Tuesday, October 07, 2008

You Will Visit Sean

I made a post about how we should cheer on the winners. It begat a comment from a guy called Sean. I rarely post comments as stand alone publications, but this one was worth reading. He made a similar post here, but I like the one he made below;

Cap, some years back I was diagnosed with severe schizophrenia and put on permanent disability. This last health calamity came on top of an injured back and a bad heart.

If I had stayed on disability for the rest of my life no one would have blamed me. But I didn't like it. I had always paid my own way and I was determined to keep doing so if I could.

So I self-studied and became an expert on computers. I scrounged old bits from garbage bins and built working systems. I read everything available at the local libraries. I horse traded for used books. I scraped together to find money for new books.

Now I'm a certified computer technician running my own business in a small town in Alberta, Canada. I'm not rich by any means, but we get by. I drive a 20 year old van and my family lives in a *paid for* manufactured home. We have some business expenses on our credit cards, but it's all debt that we can service, even if our business is cut by 2/3.

I'm proud of making it from where I was when I was 23 -- written off by the medical profession -- to being a successful independent business owner 16 years later.

So it angers the hell out of me when I have the candidate for the socialist party here in Canada come into my store and tell me how much he appreciates small business when the leader of his party is busy promising all of my hard-earned $$ to a bunch of welfare suck tits. I told the wanna be politician that he had ten seconds to decide whether he was leaving via the front door or the front window.

Yeah, it would be easier just to sit back and let others pay my way, but there's no way I could live with myself if I did. And let's face it: if someone with my degree of health impairment can earn a living, so can a lot of other "disabled" people.

The reason I like this post (aside from the old school Americanism), is that this hands down shoots out and undermines one of the key arguments socialism relies upon; victimhood.

There are people out there who start off poor, who are disabled, who are of a minority race, and despite these "drawbacks" still manage greatness on par with anybody else. And the reason this is such a threat to socialists is that if people with these "drawbacks" were ever to realize their full potential and what they could achieve, they would drop the democrat/socialist/labor parties forever.

People have requested Sean's place of business so they may send him some. Here you go;

Monday, October 06, 2008

Interview MP3

Hi All!

Here's the interview in MP3 form I guess. The quality is a bit poor, but you should just be able to click on it and it should start playing.

Is The Economist Leaning to the Left?

As all of you know I swear by The Economist, but ever since they got a new editor, I sensed it has taken a turn to the left. Global warming is a foregone conclusion, environmentalism takes up precious space that should be used instead on economic/financial issues, and every time I have the time to sit and read through an issue I'm let down more and more by an increasing percentage of the articles I disagree with.

But this took the cake and more or less has me convinced that at the corporate HQ of The Economist changes have been made and there has been a direct order to report a more leftist slant;


Additionally look at this map;


It shows the world overly in favor of Obama. Interestingly enough 100% of Saudi's are for Obama and 0% for McCain. But if you click on the US, you'll see that 20% are for McCain while 80% are for Obama.

Interesting. I could have swore they were in a statistical deadheat according to our domestic polls.

Alas, maybe The Economist is truly capitalist and just catering to a larger leftist readership.

Sunday, October 05, 2008

The Captain Is Getting Interviewed Again

Hello All!

There was some difficulty I hear getting to tune into my 1280 interview, so hopefully this will make things simpler.

Marty Andrade, a radio show host up in a town called St. Cloud (about 90 miles NW of Minneapolis) will be interviewing me and I guess to make it simpler you can just go here. No logins, no passwords, you should be able to just go to that site and it "should" work.

Interview will start at Noon today (Monday) central standard time. Certainly feel free to call in, would like to hear from all you guys out there aside from the posting, it feels quite impersonable posting all this time and never really getting to chat. Regardless, the number is 646.652.4947.

Hope you tune in!

Hope, Change and Brainwashing

The ignorance is more of a sad disgrace than it is scary.

If you listen to what they pledge for, it is admirable.

Aside from the one who pledges to be a lawyer, the rest of these young men pledge to become engineers, architects and firemen. They also pledge to do it on their own.

Sadly for them, they don't realize this is NOT what Obama and to a larger extent, socialism stands for. Such independence can only be described as truly American and capitalist. Something that can only come from themselves and their desire to choose for themselves the path of their life.

Obama has nothing to do with it. It has everything to do with these young boys becoming truly independent, upstanding men. Sadly instead of taking the credit where it is deserved (themselves) they give it to Obama.

Though, once they start paying taxes on a chemical engineer's salary, I think they'll all turn republican.

"But People Can't Get Credit"

I'm mighty sick of the rationalization of the bail out based on the concept that "people can't get credit" ergo the whole world will end. The point is moot in that the bail out has already passed, but I still want to go down in the history books as saying,

"The last thing the US needs is more debt. A tightening of credit and LESS debt is exactly what this country needs."

Of course I know what I've just said is blasphemy; telling Americans to work, live within their means and not use debt to buy what they can't afford, but that still doesn't change the fact that Americans are overleveraged.

Alas, why I found this chart in The Economist very interesting;


I've seen government debt as a % of GDP. As well as household debt as a % of GDP. But I never saw "Total Debt" (which includes government, consumer and corporate debt) as a percent of GDP, which is now higher than it was during the Great Depression.

I don't care what the likes of Hank Paulson, Bernanke and whoever else out in Washington thinks, the forces of economics are more powerful than their little plan. And bail out or not, I'm going to gander the economy will still collapse under the weight of this debt.

Oh, and that doesn't even include the weight soon to be added by social security and medicare which is right around the corner.

Communist Goals

I've always suspected the communist agents of the 1960's are grinning ear to ear with their success.

#22 and #23 can more or less be summed up as "The Walker Art Center."

Friday, October 03, 2008

The Captain Returns to Radio

Hello captain capitalismites! I will be tentatively returning to radio tomorrow. Unfortunately it's just for an interview about the book, but feel free to tune in. As I said it is tentative, but if they have the time I will be on the air on AM 1280 the Patriot on Northern Alliance's "The Final Word" with Dr. King Banaian.


It will be around 4-5PM, Central Standard Time. You can tune in here.

Ode to Tom Petters

Given the recent arrest of Tom Petters, I thought this repost would be very befitting for the latest "high flier" who now has to have the "Trophy Wife Chat." Enjoy jail time Tom!

Like most other people, I'm livid over the housing debacle and the prospective bail out. And in times like these where the rest of us are facing a recession, a loss of a job, or poverty because of a group of greedy scum sucking parasites, I find it helpful to point out the occasional thing that might bring a bit of happiness or humor into our lives (or permit us pure, vicious schadenfreude in watching these scumbags get what they deserve). And one of those thing is the "trophy wife talk."

You see, there this "talk" being held in thousands of luxurious suburbanite McMansions across the US and it's the "Honey, let me explain to you the difference between debt and equity spending" talk. This talk is where the powerful and successful investment banker, commercial banker, real estate developer (fill in the blank) has to come home and explain to his little trophy wife the difference between debt and equity spending.

The reason this talk is necessary is because despite them being a "successful" real estate developer, the truth of the matter is all they did was borrow other people's money and live off of it. And now that the market is collapsing and their empire is crumbling, they now have to shuffle back home in shame and explain to their ditzy wives why when they left for work in the morning they were a high flying, SUV driving, investment banking real estate mogul, but now upon their return are bankrupt, scumbag losers.

You see, real SUCCESSFUL MEN don't have to have this talk. Because we, no matter how small or insignificant our career or job may be, earn this thing called "profit." We earn more than we make. We go to our jobs, be it a high flying surgeon or a burger flipper at McDonald's, we get our pay check and we spend less than what we earned. And while some of us may only make $35,000 a year, that is infinitely more than what this plethora of real estate developers, investment bankers, and mortgage brokers made, simply by the fact it's a positive number.

But the real shame these faux business"men" face is that they were never able to make a profit in the first place. They were never able to get it economically "up." And the only way they could make it was by borrowing money. They're too shallow to admit it, but they never turned a profit. They never produced a penny of wealth. They don't even approach us in terms of being real men with real jobs who do real work.

Ahhh, but the irony doesn't stop there. For you see, these egomanics not only found nothing wrong with borrowing money to survive, but found nothing wrong with borrowing millions of dollars to live a luxurious lifestyle they never had the wherewithal to EARN.

Real estate developers are a perfect example. I don't know how many stories I could tell you of the "multi-millionaire" real estate developer who was some big shot out there who thought he was king sh!t. They all drive Beamers. They all own multi-million dollar homes on the lake and they all have drop dead gorgeous wives. But when the market started to crumble, they became desperate. And the reason they because desperate is because they had borrowed so much money to afford these unsustainable lifestyles, even with the profits they had before, they could not keep up the charade.

Now many of them would try. Again, I don't know how many real estate developers I had in my bank back in 2005-2006 that were trying to borrow any amount they could get. They would lie on their personal financial statements, grossly exaggerating the value of their real estate empire (thus allowing them to borrow even more money) so they could get the funds to continue living their faux jet set lifestyle. But in the end, it would catch up with them, for ultimately, no matter how big their operations were, those operations weren't profitable. It was just like the US auto industry. It doesn't matter how "big" GM is, it's still a lousy, money losing company.

But here is why the "Trophy Wife Chat" is all the more necessary.

Trophy wives don't know the difference between debt and equity spending.

When "investment banking man" met his floozy of a wife at the bar he didn't tell her what his "adjusted gross income" was, because there was none. When the "real estate mogul" met his soon-to-be eye candy wife at the club, he didn't tell her what his "net income" was, because there was none. Both of them just bragged, "well I work on multi-million dollar deals." "I'm a multi-million dollar real estate developer." And the reason why is that the typical trophy wife doesn't know the difference between sales and profits. The typical trophy wife actually thinks you are a millionaire when you say you "own a $4 million house" but have $4.2 million in mortgages against it.

Ergo, the typical trophy wife cannot discern between the money you spend on them on whether it is borrowed money (debt) or money you actually made (equity).

And key to understand this, is they don't care. As long as you spend the money on them, whether you earned it or not, is completely irrelevant to them.

And thus all the more shock when this "chat" occurs.

For to whet your schadenfreude appetite I have seen this happen multiple times. As the housing market crashed, I have seen at least 10 "highly successful (ahem) "men" forced to sell their luxurious mansions and move into a lesser zip code. I even remember one desperate big shot insisting that on all the paper work we had, that we list the luxurious town of "Edina" instead of where he really moved to (the much less posh town of Richfield) because he didn't want people to know he moved out of Edina. The blow to their egos was so crushing, so shameful, so rude-awakening-ish that it should at least provide some of you a bit of solace.

But the ultimate payoff is to know the conversation that must have been had and is being had across the nation. To be a fly on the wall when these fat, gluttonous, embezzling, dirtbag scumball schmutzes who dared to live off of the rest of us to the tunes of millions, had to go home and explain to their moronic wives why they had to;

1. Sell the house
2. Move to a lesser neighborhood.
3. Sell the Lexus, the Beamer, the Mercedes and buy a Buick
4. Pull the kids out of private school
5. Cancel the trip to Arizona
6. Sell the house in Arizona
7. Oh, and by the way the feds might be coming knocking at the door
8. Do your mom have a place we can stay?
9. What do you mean "divorce?"

has to at least make some of you feel better.

For I've said it before, and I'll say it again, we may not be rich, but we are real men and women who are really independent. We are better than them.

And if you need something of a boost like the above to get you through the day and put a smile on your face again, please consider buying my book. Plenty of more stories and some of my finest work.

Click Here

And then keep hitting next.

Thursday, October 02, 2008

When I Am President

I would do this. Very serious, I would.

Housing Prices May Over-Correct

Not to let anybody down, but given the bad taste the housing crash has left in people's mouths, not to mention the sub prime market more or less prematurely wiped out younger home buyers who would be in the market for a house today, if they hadn't been bankrupted 3 years ago, I don't think we're going to see a return to a "bottom" we're going to like.

Demand for housing is going to be less than its traditional long term average. And now you throw banks in there who are a bit gun-shy (not to mention collapsing) and it's a pretty good formula for housing prices to drop below their long term average.

Additionally, it pays to compare the US housing market to that of Japan's almost 2 decades ago. You think we've had a drop in prices now? Japan's housing has never recovered, going from a house to income indexed ratio of 120, to almost half that today.


If the Japanese housing market is any kind of portender of things to come, if we link the US chart to the Japanese chart to project the US housing market, prices could drop significantly more than what we think they will;


Roughly, 40% MORE from what they've dropped already. The median house price in the US would go from $220,000 (2007) to about $130,000 by 2023. Of course that's only if we're stupid enough to do what the Japanese did and bail out their economy to the tune of a trillion dollars and keep dead companies afloat at the expense of the tax payer...oh wait.

End Norm Coleman's Career

Found out my senator (Norm Coleman) voted for the bail out. I sent him a, ahem, "stern" letter. Something about enjoying the private sector when he's voted out of office and the liberal use of the f word.

In the meantime I suggest you do the same for your senators and when it comes time for these schumcks' re-election vote for anybody but them (I'm voting independent in the senatorial race since I can't vote for Al "Stewart Smalley" Franken).

But we should point out the true statesmen and heroes of the hour who do deserve to be re-elected.

Got a couple posts thinking I'm voting from Stewart Smalley. I'm voting Dean Barkley.

I suggest all the other republicans out there do the same.

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

When America Was

Permit me a short story.

I bought 2 tickets to see Victor Borge when I was in college. And because most American women my age (not to mention, most American men) were uncultured naives, I could not find a date to see this musical and comical genius.

I ended up taking a friend of mine to see Victor Borge so as not to let the ticket go to waste. Regardless, though he is dead, Victor Borge and his comedy got me through some of the toughest (arguably the toughest) times in my life. And I think, there's a lot of people out there who could do with a good healthy dose of Victor Borge to get through the piss poor times that we face today;

Here's a healthy dose.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Gen X and Y Should Be Against a Bail Out, and Cheering Like No Tomorrow for a Financial Melt Down

Markets have this uncanny ability to wreak poetic justice.

For example the injustice, even more so than the $700 billion bail out, is the transfer of wealth from younger generations to older generations in the form of Social Security and (to a rarely known) larger effect, Medicare. I've seen figures around $75 trillion in unfunded entitlements, but even if it's just a fraction of that, the bail out of older generations ineptitude to save for their own retirement will dwarf this pittance of a "housing" bail out.

However, like I said, markets have a very wicked way of wreaking poetic justice and now is a perfect example.

Though it's counterintuitive, younger generations should be cheering for stocks to crash as low as possible. The reason why is simple; we're not retiring tomorrow. We're retiring 30-40 years from now. So why would we want to pay a premium for stocks? Oh, sure, if you're retiring tomorrow, you're screwed. If you thought you were going to snow bird it down to Florida and sell your house and live off your 401k plan next year, you're hosed. But if you're in the "acquiring stage" of building up your retirement portfolio, you should be cheering like mad for the stock markets to crash. For stocks are no different than any consumer good. Do you want to pay $5 for a gallon of gas? I presume not. So why would you want to pay $100 for a share of Microsoft, let alone cheer when stock prices go up. You want the price of stocks, just like gas, cars, chocolate and wiener dogs to go down.

It is here though the poetic justice manifests itself. People, regardless of generational age, should be against the bail out just on principle alone. But younger folk, if they're smart, should not only be cheering against a bail out on principle, but if there is no bail out and then financial collapse does ensue (though I wonder about that) it will make the primary vehicle by which we save for retirement (stocks/mutual funds) insanely cheaper. It is in this lowering of price, that in essence, results an a "transfer back of wealth." Those imminently facing retirement will suffer a drop in their stock prices and be forced to sell at a lower price. While the youthful will be able to pick up those stocks for a fire sale price (not to mention as they approach their higher income earning years) and recoup some of the money we'd have to shell out at a later date to support those imminently approaching retirement.

Not that younger generations should be maliciously cheering for stocks to go down because it impoverishes other people out of spite, but the point I'm making is that the market is making this a reality anyway.

Monday, September 29, 2008

The US Needs a Serious Ass Spanking

The arrogance I see in the traders of Wall Street and the members of congress is insulting.

How dare you schumcks, you dumb American people, you insignificant plebs insist there is no bail out

.

How dare you morons, you simpletons who can’t possibly understand the complexities of spending less than what you make, refuse to bail our corrupt, spoiled rotten asses out.

Don’t you know who we are? We are the leaders of the United States. This is not a democracy, we tell you what to do. Not the other way around.

The beauty of this bail out getting shot down in flames, is that it bitch slaps these bastards right upside the head and harshly reminds them that it is THEY who work for US.

I don’t know about you, but I did contact my representatives in congress and basically said that if a bail out did go through, I would not only not vote for them, but fund their competition come the next election season. It seems a couple million of you did as well, for some true STATESMEN did their duty and voted in the best interests of the people.

But there is something that must be discussed or at least clarified here. And the reason is because we’re told that this bail out is absolutely necessary. That it is needed and if we don’t get a bail out of some sort, then “main street” will be harmed by the follies of Wall Street.

B as in B

S as in S.

Let me try to explain it in a manner that won’t put normal non-economist people to sleep.

There is a certain, fixed amount of economic pain that this country has to go through for its financial sins. For spending more than it makes. For putting everything on a credit card. For refusing to work for the things we want. And if we can’t afford it, oh well, we’ll just file for bankruptcy.

This amount of pain is unavoidable. We cannot escape it. We are suffering the beginnings of it right now, but we do have an option of how we want to endure it. It’s the classical;

“Do you jump into the cold water and get it over with in one shot? Or do you ooch in, inch by inch and acclimate yourself slowly to it.”

The first option, just “jumping in” as it were, would be where there would be no bail out. We let the markets fall to wherever they may. A bottom will be found, the market will stabilize, assets and resources will be reallocated, we’ll go into a sharp recession, but it will be over with within a year.

The second option is to go through with the bail out and instead of suffering one big hit, borrow or print off more money to spread the pain out over time. This is more of the “FDR” approach to the Great Depression (which is half the reason it lasted so damn long). There will not be as a sharp recession or as sharp of a jump in unemployment, but the economy will be slothful, with growth minimal and under 1% for at least a year, and unemployment will still go up and remain there stubbornly for the foreseeable future.

Now most paradoxes, the choices are equally appealing or unappealing. This is why they’re called “paradoxes.” But in the case of the bail out, there is no debate; the jump in the water approach is immensely more beneficial than the ooch in approach. And the reason why is a long lost art form in the United States;

Punishment.

Punishment is a good thing. Arguably the majority of the social, economic, and crime problems in the US can be traced back to a lack of punishment, namely a lack of heavy handed fathers. An unwavering father-figure that would state what is right, and what is wrong, didn’t give a dam what you thought, and by God if you cross that line, you are getting punished.

Now the benefits of punishment is if you have a father who genuinely cares about you and loves you, he will have no problem disciplining you as it is in your best long term interests. You may not have liked it at the moment when you were 7 and getting spanked for shaving the dog (guilty), but when you got older you were immensely grateful for those harsh lessons your father insisted upon you in your youth. And when it comes to a country, it’s no different.

Unfortunately here in the US as a society have been brought up by a bunch of pansy, sensitive 90’s type wussy fathers. Congress never being able to tell you no. Money for everybody and everything. And did you do a naughty thing? Well, “what did congress do wrong? Did we not give you enough money? Would you like some free college tuition and health care and cake and pie and apples and candy?” And good lord, could there be a better example of an utter lack of fatherly wisdom and guidance than the public schools? Children can do no wrong. And if they do, how much of the taxpayer’s money can we give you?

Alas, now daddy’s little girl has come home and told him that she not only stole his credit card, but racked up $700 billion in bad mortgages on it. Daddy’s little girl being the financial deadbeats who knowingly or ignorantly took on more debt than they could afford or the banking scumbags who were all too eager to give the $700 billion to people who really weren’t any more intelligent than a 14 year old suburbanite princess.

What does Daddy do?

Does daddy say, “Oh, I’m sorry sweetie. What did I do wrong? How did I fail as a father that you racked up $700 billion of other people’s money? Maybe you need therapy. Maybe I need therapy?”

Or does Daddy say,

Bend the ef over, I am going to spank you freaking silly and then ground you until you are 40. And not only that, on top of it, I’m going to send you to the work house to ensure you pay all $700 billion back and if you have to work until you’re dead, so be it.”

This is the ultimate reason why the “jump in all at once” approach is better than the “ooch in” approach. Because punishment will be served. Justice will be done. Revenge will be savored.

If there is no bail out, then daddy’s little princesses are going to get the punishment they so rightly deserve. The financial deadbeats will get no “federal aid” to support their habit of being freaking morons and spending more than they make. The arrogant charlatans of our times known as bankers and politicians and all their political cronies who have vested financial interests in the financial services industry and have parasited off the back of the millions of hardworking Americans will have to (OH MY GOD) become HARD WORKING AMERICANS! But key to this all, and why this approach is infinitely superior to the ooch in approach, is because punishment on the order of making these bastards eat all $700 billion of THEIR OWN MESS will make them never again screw the American people over for their own selfish interests. And yes, we may go through a harsh recession. And yes, unemployment will go up. And yes, you Americans will bitch and whine about it. But in the end, we will have a more responsible society as those who were irresponsible will be perpetually impoverish to the point of financial incripplement, and the rest of America can move on (at a higher rate of economic growth I might add), unencumbered without them.

All it is, is a simple matter of reminding those bastards in Washington who’s in control. It is within your power. The arrogance of “congressional leaders,” George Bush, Paulson and the other elites out there to DEMAND we give them a bail out (for as far as I can tell is to ensure elitists stay wealth at your expense) is the most compelling reason why not only they should be voted out of office, but why you, as an American citizen are compelled to call your congressional representatives and demand there be no bail out whatsoever.

Because, after all, this is a democracy. And congress, as well as president Bush needs to be reminded of “Who’s their daddy.”

Oh, and buy my book already! To quote Bill Cosby "It'll make you smart!"

Those Who Earn It Are More Charitable

To simplify things; if you inherit it, you're stingy. If you earn it, you're more charitable. And thus this simple rule was confirmed by Alice D Camel when she sent me this chart;



I've had theories about this, but it basically boils down to that unless you started off poor and know the challenges and how difficult it is to become rich, you really are incapable of genuine sympathy. Thus why those who inherit their wealth are not so generous with it, because, we'll, "how hard is it to become rich? I am and, why I just sat here."

However, tangential to this theory is also why leftists who are rich, tend to insist that the poor must be helped, but much prefer to force you to be charitable with YOUR money, rather than theirs. It is no coincidence communist intellectual titans such as Marx and Che Che were spoiled little brats, born with silver spoons in their mouths. They never had to work, they were trust fund babies. And having such a life of luxury afforded them the genuine intellectual luxury of advocating socialism and communism. They never had to work. They never had to strive. All they had to do was in order to sound cool and hip and intellectual was advocate a new economic system that would transfer the wealth from the producers to the parasites...err....I mean the "have's" and "have not's." Of course, they still had to be in command and be members of the elite in this new society, but they "cared" about the people.

Sadly you can see this strain or viral thought in many elite or "limousine liberals" today.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Democrats, Republicans and the Bail Out


Full article is here. It's a short piece.

Obama is Such a Hypocrite

I can't watch debates solely because you have to be an idiot to believe a word EITHER candidate was saying. All these people asking me, "So did you watch the debates?"

No, why would I? I know what both of the candidates are going to do once they get into office, and pretty much everybody else does, no matter what they're going to say on national television. The only reason they even have debates is to go after that group of undecideds who are so politically ignorant that they are undecided at this late stage in the game, yet are so politically important because they will decide who the next president is. Ergo, now you have Barack Obama calling for drilling for oil now? Hello??????, can you say stick wet finger in the air and lie through my teeth and say whatever I can to get elected?

Regardless, this was the best part of the debate and shows you just how pointless it is to watch these debates. You all go ahead and watch the debates. I don't have time to be lied to as my life is very finite and very precious. Ergo, my time will not be wasted listening to talking heads.

Even Though It Makes Comlete Sense, It's Evil and Biased

By the sole fact this came from the American Petroleum Institute the ignorant will immediately write it off as it doesn't fit into their little self-serving warped version of how the real world works.

For the rest of us who understand 3rd grade economics, it's interesting and is a good story from the "front lines" of oil companies trying to get more oil.