Wednesday, November 15, 2006

The Best of Captain Capitalism - Do Not Disturb the Economists

This one came after what one could expect after a natural disaster; the bumper sticker sound byte that the US doesn't donate enough in foreign aid and charity. It kind of miffed me because you'd think all those "generous" European countries would be thankful for that great doling out called "The Marshall Plan" that allowed them to be so generous today. That aside, the key issue is that the media (surprise) only looks at government spending, not private donations to charity (presumably because the public sector is the only thing that matters).

Regardless, these are some handy charts to save on your memory stick when you get into it with a liberal that demands the US spend more on international aid.

Tis the holiday season and like most normal folk, economists are in the midst of the Christmas/New Year festivities. Which means that like most people we too are festive, over-eating, visiting family and friends, and above all drunk.

But as I have mentioned before, drunk economists are not something to be released into society. We should be treated like hibernating bears;

DO NOT DISTURB!

Alas, leave it to the idiots in the media to rattle our cages and disrupt us from our holiday drunken stupor and incur our wrath.

The idiot that has awoken us is no one individual in particular, but the choir of leftists, democrats, liberals and other varied sorts of socialists whose opinions just happen to be succinctly culminated in an article about the "stinginess" of Americans in the Minneapolis Star Tribune.

No more than three days into the horrific events of the earthquake-triggered tsunamis do you have some spoiled brat, daddy paid my way through journalism school, never had to support myself, blame-America-first, editorialist already deriding America and George Bush for their "appalling" lack of response to the tsunami tragedy. This idiot is even so arrogant as to suggest the attire President Bush should wear when giving a theoretical speech about the disaster in south east Asia. But what is even more appalling is that a major "professional" publication would provide this moron a medium by which to spew his garbage to the masses.

But the particular issue I have with this is not stupid editorialists with agendas or stupid publications with agendas, but a leftist myth that almost everyone swallows and you'll be sure to see surfacing as this tsunami tragedy unfolds;

The US donates less than most any other developed nation as a percent of its GDP.

Again it seems the remnants of the Soviet empire and their abandoned pot-smoking, Baby Boomer, 1960's agents of communism are at it again, never sleeping, always trying to destroy capitalism, freedom and all that is good, via misinformation, brainwashing, indoctrination and outright lies.

Sadly they disrupted a slumbering, boozing, hibernating, holidaying economist in the process. And we all know what that means;

A riposte of empirical data and evidence! (a socialist's worst nightmare!)

First off, let's give the leftists their due; they're right.

When it comes to official foreign aid, they're right. The US government does donate on the lower end when it comes to a percentage of GDP. Forget that we don't have to donate this money in the first place. Forget that because our economy is so large and faster-growing than most we can nominally contribute more than anybody else and have it be a smaller percentage of our wealth. And forget that debt forgiveness is not included. Let's just let them have this one and go from there.

The problem is "official foreign aid" only accounts for government contributions. Thus it should be no surprise that countries like Denmark, Germany and France where the government fully accounts for 50% of GDP that they'd be more generous with their taxpayers' money. When private foreign aid is considered, the US is considerably more generous, but then again, when your citizens are not taxed to death, they can afford to be more charitable.

The second issue I have is that "official foreign aid" doesn't account for the largest foreign aid program the US has been running for years. And this foreign aid doesn't go to pits like Sudan or The Republic of Chad, but rather to our developed, 1st world nation status European friends. The program is called "The US Military." The way this program works is that we have this big huge military that is practically omnipresent...so that they don't have to have one! Things like NATO, all our military bases set up during the Cold War, not to mention we forbade Germany and Japan from having militaries, allow countries to cut back spending on tanks, guns and soldiers and allows them to spend money on foreign aid. All one needs to do is look to our Canadian friends to the north. Whilst good hockey players and normally nice folk, capable of repelling a Chinese invasion they are not. Of course they don't have to worry about that because their imperialist warmongering bible-thumping American friends to the south would not let such a thing happen to them(well, maybe Oregon). Alas, a good measure would be to see how much of our GDP is spent on military (pre-Iraq/Afghanistan War) compared to those countries who are so altruistically uber-generous with their taxpayers' money.

It seems being the world's adult....er...I mean "policeman" is not without its costs.

But the larger issue here isn't who spends what on the military or who spends the highest percentage of their GDP on foreign aid. The issue is that in the time it took me to write this blog, no doubt the estimated death number from the tsunamis has increased by 25,000 and the amount of aid the US has pledged has increased by $20 million. With such a dynamic and developing situation that could never beget an immediate finite and final response, how can the left can be so eager and sure to criticize the US and President Bush? It only belies the fact they're being infantile and using the tragedy of 100,000+ people for political gain.

I'm going back to hibernate in my cave.

9 comments:

  1. You make my point more perfectly than I could ever hope to articulate.

    By the way, I just heard Kofi got back from his vacation last night. Hmmm, by that time the US had already formed an alliance with India, Australia and Japan to help out the victims and the aid package was up to $40 million.

    Cpt. Capitalism

    ReplyDelete
  2. You make my point Quid, by blathering vulgarities and sounding like a raving lunatic. I don't even have to respond, you do all the work for me. Anybody that reads your posts is going to disregard it and associate it (negatively) with the left. And by all means, please continue to post. Any commentary you make is similar to Al Sharpton; so outlandish that it does your cause more harm than good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You're right, I didn't respond to one of your points. I don't even read the entire post. I scan it and I see f-this and f-that. B!tch, and f-you. Why would I read the whole thing more so respond to it?

    And I like the liberal "let's plagarize some cool saying making it a non-sequitir because I can't think of anything on my own." It's like Albert Einstein's "You cannot pursue peace and prepare for war at the same time." Stick with physics. I'm more than willing to have my mind changed, but I'm not going to do it without some kind of research or data to convince me. Yelling and calling me a fascist or quoting intellectuals is not going to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I literally have more important things to do with my time. Besides, you've already lost.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Quid, you are always certainly welcome to post.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When you cut the cursing and maintain a level of decorum AND maintain intellectual honesty then I'll engage you in a point to point conversation.

    Cpt. Capitalism

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ha! Yes, an economist I may be, but I also teach latin (cha cha, tango, etc.) and swing dancing. Plus I also did stand up comedy centered around economics jokes and have an eclectic mix of economic poetry.

    Chicks dig me.

    Cpt. Capitalism

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah, contemplating it on my end too. I could go on for pages, but I'm coming to the conclusion that there

    1. Ain't a lot of decent chicks out there
    2. I better settle for the decent chick I got as she really is more than decent.
    3. Don't think the doctorate in econ, undergrad in electrical engineering, with a moonlight career in lingerie modelling who plays a mean game of Halo redhead exists.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's a blog, guys. No rules about how strings of posts must go. Besides, life isn't all about economics...well, it is, but metaphorically it isn't. We can fit chicks in there somewhere too along with video games.

    Cpt. Capitalism

    ReplyDelete