tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post5017194291030378906..comments2024-03-25T15:17:04.488-07:00Comments on Captain Capitalism: How California's "Cal-3" Initiative Will Expose the Left's True NatureCaptain Capitalismhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05620212946121617985noreply@blogger.comBlogger21125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-57698727338595084762018-07-18T15:59:34.571-07:002018-07-18T15:59:34.571-07:00The vote is off:
https://www.sfchronicle.com/poli...The vote is off:<br /><br />https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Splitting-up-Calif-State-Supreme-Court-takes-13085880.php<br /><br />Cappy was correct in predicting that the parasites would try to prevent it, under the guise of "environmental" issues. <br /><br />kurt9https://www.blogger.com/profile/02101147267959016924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-54935607543973932342018-07-17T15:24:25.843-07:002018-07-17T15:24:25.843-07:00Reagan "the Conservative" was actually a...Reagan "the Conservative" was actually a liberal governor of California on three issues: abortion, taxes, and gun control. <br /><br />Abortion: <br />On June 14, 1967, Reagan signed the Therapeutic Abortion Act, after only six months as California governor. From 518 legal abortions in California in 1967, the number of abortions soared to an average of 100,000 a year in Reagan’s two terms — more abortions than in any U.S. state before Roe v. Wade.<br />(He was also not against abortion when he impregnated Jacqueline Park, a Warner Bros starlet who had an illegal abortion.)<br /><br />Taxes: <br />In 1967, Reagan signed the largest tax increased in California history up until that time. In 1970, he ran for reelection promising voters his feet were "in concrete" against a state income withholding tax. After this lie, he joked "that sound you hear is the sound of concrete cracking around my feet".<br /><br />Gun Control: <br />Reagan signed the Mulford Act. The Mulford Act forbids Californians from carrying loaded guns. What good is an unloaded gun Ronnie? <br /><br />You’re right Cappy…Americans who believe Reagan is a Conservative are “ignorant, low IQ morons”<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-86327982309818620482018-07-17T14:22:54.910-07:002018-07-17T14:22:54.910-07:00The original idea of splitting CA was to create a ...The original idea of splitting CA was to create a haven for non-liberal Californians. This specific 3-state solution ensures that the conservative population in each new state will be outvoted by the residents of the large liberal city within its boundaries. Not only ones this not solve the original problem, it gives CA three times the (left-leaning) voice in all federal actions and elections. BAD IDEA for conservative Californians AND the rest of the US.Monsoon Matriarchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15476615206392489371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-64805567748675260392018-07-17T14:07:18.435-07:002018-07-17T14:07:18.435-07:00Jefferson State is way more likely then Cal-3. And...Jefferson State is way more likely then Cal-3. And the only thing we masturbate over is your soon to be shut off power and water.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-40083463830619940782018-07-16T12:28:11.480-07:002018-07-16T12:28:11.480-07:00I'm very much in favor of this split. At the s...I'm very much in favor of this split. At the same time I know damn well it is NEVER EVER GOING TO HAPPEN. It's a fantasy Jeffersonites use to masturbate to, but it is only that: a fantasy. vanderleunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10296245324443413545noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-65569384824277218402018-07-15T20:37:11.426-07:002018-07-15T20:37:11.426-07:00You're wasting breath on what won't happen...You're wasting breath on what won't happen.<br />1) Flatly unconstitutional without a lot of other work, which has about as much chance in Congress as does science breeding a flying pig, with actual wings and feathers.<br /><br />2) It'll never happen, because without CA's monstrous winner-take-all electoral vote, Obozo was the last Democrat who'll see the inside of the Oval Office as anything but a visitor, for...ever. And Dems in 49 other states and Sacramento knew this since long ago.<br /><br />3) 49 other states won't give CA 3X the number of senators, ever. If they did, Texas would vote to form 37 states, and Connecticut and Rhode Island would try to split by counties. Everyone can see that elephant coming clear to the horizon, on plains as flat as Kansas. It will never even get started.<br /><br />4) Even if, in some fever-swamp nightmare, it came to pass, because magic and miracles, it would merely ensure civil war broke out in short order, and even harder and faster than what's otherwise likely. "NorCal" in that diagram would be SanFransh*tco and marin County against the entire rrest of the inland portion, which is redder than a sunburnt pig. They would be clamoring for another dissolution, and they'd probably vote with rifles as quick as ballots if it wasn't immediately forthcoming.<br />Worse, the so called "blue counties" are not the 90/10 splits anyone imagines in NYFC or Phuilthadelphia precincts, where Dems get 106% of the registered votes. They're more like 55/45 as often as not. They would devolve into self-destruction too, all too soon, and both sides know it. People haven't been buying all those banned/unbanned/maybe gonna be banned "assault" rifles in CA for target practice.<br /><br />5) The entire state goes bankrupt in less than a decade at present course and speed, due to pension shortfalls. Then the whole Ponzi Game melts down in a 1989-Soviet-Union conflagration of biblical proportions. Start looking at that, not this nonsense.<br /><br />6) The measure splits nothing. It's merely an initiative to talk about talking about maybe, possibly, someday, perhaps, sort of thinking about splitting CA up. At some unknown future date. It is the ultimate "boob bait for the bubbas" on all sides, as every minute you're looking at that, you're not looking at anything they're <i>actually</i> doing, with binding consequences. Anyone discussing this like it's a serious thing, is the titular character in "Rope-A-Dope".<br /><br />This has less effect on your actual life, anywhere, than voting on the winner of <i>Dancing With The Stars</i>.<br />If it passes, it's meaningless.<br />If it fails, it's meaningless.<br />See if you can figure out what that means for it, since before it qualified for the ballot.<br /><br />FFS, quit kicking this dead horse, and let this happy horsesh*t die a quiet death.<br />Aesophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07834464741531503378noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-57647970309803956472018-07-15T18:28:16.502-07:002018-07-15T18:28:16.502-07:00I will be voting yes on the break up of California...I will be voting yes on the break up of California, even if NorCal gets shafted with BOTH San Fran & Sacto. The interior of Cali has always been Reagan country. I can't begin to quote all of the anti BHO signs put up by farmers in Fresno, Stockton, Elk Grove, etc. The upper edges of California might as well be on the moon. I will bet fully 3/4th of the Imbeciles under the Sacramento Dome know where Lassen, Mendocino, or Siskiyou counties are on a map. The fault lines are starting to show: Feinstein didn't get the DNC endorsement. No one like Pelosi anymore since her alzheimers is showing. Stealth Spanielnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-34717161460937625012018-07-15T16:18:04.579-07:002018-07-15T16:18:04.579-07:00Well, that's just fine, Anonymous. As someone ...Well, that's just fine, Anonymous. As someone who was born and raised in LA county, worked in Orange County and lived in the Kalifornia Soviet Republic from 1947 until 2002, I can appreciate your excuses. In The Good Book, such words are categorized as: "straining at gnats and swallowing camels." Let's not talk about rampant crime(I worked as a LEO for 30+years), disease(Hep-C all over SD), homeless camps along the Santa Ana River bike trails, working-class flight to adjoining states due to confiscatory taxes, etc. Just go ahead and keep coloring in your coloring book and praising the Marxists in Sacto, who have banned "single-use" plastic bags. Moonbeam is proud of you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-41433667759661127552018-07-15T15:25:50.510-07:002018-07-15T15:25:50.510-07:00AS to 3:
They, immigrants, along with all other c...AS to 3:<br /><br />They, immigrants, along with all other children in Cal, are NOT being educated, they are being indoctrinated, Mr. Smuglib.<br /><br />Cost benefit analysis was done years ago in the interests of tyrants; dumbed down voters are much easier to manipulate and highly likely to vote for empty promises and 'security.'<br /><br />But you know that, don't you?oughtsixnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-67243911847324691092018-07-15T15:13:46.500-07:002018-07-15T15:13:46.500-07:00@Daniel
You nailed it! Thanks for sparing me the n...@Daniel<br />You nailed it! Thanks for sparing me the need to type a comment.<br />A Kalifornia expatΛΕΟΝΙΔΑΣhttp://fightingintheshade.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-85041683083924936652018-07-15T14:43:03.652-07:002018-07-15T14:43:03.652-07:00I agree. Being a native of Red State California (J...I agree. Being a native of Red State California (Jefferson Territory), there is no way I would vote to become a citizen of a 'new' state that included San Francisco and Sacramento. That would change nothing, other that the magical creation of two new Dem U.S. Senators.<br /><br />Give San Francisco and Sacramento to somebody else that wants them. Nobody north of Rio Linda does.<br />Elmonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-28849310947085887552018-07-14T19:49:35.675-07:002018-07-14T19:49:35.675-07:00Daniel, I agree with you 100%. I ran away to join ...Daniel, I agree with you 100%. I ran away to join the Air Force to get out of that shithole myself. The only reason this has been allowed to go as far as it has is because the Democraps think this will benefit them. So-Cal is dominated by Orange and San Diego counties, as well as San Bernadino. The red counties in comparison are very sparsely populated. The continued invasion from south of the border will seal that state's fate as a democrap stronghold for good. Cal is guaranteed to stay blue. Nor-Cal has Sacramento county AND San Francisco. All three states have a good chance of remaining Dem dominated. So now you have a net gain of 4 US senators. Plus you now need to have two more state capitols created with their bureaucracies and opportunities for parasitism.<br /><br />I'm willing to bet real money that they will seriously try to push for this to happen. I don't know 100% for sure if they will succeed but I think the chances are good it will happen.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-11143141173610934112018-07-13T11:15:21.916-07:002018-07-13T11:15:21.916-07:003. You'd rather they'd grow up uneducated ...<i>3. You'd rather they'd grow up uneducated and be more likely to commit crime? Cost-benefit analysis, Mr. Economist.</i><br /><br />Sending them back across the border is even cheaper than paying to educate them and providing them with welfare/food stamps/etc.Laughingdoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07788824586959334168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-86320287556011656852018-07-13T01:03:16.318-07:002018-07-13T01:03:16.318-07:00guess this an actual "inconvenient truth"...guess this an actual "inconvenient truth"HawkManhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10617264176154870835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-47199906001397509102018-07-12T19:53:40.211-07:002018-07-12T19:53:40.211-07:00... except that San Francisco, for example, is par...... except that San Francisco, for example, is part of N. California - therefore ensuring that N. California votes Democrat. I see this as a clever trick by the leftists, making most think that this is a "divorce" of kinds when that couldn't be further from the truth. In reality, this is on par with a Democrat president packing the Supreme Court. I believe what this really is a leftist attempt to get 6 (Democrat) senators out of California to give the Democrats a senate majority. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18343260022296112729noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-64133295791693122292018-07-12T18:57:03.680-07:002018-07-12T18:57:03.680-07:00Even better!
http://www.sixcalifornias.comEven better! <br /><br />http://www.sixcalifornias.comA Texannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-31678843874065743052018-07-12T17:34:33.942-07:002018-07-12T17:34:33.942-07:00They have banned bags, have emissions standards, p...<i> They have banned bags, have emissions standards, pay for illegal aliens' education, </i><br /><br />While I find your occasional rant against California amusing/funny, you're way off the mark when it comes to reasons as to WHY California implemented many of its policies. (*Hint: It's not due to some underlying liberal/socialist agenda). For example, using the quote above...<br /><br />1. CA didn't ban plastic bags--they banned <i><b>single-use</b></i> plastic bags. You can buy as many reusable plastic bags as you need at the grocery store for 10 cents a piece that are very similar (actually, better) to the old single-use bags. The reason they did this was because those plastic bags were a constant source of litter in cities, freeways, beaches, sewers, etc. and cost the taxpayers extra for the cleanup. <br /><br />2. Every state has emission standards. You could argue CA has stricter standards, and you'd probably be right. There's a reason for that--LA back in the 50s to the 80s had frequent stage 3 smog alerts.<br /><br />3. You'd rather they'd grow up uneducated and be more likely to commit crime? Cost-benefit analysis, Mr. Economist. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-89054181327779717462018-07-12T11:45:56.835-07:002018-07-12T11:45:56.835-07:00The lefties also cannot afford to split up the ele...The lefties also cannot afford to split up the electoral votes. Every election nobody in the snooze media even remarks about the weight of Cali's blue guarantee. Are they really willing to split those up and give the inner and northern provinces a voice, doubtful. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14276404414034109450noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-56019644382096453002018-07-12T10:32:06.263-07:002018-07-12T10:32:06.263-07:00Hi Captain -- where were those beautiful photos ta...Hi Captain -- where were those beautiful photos taken? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-8371171940179075252018-07-12T10:20:48.688-07:002018-07-12T10:20:48.688-07:00Well actually, all they'll do if the split is ...Well actually, all they'll do if the split is approved is divide the state so their hive shiite holes control the elected bodies. With San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, and San Diego, that is rather easy for them.Mark Matisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8358039.post-11339284207529898092018-07-12T09:54:42.529-07:002018-07-12T09:54:42.529-07:00I'm a Californian and you're right Cap, th...I'm a Californian and you're right Cap, the leftists are scared to death of this. The truth about CA is that LA and SF are the leftest hotbeds, the rest of the coast is fairly red. "Northern CA" will stay blue because of SF (which is in big trouble with it's shit filled streets and drug infested neighborhoods). "Southern CA" will turn Red because, like you said, it's made up of all the farmers and ranches and all the people that actually produce something of value. And "California" will stay blue because of LA, which sucks because it includes us in the middle of SF and LA who are red through and through.<br /><br />Another huge negative for the communist party is that it breaks up their 55 electoral votes that are currently a complete lock thanks to SF and LA.<br /><br />I'll be voting for the breakup and praying that LA has an earthquake and falls into the ocean.MattyIcehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14316099438025166981noreply@blogger.com