from her "best fans."  "Like OMG!," exclaims Bitsy.  "I'm only 19 but I like make literally THREE TIMES what my bigger sister makes as an elementary school teacher!"  Bitsy plans to buy a new house in two years so she can rent the basement out to her more-educated, but debt-ridden sister.

That's an infinitely better and more successful way to live.

Of course the two stories painted above are simplified, stereotypical anecdotes, but it does show you what the third social contract offers vs. what the old and outdated second social contract offers.

The Brave New Digital World offers women an adequately paying job right out of high school in monetizing their beauty.  It does not require women sacrifice another 4-8 years of their youth earning a worthless degree that won't pay.  It also does not charge them $150,000 in student loans to get said worthless degree.  The Brave New Digital World will not cripple these women financially for the rest of their lives, but rather enrich them.  The Brave New Digital World does not force these women to commute, pay for parking, pay for fees, and sit in front of a computer screen whether that's at school or work.  And the Brave New Digital World doesn't lie to these women about their profession or the promise of making "six figs," but only after you get your MBA.  It simply delivers six figs if you work hard enough at it. Oh, and by the way, you might meet your husband while you're working in the Brave New Digital World.  Oh, and by the way again, you'll still be able to get an education, you'll just actually be able to afford it.

The second-social-contract is horrifically worse, even abusive.  It forces women to unnecessarily attend school for another 4-8 years for degrees that are largely worthless.  It forces women into debt they will never be able to repay.  It enslaves them to low-paying careers that will never afford them financial stability, let alone retirement.  And it lies to women, telling them their education, career, and politics are the most important things in their lives - even more important than family, children, a husband, and love.  And yet, like men, these women quickly find out work sucks, it's boring, it's unrewarding, it's unfair, it's a waste of life, and it's taxing. A miserable life ensues, but hey, at least you got a government check.

When young women today look at these two social contracts and the older women who have gone down each, it's going to become increasingly clear which is the better one to take - the Brave New Digital World.  But an emphasis must be put on the word "increasingly" because as it is right now it's not perfectly clear which path to take.  Understand trillions of dollars has been spent over decades brainwashing generations of young women (and men) to go with the second social contract.  They are propagandized to go to college, go into debt, work hard, pay taxes, and that their career and politics are the only things in life that give them value.  But three trends are occurring right now that I believe will finally break the brainwashing hold K-12 education has on young people today and make it clear the Brave New Digital World is the clear choice.

First, the train wreck known as the "millennial generation" will continue to fail so spectacularly that even their 16 year old kid sisters will recognize them for the jokes they are.  And not only will they view the millennials for the jokes they are, they will realize the college degrees the millennials earned were also jokes.  As it stands right now your average highschooler is still enamored with the idea of "the college experience" because that is all they have to look forward to in life.  But the failure of the millennial generation, especially as it pertains to the education bubble and the consequential student loan crisis, is now publicly and regularly highlighted, even mocked in the media that the allure of college has certainly waned.  It's no longer a "given" you just go to college.  Matter of fact more and more high schoolers view it as a risk.

Second, tuition prices will continue to go up and above their already unaffordable levels.  This will not only provide a financial deterrent to any prospective college-goers, but in light of college losing its veneer due to the "Epic Millennial Train Wreck" exploding in front of us, these increased tuition prices will prompt increasing numbers of young women to reconsider forking over $400 a credit for some Mickey Mouse college degree.

Finally, the money being offered by the Brave New Digital World is simply too good.  Just like the oil boom in North Dakota attracted men from around the world with its high wages, the price for digital female beauty will get so high, women will flood the market.  And just like those men chose to quit school to make $75K in the Bakken oil fields, so too will women quit school to make $85k running a "Gun-Totting-Bikini-Wearing-Christian-Conservative-Wife" website (I just pray that UNLIKE the men of Bakken oil field boom, these young women SAVE AND INVEST their money instead of piss it away).

These three trends are becoming so pronounced that no amount of brainwashing or propaganda will be able to hide college for the scam it truly is.  And with such a convenient and high-paying alternative for women to make money, a significant amount of them will leave college, perhaps never attend it in the first place.  Again, it's impossible to calculate what percent drop there will be in female college enrollment, but it doesn't have to be a lot.  Depending on the elasticity of the product, a small single point percentage drop in demand can result in a 20, 30, even 70% drop in price.  Also, depending on how much debt and bloated overhead these colleges have, a 5% drop in attendance could result in colleges having to lay off 25% of staff because they need to lower tuition by 25% to remain competitive.  Of course this bubble won't burst like the Dotcom bubble or the Housing bubble, but do not be surprised to see tuition come down in the next 10 years as the second-social-contract loses its allure because young women choose to make $40 an hour posting lingerie selfies instead of pay $400 a credit to learn about "Eastern Lesbian Chicano Literature Studies."

There's Just One, Minor Thing - Youth and Beauty

There is, however, just one small, minor, technicality.

The entirety of this Brave New Digital World, and all of its financial promise, and all of the ease of life it can afford, as well as all of the pain it avoids, it all hinges on one minor thing:

That you actually have youth and beauty.

And while being young is easy, being beautiful is hard.

The reason being beautiful is hard is for more reasons than today's modern man might think.  Yes, going to the gym regularly is hard.  Yes, dieting religiously is hard.  And yes, the process beautiful women put themselves through daily with makeup, fashion, hair, etc., is VERY hard.  But the real reason it's incredibly hard for your average young woman to be beautiful today is because establishment women loathe and detest female youth and beauty.  So much so the entire second-social-contract establishment is actively waging a war against beauty and any young women who have it.

Everyday young women, even little girls, are propagandized to believe that beauty "is on the inside."
Corporations, desperate to increase sales lie to women saying "big is beautiful."
Establishment female publications engage in self-worship claiming "every woman is beautiful."
Pretty girls who make a living on their looks are slandered, if not protested out of a job.
Companies that WERE BUILT ON THE PREMISE of female beauty abandon it.
And our education system clearly tells women their education is the ONLY thing that matters.
Even the concept of being female or feminine is attempted to be erased as establishment women and our institutions try to eliminate the concept of "the sexes" altogether.

And thus when you add it all up, modern day establishment women have actually convinced the majority of women (even some weak minded men) that "beauty" is now this:

When it is plainly, clearly, emperor-has-no-clothes-level, NOT.

The question then is why do establishment, second-social-contract women hate female beauty so much?  Why do they put up such hurdles for young women to attain it?  Do they not want young women to be both smart AND beautiful?  And there are many possible reasons for it.

The most obvious of which would be pure and simple envy.  An ugly woman probably begrudges a pretty woman her looks.  Laziness is another explanation because the effort needed to stay in shape, diet, and be beautiful is quite a daunting commitment.  Perhaps most modern women have drank the cool aid and truly do not believe female beauty has any value and instead bow down at the altar of education and career.  And one musn't forget the "retaliatory strike nature" of some misandrist women who just hate men and take pride in depriving men of what they want (the ones who define themselves by screeding "I don't live my life for a man!!!").

But while all those explanations are plausible, and certainly explain why some second-social-contract women hate female beauty, the real reason is much simpler - sunk investment costs.  Most modern day women, most establishment women, most second-social-contact women have committed their time, youth, energies money and investment to their careers and education.  They are fully vested in the second-social-contract.  Their entire lives have been lived in the second-social-contract.

And that's the problem right there - "their entire lives."

Because they are old now.  They have no youth left.  They cannot be beautiful anymore.  And if they can't have access to the world's most valuable commodity, then by god no one can.  That is the real reason behind the war on beauty - establishment women can't face the fact they wasted their youth.

Wage a war against something like "female beauty" all you want, what's sad is these establishment women are wasting their time.  Because no matter how much propaganda they spew, no matter how many trillions of advertising dollars they spend, no matter how many decades of K-college indoctrination they install in young women, it's going up against two much more powerful forces - genetics and economics.

If this whole "anti-beauty" thing was completely insular to the female world, then yes.  Big would be beautiful.  Brains would be the only thing that matters.  Sex could be a social construct.  And whatever other psycho-nonsense modern day establishment women want to tell themselves.  But it's not.  There's this other small segment of society called "men" and men ultimately determine what is beautiful in a woman.  And matter of fact we don't even get to determine it because it is our hard-wired genetics that forces us to.  You can launch all manner of campaigns, lie to your children about being transgendered, feed every one a ton of hormones and drugs, all your efforts will be for nothing because men are hard-wired to like traditionally beautiful women and we forever will be.

But the real trick played on second-social-contract women comes from the world of economics.  Specifically the Law of Supply.  And just like genetic laws are unbreakable, so too is the Law of Supply.

It's already hard enough to be beautiful.  But if second-social-contract women want to shame women from being beautiful, by all means go ahead.  Because it will simply lessen the supply of truly beautiful women.  Sadly, according to the Law of Supply, when supply goes down, the value goes up, making true female beauty all that more valuable.  And any women willing to attain it will reap even more rewards because of their rarity.  Alas, trying to eliminate the value of female beauty by making fewer women beautiful is like trying to lower the value of diamonds by producing less diamonds and flooding the market with dirt.  I'm sorry ladies, you just simply can't win.

Still, while we can focus on the war being waged on female beauty, it is my belief the Brave New Digital World is going to give modern day establishment women a run for their money.  Again, the spectacular failure of the Millennial generation is on display for all young women to see, the miserable lives second-social-contract women lead will also become increasingly-apparently miserable, the costs to enter the second-social-contact (college tuition, and life-long debt servitude) are becoming prohibitive, and the wages/freedom being offered by the Brave New Digital World is bordering on compelling.  The real issue is simply what percentage of women are going to commit to be beautiful?

This is impossible to answer, but as you might surmise by the tone of this article I estimate "more than in the past."  I am not predicting percentages as much as I am a trend here.  I believe there will be more pretty women than in the past.  But I also believe that the Brave New Digital World will not eliminate or replace the second-social-contract as much as split women between the two. You must understand "the ugly will always be with us."  Whether it's out of laziness, sloth, brainwashing, indoctrination, even misandry, a certain percentage of women will always choose the second-social-contract, no matter how horrific it is, because they just refuse to be beautiful.  But if you're willing to put in 4 hours a week at the gym (as opposed to 8 years in a women's study program), maintain your decorum, and actually be feminine, a much better, enjoyable, easier and profitable world awaits if you're just willing to be beautiful.  I optimistically believe future women will choose the latter.

Didn't We Just Come Full Circle?

If you're brave, courageous, and intelligent enough to still have common sense, you'll realize nothing has changed.  Since the dawn of time it was female beauty that drove the human race and today it still is female beauty that drives the human race.  The only real question is whether society wants to acknowledge this fact.

For those that do there is success and happiness in life because basing your decisions in reality is the only guaranteed formula for success.  But if you base your decisions in lies, which all of society decided to do with the second-social-contract, you can expect to pay a dear price.  In this case we ignored men as the engine of economic growth, and denied them the fuel they needed to make it hum (female beauty). The price we paid was slower economic growth, lesser standards of living, divorce, broken homes, broken families, national debts, cripple student loans, and overall more miserable people.  And I would also argue, ironically, it has hurt those who advocated for the second-social-contract the most.  But for whatever price we paid and no matter what sociological or political experiments the government, media, the education industry or "establishment women" wanted to play on society, it was all moot.  It was all a waste of time.  Because in the end reality always wins.

Target Corporation can tell us "big is beautiful."
Formula One racing can fire their F1 girls.
The colleges and universities can scream at women they don't need a man, just an education.
The government can cut checks here and there to keep women just barely above the poverty line.
And feminists can yell at the moon.

It still won't change the fact that female youth and beauty is the most valuable thing on the planet.  And if you're smart, you'll make damn sure you have it.

Enjoy the decline.

If you liked this article check out Aaron's other cool works, podcasts, and publications below!



ASM826 said...

You said, "If women did not exist men truly would just be living in caves, occasionally going out to hunt for food and at best, AT BEST, some creative cave man might have created poker along the way just so we'd have something to do inside the cave during downtime."

We would be living in caves, eating roast mastodon haunch, but the one thing we would have done is figure out how to make beer.

Anonymous said...

Good article.

1. The third social contract does have one important economic feature missing from the first two: durability. Female beauty was consumable in the past. You used it when you had it then you had to go get more when you needed more. Now you can download a few terabytes of porn to a $90 hard drive and jack off to it for the rest of your life for free. Granted, it's not real attention from a live woman, but it's good enough for many men, especially when you consider the price. There is already so much porn you could never watch it all in your lifetime and the selection grows every day. Soon there will be so much porn of any arbitrary niche that you could never run out of big-titted, red-headed, heterochromic, Turkish midget porn, ever.

While computers have made female beauty easier to sell and far more available, it also erodes the value by accumulating a permanent, eclectic, durable, inexhaustible, free supply.

2. Online beauty sales create a floor to widely-marketable real life beauty. Attractive men back in your shithole Wyoming town paired up with monsters because that's all there was. Now men can access a 10/10 online for pennies. The spread between the net value of a physical woman and the net value of a digital woman means that the Wyoming situation will no longer happen. Real women everywhere now have to meet a certain standard to get a man of a certain standard regardless of the local sexual market. Even then, many fat, ugly men will choose digital waifus instead of the cow next door.

3. Women's ability to cash in on the 3rd social contract is easier and greater but also temporary. They have a decade or two at best before they hit the wall and get instantly replaced by newer, younger, hotter women. The old contracts are for life. Women, especially hot ones, are not fiscally responsible because nothing has ever forced them to be. They will waste their money, then waste the money they don't have trying to stave off old age. Just look at all the worn out middle-aged women trying to sell the scraps of their beauty in Vegas. Ultimately they are forced back into one of the first two social contracts. A barren old whore is worthless in the first contract, and there's nothing but depression and cat food at the end of the second.

Mike said...

You know what they say, "Don't dig for gold; sell shovels."
Maybe the career to go into is roboticized cosmetic surgery. Make cosmetic surgery cheap and painless enough, and the supply of beautiful young (and young looking) women will skyrocket.

A Catskill Ego said...

Greetings, Cappy. If you were to factor in the advancements in cosmetic surgery, wouldn't it be less likely that any considerable competition would occur between adherents to the second and third social contracts? If (1) we predict that the costs of such procedures will fall, and (2) that as women today will happily go into debt to enroll in college to attain worthless degrees, why wouldn't they merely, en masse, pay or borrow money to alter their countenances and bodies in order to appeal to men and cash in fabricated beauty for cash?

With this is in mind, the second social contract wouldn't have a shot in hell.

Albert said...

We already have face-tracking software so that people can appear as their furry (or whatever) avatars. How long will it be before someone comes up with a real-time touch-up program that tracks the face and gets rid of various imperfections for the web-cam audience?

That'll make online real-person beauty less of a rare commodity.

On the other hand, one thing the cam-girls can't provide, thotty or not, is the genuine warmth and touch of a companion at one's side.

On the gripping hand, the future belongs to the children of those who have and raise them. _They_ will determine what comes _after_ the decline.

Un Americano said...

Jeff Bezos downgraded for a cross-eyed tranny-looking thing.

sassed1 2many said...

Youth and beauty were all I saught after back in the day. All calories and resources were expended to that end.

David Wholly said...

Great article. Hopefully it won't end up behind a paywall.

I work as "housekeeper" (which is a polite way of saying janitor) at the Citadel Mall (only three shootings so far in the last few months) in Colorado Springs. There's a women's fashion store called "Torrid" there. They specialize in "diverse body styles". Because after all, beauty comes in ALL sizes.

In other words, it's fairly common for them to display posters of fat, overweight women posing provocatively in lingerie.

I'd send an example picture, but...

1. It doesn't seem possible on this forum.

2. Even if it WAS possible, I don't want to gross anyone out.

Anonymous said...

I don't think I've ever posted here before, Cappy.

But...just d@mn.

This is the best thing you ever wrote.

And I particularly like how you correctly point out that all the womyn who have mis-invested in education and a career, will round on the "Youth and Beauty" crowd.

Only thing you're missing: the wise "Youth And Beauty" will have ample opportunity to land a real man and get married.
They will have been exposed to many men, so they'll have a clue.
They won't be in debt.
They will know they have no useful skills, so they won't have hypergamous rejection of blue-collar men.
They WON'T have been indoctrinated in man-hating.
And no college debt!

And, they'll have learned how to *please* men. By force of habit.

Except for having exposed themselves to many multiple men other than their partner, they'll be the (quasi)-virginal, feminine (if arrogant) women men have been thirsting for.

Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret.
You may drive out Nature with a pitchfork, yet she still will hurry back.

Anonymous said...

Gotta address the extraordinary LACK of beautiful, young women. All the guys building roads, rockets, aqueducts, diesel engines, unlocking the secrets of chemistry etc. all have FAT WIVES. You really think a metallurgist is coming home to high-end trim? Female obesity is killing everything.

Anonymous said...

How long will it be before computer graphics and animation technologies are life like enough that young women lose this advantage and any nerd can setup their own site with an animated chick made to order and make mega bucks......

Bill said...

I'm predicting that the next wave of technological advances will not be men pursuing excellence to trade for female beauty, it will be fostered by the cult-like ferver of progressivism to never be happy with the current standards. I could be wrong, but whatev.

Merlin said...

An interesting article. Thought provoking to say the least.

You touched on "Men building civilization". Here's my observations regarding in person interactions, and where things seem to be going.

You know, I get that women want men to do some pre-selection. After all, if they can get 90% of the men to pre-select themselves out of the running, they can concentrate on the top 10% of the available men. I understand that from an individual woman's view. What they don't seem to understand is the damage that this causes to the 90%, which I'll explain in a minute.

The two worst insults that a woman can give a man are in regards to the size of his organ (which without surgery, he really can't do too much about) and his ability to earn money, characterized by a reference to "Living in his parent's basement". This last bothers women in a sub-conscious way. They understand that a man not earning up to his potential is a bad thing, but I doubt that they could explain why.

Most men are satisfied to live in a small space (the aforementioned basement), and really don't need much money to take care of only themselves. It's when a man is attempting to court a woman that he really puts out the extra effort (a nice place to live, a nicer car, better clothes, etc.). He puts out the extra effort in order to demonstrate his provisioning ability, his ability to support a family, in an attempt to woo a woman.

So when a man isn't living up to his potential, women at an instinctive level realize that something's wrong, that he isn't making all of that extra money that they could extract from him (in a number of ways. Everything from flirting (strip clubs, and the like), to begging (can I just borrow a little money, pretty please (bats eyelashes, etc.) to outright theft (family court)).

But, when the 90% realize that they don't have ANY chance of having a relationship with a woman (due to the #metoo movement, sexual harassment laws, college dating rules, etc.) this causes them to reconsider expending that extra effort. On the surface, women say that this is just fine, that they want men to be afraid of repercussions, treating them carefully, not stepping out of line, etc.

Well the problem is that this extra effort that men used to put out, the determination to outthink, out-perform, out-do other men, is the driving force of this society. It is that competitive energy that raised us out of the mud, and into air-conditioned houses. So that when 90% of the men realize that they can't compete in this new marketplace, that even attempting to do so can at a minimum land them in the ranks of the unemployed, and at worst can actually end up with them incarcerated, they increasingly opt out. Hence the MGTOW movement, where men are recognizing the framework that they are operating in, and realizing, as a movie line goes: "the only winning move is not to play".

Now, on the surface, most women don't seem to care about this too much. They seem to be perfectly happy importing alpha males from other societies, and becoming subservient to them (even though being subservient to us is horrible and misogynistic). What they don't seem to realize is both that they have no standing whatever in this new society, and that the imported society is perfectly happy with living in horrible conditions. I'm not so sure that most women would really like to spend the rest of their lives without electricity and flush toilets.

I'm not sure at what point women are going to start realizing the damage that they have collectively caused to this society, but I am heartless enough that when I see them wondering why the entire civilization that they once lived in collapsing around them, and I hear them cry: "What is happening", I will be cruel enough to say: "#metoo This is what you wanted, enjoy".

seriouslypleasedropit said...

This is really good Cap.

Like you, I don't know exactly what the future looks like, but I think you've identified a powerful trend.

A couple thoughts:

- college will still be attractive to young women as a source of status, both for having gone oneself, and for the access to high-status men.
- in-the-flesh high-status men will never go out of style. In college, that generally means athletes
- Online whoring can be lucrative, and will serve for many girls as a way to pay tuition
- In fact this bargain might be embraced explicitly, in some lifestyle article: "I traded my depreciating asset (youth/beauty) for an investment in the future! (education)"
- A lot of the visible results of this trend will be fragmented, implicit rather than explicit. The conservathot thing is a good example: in practice, it's money for tits, but disguised as something else. Lot of things like that.

Anonymous said...


The problem with cult-like progressivism driving future advances is that progressives lack talent and skill. Those things require intelligence and hard work, two things which progressives hate with a passion. Just look at how far Google et al. have fallen in the past few years as the conservatives are progressively being driven out. It used to be all function and no fanfare. Now it's all hype and no delivery.

Anonymous said...

You're at the top of your game. This is a masterpiece. You give us so much to think about here along with so many investment and business opportunities. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Excellent writing. It was worth the time to read.

I think you have a point about things coming full circle with the advent of "digital relationships." But you left out one facet of human nature: Women's need for status.

Young women might be able to earn a lot of money Web-camming, but it won't earn them the status of a college degree. Those big college loans, after all, are not going to pay for "education;" they're paying for the status of having a fancy degree.

My feeling is that all of this will make the divide bigger when it comes to lower-class women (who need the money, first and foremost) and upper-class ones (who crave status). Unless the economy crashes. If that happens (and I think it will), we're likely to see an even bigger influx of upper middle-class girls on all these sites.

-- Days Of Broken Arrows

Barman said...

A wonderful, thought provoking article - thank you!

I hope you are getting a kickback from the girls on Chtuwank for all the extra traffic you are putting their way!

maruadventurer said...

Interesting read. But you dodged a singular point -- For most beauty has a time stamp. Usually by 40. So the question for these women is -- What's your second gig??

Anonymous said...

Bravo, Cappy. This was a tour de force. I do believe that posting this on a third-wave feminist page would cause it to burst into flames.

Anonymous said...

Brilliant! And I totally agree - on most parts.
First, I still see a huge thirst for real women. Online is just an addition or for complete loosers. This might be hardwired too, for example a longing for to be touched (see studies, that touching increases tip rates).

Second, at least here in europe you get a hooker (end 20ies, 7 out of 10) for 100 Dollars an hour. Some regions are also beyond this price. No real affection, no dream girls - but slightly above the girl next door. Maybe I am old fashioned, but why paying for strippers when you get real sex for the same amount?

But I won`t deny, that men are willing to pay ANYTHING if they believe a girl could be marriage material.

Robert What? said...

I am an older dude (early 60s). It is without pride that I say that I currently have a twenty-something SB from SA for about a year and a half now. It is quite enjoyable, but I frequently think that someone like her should be with my twenty-something son, not with me.

willethill said...


Please do a followup on how this affects male patterns of consumption of this new commodification of beauty.

That is men will now budget it as a weekly expense for digital sex beside the rent, groceries, beer money. Like an expensive gym membership. An increased ongoing regular payment but it will have moved the long term investment in himself i.e. his degree, his career, his clothes, car etc. to get his personal girl aka wife.

Now for the same reasons discussed he will shun college but also the useful schooling like STEM, trades, even a driver's license. He now can spend 29.95 or even 295 a week (1,500 to 15,000 a year) on virtual sex instead of the 3k plus a month on maintaining a home for a personal girl aka wife. So why get any more of a job than minimally necessary.

Even if he likes the intellectual challenge of being a tradesman or engineer he can work half time to support his needs including the commodity of youthful beauty. See its right there, line 12 of the budget.

As we transform to this, and Cappy nails it, men working habits will change accordingly.

God help us.

Unknown said...

I worry about that third contract. Yes it may make sense economically, but it's socially dysfunctional. I'm imagining all the future kids being raised in single mother households with no real role models other than a mental child who is becoming increasingly distraught at her dwindling earning potential as her youth and looks deteriorate.

Anonymous said...

Absolutely wild stuff. I'll have to read it again. Great work Cappy.

2bad4all said...

Your are correct about the beer. From what I understand, it was invented by men who had nothing to do with women. Eastern European monks.

Anonymous said...


"Even if he likes the intellectual challenge of being a tradesman or engineer he can work half time to support his needs including the commodity of youthful beauty. See its right there, line 12 of the budget.

As we transform to this, and Cappy nails it, men working habits will change accordingly.

God help us. "

I don't know about tradesmen and engineers, but most dudes can support themselves on less demanding employment than that. Especially if they aren't retards paying camgirls and just look at the plethora of free HD porn already available, and otherwise bang chicks when they can...

heresolong said...

"or a picture of a girl in a nice dress. " Adam's latest Hawt Chick is the perfect example. Arguably the best picture he's posted.

Just out of curiosity, you've mentioned a few times that you don't get much readership of these articles. How exactly do you tell? I don't go to the article directly, I go to your page and read your articles. Seems to me you'd then see hits on the page but not on the article. Just wondering since I (with my low posting and low stats blog) see a dozen or so people directly read each article but a lot more just go to my blog so I don't know what they are reading.

Anonymous said...

You are dead on with this one Aaron, but few will ever state those facts publicly.

Let me share a personal account of the fates of 2 men I knew from the mid-west.

The first was a millennial who graduated HS and was working a blue collar gig. A few years later he met a hot red head about his age, knocked her up and they were married. The marriage abrubtly ended 2 years later when he shot himself. I knew the grandfather of the red head who told me he holds her responsible for his death. Why? "She treated him like dirt and ran him into loads of debt to pay for that house of theirs." She also didn't work and blew up like a zepplin, natch.

The second one is an older Gen X gentleman who retired from the military just to have his wife divorce him and leave him with their 4 sons. He managed fine and the boys all went on to become fine young men. He wanted nothing to do with American women after his divorce, but while working abroad, he converted to islam in order to marry a very beautiful woman from Jordan. No, he is not a believer. He was simply motivated to gain access to a beautiful, feminine woman to have as his wife (and her culture ensured she was submissive).

Men will indeed endure and go to great lengths for feminine beauty.

vok3 said...

" sites that have actually monetized the courting process [...] The two most notable ones are "" and """

They monetize COURTING?


"They can still pursue the first-social-contract promises of a traditional husband and children if they want...while they're making money "

Absolutely, totally, measurably, experimentally false. Making a statement like this clearly demonstrates you don't understand attraction in the least. /r/relationship_advice regularly has threads on this topic (usually, the woman crying about consequences); when a guy finds out his woman has been selling herself IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER, it IMMEDIATELY kills attraction dead.

The guys who act on that are the smart ones. The guys who lie to themselves just are setting themselves up to be eventually destroyed by the woman, because HER attraction never really existed in the first place. Money is interchangeable.

"And finally, there is no shame or stigma converting beauty into money online (even pornographically) as living online is the new norm for younger generations."

Stop lying to yourself.

A long-term stable pair-bond for the purpose of creating the next generation CANNOT exist when 1) divorce is relatively easy, 2) the woman reflexively thinks of men as being just sources of money.

#1 is the legal norm and will remain so for the forseeable future.

The ONLY women one will find on such sites are women who will qualify for #2.

You've got a selection effect at play here. This isn't monetizing courting, it's implementing prostitution with a variable amount of deniability. A man who wants a wife who can be trusted to raise good kids would NEVER pick one off a place like that. If he did, the results would necessarily be disastrous, because she's not in it for family, she's in it for money.

Which plays into the elephant in the room that you left out. Twenty years down the road, what are the consequences of all this?

Again, selection effect. The women who created families will be the ones who avoided all this - the ones who were FORCED to offer loyalty, dedication, family-centredness as a SUBSTITUTE for the beauty they (mostly) don't have. The men who created families will be the ones who retained control of themselves when presented with beauty - the ones who value it less. The women who went around monetizing their beauty - that is, the women who actually HAD beauty - will be the childless or single mother 40-year-olds asking "where are all the good men?"

They will have deliberately and purposefully edited their genes out of existence. There will be a correlation with beauty there, and that beauty will be lost with their childlessness, but on the whole the rest of the world will be better for it.

This article is easily the biggest pile of cherry-picked bullshit I've ever seen you write. You didn't think it through.

Anonymous said...

Your second gig should be financed by your first. Save your camwhore money up to finance an education/skill.

Anonymous said...

I do believe over a thousand years ago their was a face that launched a thousand ships. Just sayin!

Unknown said...

I think you're mistaken about how men spend so much time pursuing women. Other than that, good article.

Only took me 20 minutes to read. False advertising, lol

As you mentioned, there are very few hot girls out there anymore. So you've got 100% of men after the 20% of girls that aren't fat fucks. This pushes their value up so much that most guys won't bother pursuing them (see the 80/20 rule). Why would a girl go out w me if she has 30 millionaire male models after her? So, like most men, I conclude that the juice ain't worth the squeeze. 10 years ago, with good game you could get laid maybe 3-4 times a month with some basic efforts. But the cost of vagina is now so high that it ain't worth it.

Why should I go out? 90% of the girls I hit on slap me in the face. Out of the ones who talk, 90% won't give you their number. Then 90% of the ones who do never text back. Then half the ones who do won't show upm for the date. I can penetrate about 90% of the girls I get on a date, but the problem is it's maybe 1 in 75 or 1 in 80 girls that will actually go out with me. So it takes 3-4 weeks of hitting on girls to get my Richard wet for 20 minutes. And in that time, I'm out $200 maybe. Meh, I'll just play my video games all day.

This will hasten the decline. Why should I work overtime? Why should I try for a career? I can live comfortably off $15,000 a year and currently I make $34k. I'm on track to retire at 42-43 (I'm 23 now). Without a woman, and having suppressed the urge to get into consumerism (thanks to you Cappy for helping me see thru that hogwash), even my modest income is more than enough. I have no motivation to better myself or improve my career. Why should I? Money wouldn't get me a girl, because there's always a richer man.

Lots of other guys think the same way. 70% of the men in my office are single (company employs 1200 staff, presumably half are men). Most of them are MGTOW, even though many of the ones who are don't know it. They live the same way I do. Liquor, guns, beer, TV. Society was built on men chasing snatch. But when the 80% of men who can't catch snatch realize it (and they are doing so now), they stop trying to succeed in life, and society crumbles.

Banshee said...

Beer was invented in prehistory or the very beginning of agricultural times, although it was more like beer porridge in early times. Making beer was largely considered to be women's work, until it became a lucrative profession as production numbers increased.

Anonymous said...

I would suggest that we will be looking at a 4th social contract extremely soon. Female beauty and youth is currently difficult to counterfeit (although porno comics could be considered as such). As you have noted, the supply of a hot girl requires a combination of good genetics and significant hard work (on the girl's part).

What happens when the driving commodity of civilization becomes effectively unlimited in supply? I don't know but we are going to find out. It's going to get a lot less difficult to generate hot girls in the next decade or two. Digital poser software girls, are already doing pictures and video. Potentially robots in the physical (in the longer term).

Christopher robart said...

Nearly perfect bodies can be created by the computer, and in the very close to future these bodies will be quite so realistic, that you won't be in a position to discern the difference between a true actor and a game character. You are curious to know more about adult games, find out here.

Anonymous said...

you look like a 4/10 and a 6.5/10 at best in your instagram photos

Conston39 said...

Beer existed long before monks. It was certainly around in ancient Babylon 3,900 years ago.