I spent $60 on an out of state fishing license for South Dakota.
My economist mind went to work and after pricing fillets of fish at the local supermarket, I figured I would need to catch 7.5 sizeable fish to fillet them and earn back the savings to pay for my fishing license.
Of course I haven't caught a damn fish worth filleting, but the old adage is true;
"Unlucky in fishing, lucky in Fairburn Agate hunting."
Fairburn agates, as they call them, are South Dakota's state rock. Seemingly "nothing exciting" to the untrained eye, their intricate patterns is what makes them quite valuable in the gem world. I wouldn't have even considered them gems, but given their prices range from anywhere from $20 for El Crapo ones to $40,000 for the more insanely rare ones, they are a more profitable venture than trying to pan for gold.
In any case, your Captain has been victorious in his hunt for Fairburn Agates. Found three of them today!
Now, I know, I know. All the cappy cap girls MUST learn to control themselves, because not only is your dear Captain an accomplished fossil hunter, tornado chaser, economist, video game player AND ballroom, dancer, he is now a successful FAIRBURN AGATE HUNTER.
You may swoon now.
Sadly only 48 more hours of vacation, and then a SLOW, ENJOYABLE trip back to the communist, Al Franken, Crocus Pot Smoking Hippie Hill, POS land known as Minnesota.
Yea, more taxes and spoiled brat suburbanite children who go to Carleton. Yea.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
This One is For the Major
Ah, ballroom dancing. Something the major and I share in common and every REAL man should learn;
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Proposal Economics
Because, really, *AND I MEAN THIS! REALLY*
diamond rings are a freaking waste;
http://www.leasticoulddo.com/comic/20090828
And if girl tells you otherwise, then ask her how many starving children in Africa that $5,000 ring would feed for how many years.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Don't get me started on the waste that occurs in weddings.
diamond rings are a freaking waste;
http://www.leasticoulddo.com/comic/20090828
And if girl tells you otherwise, then ask her how many starving children in Africa that $5,000 ring would feed for how many years.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Don't get me started on the waste that occurs in weddings.
From a Reader
It is a bit lengthy, but our good reader, Broadsword, makes some deeper points if you care to read through. I am currently failing miserably at fishing and stand no chance of recouping the $60 I spent on a non-state-resident fishing license;
Sorry, somethings wrong with the text, my bad. Tried working at it and it still isn't coming through. I will try to post it later after vacation.
Cpt.
Sorry, somethings wrong with the text, my bad. Tried working at it and it still isn't coming through. I will try to post it later after vacation.
Cpt.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Oh, Isn't That Cute
I can hear the emasculated, 20 something, mommy-paid-my-way-though-college man's voice on the other end. It tells me he forgot one key important thing;
OH, THAT'S RIGHT, DUMBASS, MEDICARE IS BROKE BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT MISMANAGED IT SO HORRIBLY! Amazing how he never managed to discuss how the "Medicare" system is busted.
Wow, cartoons are cute! I think I'll convince another 20 million idiotic 20 somethings to think just like my skinny, goatee wearing-never-getting-any-pansy-ass while we vote for our next president on American Idol.
OH, THAT'S RIGHT, DUMBASS, MEDICARE IS BROKE BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT MISMANAGED IT SO HORRIBLY! Amazing how he never managed to discuss how the "Medicare" system is busted.
Wow, cartoons are cute! I think I'll convince another 20 million idiotic 20 somethings to think just like my skinny, goatee wearing-never-getting-any-pansy-ass while we vote for our next president on American Idol.
How to Argue Against Socialism and Defend Capitalism is Now Available
Howdy All,
After some editing and some serious crash coursing in MS Movie Maker my speech, "How to Argue Against Socialism and Defend Capitalism" is now available online.
This speech is quite simply A MUST for all people who believe in free markets, capitalism, freedom and true progress. It is unique (in my humble opinion) in that it is the only one of its kind where it comprehensively covers not just the logical and philosophical arguments for capitalism, but also provides your everyday person with the empirical data that supports capitalism. It also delves into the leftist mind with insights that help you understand where the left is coming from and how to engage them when debating with them.
Understand that this is the entire speech in its original format. It was taped professionally and will be aired on TV in the future, but this "professional version" will be an abbreviated version of it. I wanted to make sure the ENTIRE 2 hour 10 minute version was available in that there are many different aspects to this debate that need addressing and I wanted to cover them all.
It is a LONG seminar, but understand that in those short 2 hours and 10 minutes, you will be armed with an immense amount of data, as well as a strategic understanding of the psychology of the left that you will be immeasurably more capable of arguing for free markets, low taxes, freedom and liberty. More importantly I review different economic resources you can go to where by you can research and investigate on your own.
To download the video click here and do the "save as" thing (many thanks to FRANK! for hosting it!)
It is 237 MB so it may take a bit to download, but as always with some of my lengthier works, this will grant you the time to pour yourself a martini, light up a cigar and get comfy in your recliner.
Also, it would mean the world to me if you could mention this not only to your friends, but to Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh or somebody out there that has a little more pull than me. I ask this not for the attention, but as you will see the data and concepts in this speech really are that good, and the more people we can get to see this speech, the better armed we will be in fighting the forces of socialism in this country.
Many thanks!
El Cap-i-tan
PS-People have been asking if I can burn a copy to disk and mail if they pay a couple bucks it as they are having troubles downloading. Yes, please e-mail me at CAPTcapitalism@yahoo.com, I don't know what postage costs, but I'll charge $10 or so for the postage and my hassle.
PPS-A reader was kind enough to convert it to You Tube and here is the link if you prefer it that way.
After some editing and some serious crash coursing in MS Movie Maker my speech, "How to Argue Against Socialism and Defend Capitalism" is now available online.
This speech is quite simply A MUST for all people who believe in free markets, capitalism, freedom and true progress. It is unique (in my humble opinion) in that it is the only one of its kind where it comprehensively covers not just the logical and philosophical arguments for capitalism, but also provides your everyday person with the empirical data that supports capitalism. It also delves into the leftist mind with insights that help you understand where the left is coming from and how to engage them when debating with them.
Understand that this is the entire speech in its original format. It was taped professionally and will be aired on TV in the future, but this "professional version" will be an abbreviated version of it. I wanted to make sure the ENTIRE 2 hour 10 minute version was available in that there are many different aspects to this debate that need addressing and I wanted to cover them all.
It is a LONG seminar, but understand that in those short 2 hours and 10 minutes, you will be armed with an immense amount of data, as well as a strategic understanding of the psychology of the left that you will be immeasurably more capable of arguing for free markets, low taxes, freedom and liberty. More importantly I review different economic resources you can go to where by you can research and investigate on your own.
To download the video click here and do the "save as" thing (many thanks to FRANK! for hosting it!)
It is 237 MB so it may take a bit to download, but as always with some of my lengthier works, this will grant you the time to pour yourself a martini, light up a cigar and get comfy in your recliner.
Also, it would mean the world to me if you could mention this not only to your friends, but to Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh or somebody out there that has a little more pull than me. I ask this not for the attention, but as you will see the data and concepts in this speech really are that good, and the more people we can get to see this speech, the better armed we will be in fighting the forces of socialism in this country.
Many thanks!
El Cap-i-tan
PS-People have been asking if I can burn a copy to disk and mail if they pay a couple bucks it as they are having troubles downloading. Yes, please e-mail me at CAPTcapitalism@yahoo.com, I don't know what postage costs, but I'll charge $10 or so for the postage and my hassle.
PPS-A reader was kind enough to convert it to You Tube and here is the link if you prefer it that way.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Venture Bank
Venture Bank of Bloomington, Minnesota is one that I have interviewed with multiple times.
Of course I never received a job offer, because, well, if we were to put it simply;
I HAVE MY HEAD OUT OF MY ASS.
However, as you are no doubt fully aware, banks, bankers and the financial industry in general, prefer you to have your head up your ass, or at least be willing to french-kiss some ass in order to be employed, and that leads us to our recurring lesson about the American financial system;
It is more important that you kiss ass than kick ass.
It is more important to bend over than make profit.
It is more important to ignore reality and play ball as we all enjoy a free bailout on the American taxpayer's back as we pay ourselves enough money to buy ourselves houses and boats on Lake Minnetonka even though we don't deserve it and pose as "real" business men just like Tom Petters and Denny Hecker.
Now, I won't go into details but I interviewed twice AND offered them my Independent Analytics services and they wanted nothing to do with it. Of course, for a mere 10% of their losses THIS ONE QUARTER, I would have prevented it.
But (and pay attention to all of you thinking about entering finance/economics as a career, because it will change your minds to major in something like computer programming or engineering where your bosses have to adhere to the laws of PHYSICS and not the laws of some middle aged dumbass with too much of daddy's money in lalaland) you see it is more important to the powers that be in the finance world that you be a conforming automoton than any real leader with any real brains and any real talent with any real hope of delivering any real increases in real profitability.
I have been thinking about this on my motorcycle rides throughout the Black Hills, and it almost seems to me that the people who are currently in the positions of power in the US coroprate world almost value "conformance" and "slavery" and "power" over "profits" or "efficiency." It's enough that I am seriously considering contacting a labor economist I know to see if there is a way to measure how much value a middle aged dumbass places on conformance versus performance. Perhaps that could be a labor economist's thesis
"Conformance vs. Performance."
In any case and in all seriousness, I'm just gloating in the losses the dumbasses at "Venture" *ooooooh, isn't that exciting! "Venture" - yeah, like "ventures into bankruptcy"* "Bank" is suffering right now.
Of course, it all could have been avoided, if they had just...
aw, fuck it, never mind. I should have been born in the 20's.
Of course I never received a job offer, because, well, if we were to put it simply;
I HAVE MY HEAD OUT OF MY ASS.
However, as you are no doubt fully aware, banks, bankers and the financial industry in general, prefer you to have your head up your ass, or at least be willing to french-kiss some ass in order to be employed, and that leads us to our recurring lesson about the American financial system;
It is more important that you kiss ass than kick ass.
It is more important to bend over than make profit.
It is more important to ignore reality and play ball as we all enjoy a free bailout on the American taxpayer's back as we pay ourselves enough money to buy ourselves houses and boats on Lake Minnetonka even though we don't deserve it and pose as "real" business men just like Tom Petters and Denny Hecker.
Now, I won't go into details but I interviewed twice AND offered them my Independent Analytics services and they wanted nothing to do with it. Of course, for a mere 10% of their losses THIS ONE QUARTER, I would have prevented it.
But (and pay attention to all of you thinking about entering finance/economics as a career, because it will change your minds to major in something like computer programming or engineering where your bosses have to adhere to the laws of PHYSICS and not the laws of some middle aged dumbass with too much of daddy's money in lalaland) you see it is more important to the powers that be in the finance world that you be a conforming automoton than any real leader with any real brains and any real talent with any real hope of delivering any real increases in real profitability.
I have been thinking about this on my motorcycle rides throughout the Black Hills, and it almost seems to me that the people who are currently in the positions of power in the US coroprate world almost value "conformance" and "slavery" and "power" over "profits" or "efficiency." It's enough that I am seriously considering contacting a labor economist I know to see if there is a way to measure how much value a middle aged dumbass places on conformance versus performance. Perhaps that could be a labor economist's thesis
"Conformance vs. Performance."
In any case and in all seriousness, I'm just gloating in the losses the dumbasses at "Venture" *ooooooh, isn't that exciting! "Venture" - yeah, like "ventures into bankruptcy"* "Bank" is suffering right now.
Of course, it all could have been avoided, if they had just...
aw, fuck it, never mind. I should have been born in the 20's.
Last Days of Vacation
Hi All,
I am entering the last few days of my vacation and will thusly be spending it fishing, hiking and slowly making my way back to Minneapolis.
Posts will be light, but I will schedule a couple recession medicine cartoons here and there.
In the meantime take the full 2 hours to watch the video below, hopefully that will be enough economic data to last you a while.
Cpt.
I am entering the last few days of my vacation and will thusly be spending it fishing, hiking and slowly making my way back to Minneapolis.
Posts will be light, but I will schedule a couple recession medicine cartoons here and there.
In the meantime take the full 2 hours to watch the video below, hopefully that will be enough economic data to last you a while.
Cpt.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
The Capitalism - Socialism Speech
Howdy All,
I've finally been able to put together the video of my speech "How to Argue Against Socialism and Defend Capitalism"
Only problem is that I cannot find a video sharing service to upload it to that allows for the length and file size of the video. It is 237 MB and 2 hours 10 minutes long.
DOES ANYBODY KNOW ANY VIDEO SHARING SERVICE THAT WOULD ALLOW ME TO UPLOAD THIS???
Otherwise I will have to just burn it to DVD and mail it out (unfortunately I would have to charge for it to pay for postage and handling).
El Cap-i-tan
I've finally been able to put together the video of my speech "How to Argue Against Socialism and Defend Capitalism"
Only problem is that I cannot find a video sharing service to upload it to that allows for the length and file size of the video. It is 237 MB and 2 hours 10 minutes long.
DOES ANYBODY KNOW ANY VIDEO SHARING SERVICE THAT WOULD ALLOW ME TO UPLOAD THIS???
Otherwise I will have to just burn it to DVD and mail it out (unfortunately I would have to charge for it to pay for postage and handling).
El Cap-i-tan
Sunday, August 23, 2009
This Is Your Captain Speaking
No mention of the book, but still.
And to the CEO who said I was misrepresenting what was going on?
HA! You're a liar.
And that is how simple it is.
And to the CEO who said I was misrepresenting what was going on?
HA! You're a liar.
And that is how simple it is.
Saturday, August 22, 2009
Your Captain Has Failed
I thought I had found a dinosaur.
Turns out it was just a "brontothere" an ice age creature that had a skull of about 4 feet long.
All that being said, it was actually awesome to have Dr. Barb (the US Forest Service's official, tippy top super paleontologist) come out and dig out the ONE bone I did find and in all truthfulness, I'll be perfectly happy finding a brontothere.
Of course, Natasha found TWO dinosaurs, but that is another story.
Post post - Brontotheres were portrayed in Ice Age as the two, um...effeminate rhinos (have to skip to the video)
Turns out it was just a "brontothere" an ice age creature that had a skull of about 4 feet long.
All that being said, it was actually awesome to have Dr. Barb (the US Forest Service's official, tippy top super paleontologist) come out and dig out the ONE bone I did find and in all truthfulness, I'll be perfectly happy finding a brontothere.
Of course, Natasha found TWO dinosaurs, but that is another story.
Post post - Brontotheres were portrayed in Ice Age as the two, um...effeminate rhinos (have to skip to the video)
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Outstanding Journalism
I am not a professional journalist, but then again, I really don't believe in "professional journalism." I believe people, especially now armed with the internet, can find out the truth for themselves and don't need some worthless C- student who can't do algebra going to J school, writing for a newspaper telling them what to think.
But you have to hand it to Kate at SDA. She does this "SDA juxtaposes" theme, but this is one of the best ones where she exposes this fraud-nationalized-health-care-whore/professional protester.
You want to talk about people in the media who actually care about society, well it ain't freaking Dan Rather.
But you have to hand it to Kate at SDA. She does this "SDA juxtaposes" theme, but this is one of the best ones where she exposes this fraud-nationalized-health-care-whore/professional protester.
You want to talk about people in the media who actually care about society, well it ain't freaking Dan Rather.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
JR Hume's New Book
Many of you may not know Mr. Hume, but he is not only a regular Cappy Cap reader, but also an author and was kind enough to pull some strings for me when I was publishing my book. He specializes in military/sci-fi so for any Cappy Cap readers out there that are interested in the genre, certainly feel free to purchase his book!
I have not read it yet and am still on vacation, but certainly feel free to post any reviews!
I have not read it yet and am still on vacation, but certainly feel free to post any reviews!
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
More Proof of Socialism
I use the word socialism because that is precisely where we are not only headed, but currently are. Regardless an interesting link provided to me by a reader, Brian, provides not only additional proof that socialism is being implemented, but also proves;
1. Detroit sucks
2. Places that we crazy with the housing also suck
3. The rest of the country is paying to create jobs for Washington bureaucrats
4. Portland is a place I never plan to visit nor invest in.
The chart is a bit large, but it's insightful.
1. Detroit sucks
2. Places that we crazy with the housing also suck
3. The rest of the country is paying to create jobs for Washington bureaucrats
4. Portland is a place I never plan to visit nor invest in.
The chart is a bit large, but it's insightful.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Prius Vanity Plates
I have seen this twice now and thus it needs addressing, so please listen.
Was coming back from climbing Hat Mountain via Hill City and in front of me was a Prius with a Wellstone! bumper stick on it, as well as vanity plates that read "L S GAS." Now I had see this before where another Prius driver had "60 MPG" as his vanity plate (even though they don't get 60 MPG) and it got me thinking as I drove home.
"This is what they pride themselves off of?"
Understand vanity plates are basically a means by which you tell people something about yourself or your beliefs. Presumably it would be something of importance or pride (LUVWIFE) or, or perhaps you come up with very witty vanity plates such as (I have seen before) "TAXESUK."
But what these vanity plates tell me is that these people actually derive pride from getting faux-good gas mileage, and not only pride, but this is arguably the single greatest accomplishment or achievement in their lives;
Good gas mileage/low carbon emissions.
Now this provides a VERY interesting insight to the leftist mind, and I have alluded to this before; leftists (in a very general sense) want to avoid real work, yet are desperate to feel that they are accomplishing something with their lives. Ergo, instead of majoring in engineering, or becoming an accountant or a doctor and actually producing something or worth, they instead go into sociology, philosophy, the arts or whatever worthless "industries" the social sciences provide and instead of producing something of value to society, CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF WHAT IS VALUABLE TO SOCIETY.
Ergo the crusade over the cause.
Bono wants to help stave off poverty in Africa - no he doesn't, he wants the media attention.
Bob Geldorf wants to do the same - no he doesn't, he wants to be loved.
Jesse Jackson wants to eliminate racism - no he doesn't, he would be out of a job.
Hillary Clinton wants to help America - no she doesn't, she wants power.
And your run of the mill leftists that may not have celebrity status of those mentioned above like to join crusades to "end poverty" or "stop global warming."
No they don't. They want to wear an eco-boyscout badge to brag to other people about how good they are when they drive a Prius or drink "fair trade" coffee or buy organic groceries with a reusable bag or vote democrat/socialist.
These actions not only take no effort (or minimal) but they inevitably do nothing for society, nor produce anything of value. The only thing they do is make those that participate feel like they are doing something worthwhile and giving meaning to their lives. ie-it masks just how hollow their lives really are.
Now, admittedly this is a large brush I am stroking with, for as I've said before, I do know leftist computer programmers, I do know right wing government workers, but for those of you who have such little production and economic worth to your lives, that your primary thing you want to tell the world is that you get good gas mileage and emit less carbon than they average guy (until you have to dispose of those Prius batteries, but never mind, I forgot, it was never about the environment anyway), don't you think that before your time on this planet is up you might want to do something that really matters?
Seriously, think about it. When you die and they're reading off your ulogy, what do you want them to say?
"Skyler McFairtradecoffeedrinker was a great man. He only bought organic, fairtrade coffee from small, locally owned coffee stores that gave back to the community 30% of their pre-tax profits. He volunteered his time at the local minimalist-crapo-art museum where he lobbied the government for more taxpayer money for art nobody wanted. He wasn't a rich man, but he was rich in that his footprint was minimal on this planet. He lived in a small house with environmentally friendly insultation and spent only 79% of the US average on heating and air conditioning. He drove a moped and a Prius and emitted 56% less than the average American in carbon emissions."
You get one life on this planet and the greatest accomplishment you achieved is that you went green?
You know some people have families, some get great careers, some start businesses, some become adventurers, some go to the Sturgis rally, some start bars or restaurants, some fight in wars, some (ahem, cough cough) become economists during the day, moonlight as ballroom dance instructors during the nights, author books on their free time and become dashing Indiana Jones like characters on vacation as amateur paleontologists.
But you, on your death bed will look back at the previous 80 years and your greatest accomplishment?
You didn't eat meat. Wow, way to go.
In the meantime, I (and I'm sure all the junior, deputy, aspiring, official or otherwise economists out there) will be spending our lives achieving real things. So that when we die, we will have a smile on our faces in that we didn't waste that one, precious, finite life we had.
Was coming back from climbing Hat Mountain via Hill City and in front of me was a Prius with a Wellstone! bumper stick on it, as well as vanity plates that read "L S GAS." Now I had see this before where another Prius driver had "60 MPG" as his vanity plate (even though they don't get 60 MPG) and it got me thinking as I drove home.
"This is what they pride themselves off of?"
Understand vanity plates are basically a means by which you tell people something about yourself or your beliefs. Presumably it would be something of importance or pride (LUVWIFE) or, or perhaps you come up with very witty vanity plates such as (I have seen before) "TAXESUK."
But what these vanity plates tell me is that these people actually derive pride from getting faux-good gas mileage, and not only pride, but this is arguably the single greatest accomplishment or achievement in their lives;
Good gas mileage/low carbon emissions.
Now this provides a VERY interesting insight to the leftist mind, and I have alluded to this before; leftists (in a very general sense) want to avoid real work, yet are desperate to feel that they are accomplishing something with their lives. Ergo, instead of majoring in engineering, or becoming an accountant or a doctor and actually producing something or worth, they instead go into sociology, philosophy, the arts or whatever worthless "industries" the social sciences provide and instead of producing something of value to society, CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF WHAT IS VALUABLE TO SOCIETY.
Ergo the crusade over the cause.
Bono wants to help stave off poverty in Africa - no he doesn't, he wants the media attention.
Bob Geldorf wants to do the same - no he doesn't, he wants to be loved.
Jesse Jackson wants to eliminate racism - no he doesn't, he would be out of a job.
Hillary Clinton wants to help America - no she doesn't, she wants power.
And your run of the mill leftists that may not have celebrity status of those mentioned above like to join crusades to "end poverty" or "stop global warming."
No they don't. They want to wear an eco-boyscout badge to brag to other people about how good they are when they drive a Prius or drink "fair trade" coffee or buy organic groceries with a reusable bag or vote democrat/socialist.
These actions not only take no effort (or minimal) but they inevitably do nothing for society, nor produce anything of value. The only thing they do is make those that participate feel like they are doing something worthwhile and giving meaning to their lives. ie-it masks just how hollow their lives really are.
Now, admittedly this is a large brush I am stroking with, for as I've said before, I do know leftist computer programmers, I do know right wing government workers, but for those of you who have such little production and economic worth to your lives, that your primary thing you want to tell the world is that you get good gas mileage and emit less carbon than they average guy (until you have to dispose of those Prius batteries, but never mind, I forgot, it was never about the environment anyway), don't you think that before your time on this planet is up you might want to do something that really matters?
Seriously, think about it. When you die and they're reading off your ulogy, what do you want them to say?
"Skyler McFairtradecoffeedrinker was a great man. He only bought organic, fairtrade coffee from small, locally owned coffee stores that gave back to the community 30% of their pre-tax profits. He volunteered his time at the local minimalist-crapo-art museum where he lobbied the government for more taxpayer money for art nobody wanted. He wasn't a rich man, but he was rich in that his footprint was minimal on this planet. He lived in a small house with environmentally friendly insultation and spent only 79% of the US average on heating and air conditioning. He drove a moped and a Prius and emitted 56% less than the average American in carbon emissions."
You get one life on this planet and the greatest accomplishment you achieved is that you went green?
You know some people have families, some get great careers, some start businesses, some become adventurers, some go to the Sturgis rally, some start bars or restaurants, some fight in wars, some (ahem, cough cough) become economists during the day, moonlight as ballroom dance instructors during the nights, author books on their free time and become dashing Indiana Jones like characters on vacation as amateur paleontologists.
But you, on your death bed will look back at the previous 80 years and your greatest accomplishment?
You didn't eat meat. Wow, way to go.
In the meantime, I (and I'm sure all the junior, deputy, aspiring, official or otherwise economists out there) will be spending our lives achieving real things. So that when we die, we will have a smile on our faces in that we didn't waste that one, precious, finite life we had.
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Ron Volesky
Short post, them I'm off to climb Hat Mountain.
Saw it in the Rapid City Journal today that Ron Volesky, a potential democratic candidate for South Dakota governor wants to impose a corporate income tax.
So in short, since I'm vacation,
Volesky is a freaking moron. And the reason why is he doesn't understand basic economics.
South Dakota, as well as North Dakota and Wyoming, are states that not only have no income tax (corporate or personal), but states that have more or less escaped the recession.
Now the reason why is that corporations and people like to invest in these states since they get to keep more of their money. It also keeps money out of the hands of government, which is notorious for spending money poorly, resulting in less production per dollar. However what really pisses me off is that I was planning on moving myself and my company out here to South Dakota to escape the overly and oppressively taxed nanny state of Minnesota. But oh no, you have to ruin any fun and eliminate any state that might still somewhat adhere to the Declaration of Independence's "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"
Now, of course, guess what he wants to spend it it;
Of course, education. Arguably the most cost-ineffective government program where more money has never improved education.
And his rationalization for imposing an income tax;
"I just feel that"
Ron, quit being a god damned politician, become an adult and a statesman and KNOW before you ask for other people's money.
Saw it in the Rapid City Journal today that Ron Volesky, a potential democratic candidate for South Dakota governor wants to impose a corporate income tax.
So in short, since I'm vacation,
Volesky is a freaking moron. And the reason why is he doesn't understand basic economics.
South Dakota, as well as North Dakota and Wyoming, are states that not only have no income tax (corporate or personal), but states that have more or less escaped the recession.
Now the reason why is that corporations and people like to invest in these states since they get to keep more of their money. It also keeps money out of the hands of government, which is notorious for spending money poorly, resulting in less production per dollar. However what really pisses me off is that I was planning on moving myself and my company out here to South Dakota to escape the overly and oppressively taxed nanny state of Minnesota. But oh no, you have to ruin any fun and eliminate any state that might still somewhat adhere to the Declaration of Independence's "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"
Now, of course, guess what he wants to spend it it;
Of course, education. Arguably the most cost-ineffective government program where more money has never improved education.
And his rationalization for imposing an income tax;
"I just feel that"
Ron, quit being a god damned politician, become an adult and a statesman and KNOW before you ask for other people's money.
She's Pretty Hot for An Economist
Reader sent this and aside for it's intellectual content, she's a looker...for an economist anyway.
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Savings Rate in America
I like it when I see other people who are just as cynical as I am in that it confirms (at least to me) that I am not insane, but rather the rest of the country is. I like it even more when I see they use charts. But what I really like is when they quote Michael Hodges from the Grandfather Report (who some of you might know) was one of the primary motivators for me to start Cappy Cap.
Here's the chart;
Here's the article.
Here's the chart;
Here's the article.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Reason #249 Why Global Warming is a Hoax
Historians are going to look back and western civilization and say, "what were these idiots thinking?" From Kate.
Big Sugar
It used to be Big Oil, now it's BIG SUGAR!
President Obama better launch a congressional investigation into the price of sugar! Why those big sugar companies with their obscene profits are conspiring to increase the price of sugar, making us all suffer!
You know what we should do!? We should "boycott sugar for a day!" That way...uh...um...we'll show those big sugar companies whose...uh...boss for a..umm...day and that way, they'll just..uhh...wait for us to buy more the very next day.
President Obama better launch a congressional investigation into the price of sugar! Why those big sugar companies with their obscene profits are conspiring to increase the price of sugar, making us all suffer!
You know what we should do!? We should "boycott sugar for a day!" That way...uh...um...we'll show those big sugar companies whose...uh...boss for a..umm...day and that way, they'll just..uhh...wait for us to buy more the very next day.
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Recession Penguins
So I've been watching the Penguins of Madagascar on cable recently on my vacation and I have to admit they are freaking awesome.
"Kowolski, status report!"
"What's the trouble private?"
You have to appreciate the Skipper.
You may also be interested in;
Robot Chicken
Venture Brothers
"Kowolski, status report!"
"What's the trouble private?"
You have to appreciate the Skipper.
You may also be interested in;
Robot Chicken
Venture Brothers
Organized Protesters
This was scheduled for later, but given this article, I think I shall post it now.
I got this e-mail from the Obama campaign (I signed up for their e-mails back when Obama was campaigning against Hillary) and it is just again, more proof that the people who protest at these town hall meetings are infinitely more legitimate than the professional protesters sent out by the left;
Note a couple things;
1. I never have received ANY e-mail from ANY conservative/capitalist entity to go and contact my representative/senator EXCEPT from the REPUBLICAN PARTY ITSELF.
2. I especially NEVER received anything from President Bush's administration.
3. Do not tell me that some how these leftists organization are "noble" or "honorable" or "legit" protesters while the town hall protesters are not.
I got this e-mail from the Obama campaign (I signed up for their e-mails back when Obama was campaigning against Hillary) and it is just again, more proof that the people who protest at these town hall meetings are infinitely more legitimate than the professional protesters sent out by the left;
Note a couple things;
1. I never have received ANY e-mail from ANY conservative/capitalist entity to go and contact my representative/senator EXCEPT from the REPUBLICAN PARTY ITSELF.
2. I especially NEVER received anything from President Bush's administration.
3. Do not tell me that some how these leftists organization are "noble" or "honorable" or "legit" protesters while the town hall protesters are not.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Town Hall Protesters
Democrats should set aside their arrogance and disdain calling the town hall protesters "mobs" or "un-american" or "nazi's" and heed some simple math. They may not like the math, but it will test their ability to heed reality over their addiction to power. I'm betting they won't heed reality because they like power too much, and thus I can make this post without the worry they might actually listen and will condemn themselves nonetheless.
First off you must understand the basic paradox between leftists and conservatives as it pertains to protesting. Understand that it is the core nature of "leftism" or "socialism" to get government funds to finance whatever programs are desired. That IS the bona fide definition of "socialism;" government financing. Ergo it is part of the genetic code, its core operation to get money from the taxpayers by having the government take it via taxation. Therefore it's just a daily duty of entities like ACORN, the SEIU, the teacher's unions, etc. to lobby the government for more financing.
However, with conservatives it is not the same. Conservatives, by and large, go and actually PRODUCE something of value and in turn sell it to people who willingly part with their money in the private sector.
The doctor does surgery and gets paid willingly by the person who needs his appendix removed.
The burger flipper makes a Big Mac and is willingly paid by the person who loves that awesomely bad, yet heavenly tasting food.
The mechanic fixes your car, and you willingly pay him to replace your transmission.
Now this is a broad brush I am painting and it's not to say there isn't a doctor who is a leftist or a burger flipper who is a capitalist, but the larger point is that by its definition, it is the nature of the job of leftist to protest and lobby for more government money as there is no other way they would be employed.
This, however, presents a paradox to those of a more capitalist nature. Their jobs have really nothing to do with the government. They don't get their money from the taxpayer, they get it by producing something of value in this society and then selling it to the people who want it. Therefore, it is NOT part of their job to go and protest/lobby for more money. But what does that say if they DO come out and protest, and this is the point I'm trying to make.
Congressmen, senators and politicians of the democrat (and republican) stripe, listen to me, even though you won't.
I know you think that the "masses" want socialism as much as you do or your professional "constituents" do and you think these "town hall protesters" are just a bunch of loonies. But what you seem to fail to realize is that (and here's the math)
1 conservative/capitalist/republican/libertarian protester
equals about
25 liberal/leftist/socialist protesters
The reason why is simple;
We're too busy working and actually producing something of value to bother bitching and whining for more money unlike your leftists protesters who are too damn lazy to get real jobs and support themselves. We don't need the government. Matter of fact, the only thing we really want is for you to leave us alone so we can go and work and enjoy our lives. Therefore if we do come out and protest, you have MAJORLY effed up and better listen up.
Now I know most of the socialists in congress will not listen, but allow me to compare and contrast;
One of the protesters they've been interviewing is this 35 year old mom. Of all the different protesters, she said something that struck a cord with me and makes my point;
To go to the town hall meeting she and her husband had to do it on vacation and on their 10 year wedding anniversary.
Now if you compare this to these idiotic ACORN protesters, who are obviously not supporting themselves and living on daddy's dime (while not doubt claiming to be "independent" women)
You'll see that one is really an adult who is a contributing member to society, and the others are just effing morons who should never be allowed to vote, at MINIMUM not heeded or listened to when they come in and ask for free health care. The larger point is that the working mom HAD TO TAKE TIME OFF FROM WORK. In otherwords there is a silent majority who just plain don't have the time or the luxury to take off and protest, unlike their socialist counterparts who do.
Another reason why you should heed the 25/1 ratio is that conseravtives/capitalists/libertarians, etc. do not have PAID PROTESTERS.
I couldn't believe it when I first heard it, but upon visiting my girlfriend one time at her office, I saw a bunch of really old protesters protesting in the parking lot adjacent to her office building. I asked her "what are they protesting?"
She said, "Well the company that is in that building is a munitions manufacturer and they're protesting them for making ammunition."
"Why are they so old (they were 60+)?"
"They're paid to protest."
Only leftists could come up with something as dishonest as PAID PROTESTERS (though I will admit I can see some more obscure religious nut job outfits doing this, but the larger point being the left has a monopolgy on the "paid protesting" industry). The larger point being again, if one side of the political spectrum has to resort to PAYING protesters, it just dilutes the value of their protest. Remember you're not paid by the protester, you're paid by the vote.
And finally, why you may want to heed some of these people, with unemployment at 9.4%, people who were otherwise employed and producing, are now unemployed and pissed. And NOW they actually have the time to go and voice their demands whereas previously they couldn't. Worse for you still, they may even have the time to educate themselves about the economy, the housing crisis and how we got here and boy, are they going to get pissed when they find out not only did you BAIL OUT THE CRIMINALS, and AT YOUR CHILDRENS' expense, but now you're going to increase their taxes by another 10-15% GDP.
So look, here's the deal.
I know you've been constantly bombarded by protesters of the leftist stripe. Probably 90% of the protests, e-mails, calls, etc., are for pro-leftist causes. But you have to understand that the reason that is, is because that's how leftists make their money - government financing. It's also their job, to protest and lobby for more money. The remaining (I'd estimate) 70% of the population is out there WORKING FOR A LIVING AND DON'T HAVE TIME TO BEG FOR OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY. And when it comes to the point that you've pushed and pushed, and taken more and more of their money (not to mentioned mortgaged their children's future) and you then ask for a nationalized health care system that only fringe leftists want, you've pushed them past the brink and they will come out and protest. You've effectively made it not worth working any more.
And then you insult them, the people who actually produce all the wealth in this nation, the people who carry the non-productive classes' weight in this world by calling them "nazi's" and "un-American?"
Hoo hoo!!!
I used to think the American people were so stupid and ignorant about government finances that Obama would win another term, but by you impoverishing them, indebting them and then INSULTING THEM, there might actually be hope they wake up and see what arrogant, elitist, spoiled brat, preppy, trust fund baby bastards you really are.
Again, that ratio is 25 to 1. Try not to forget it, if you can swallow it.
First off you must understand the basic paradox between leftists and conservatives as it pertains to protesting. Understand that it is the core nature of "leftism" or "socialism" to get government funds to finance whatever programs are desired. That IS the bona fide definition of "socialism;" government financing. Ergo it is part of the genetic code, its core operation to get money from the taxpayers by having the government take it via taxation. Therefore it's just a daily duty of entities like ACORN, the SEIU, the teacher's unions, etc. to lobby the government for more financing.
However, with conservatives it is not the same. Conservatives, by and large, go and actually PRODUCE something of value and in turn sell it to people who willingly part with their money in the private sector.
The doctor does surgery and gets paid willingly by the person who needs his appendix removed.
The burger flipper makes a Big Mac and is willingly paid by the person who loves that awesomely bad, yet heavenly tasting food.
The mechanic fixes your car, and you willingly pay him to replace your transmission.
Now this is a broad brush I am painting and it's not to say there isn't a doctor who is a leftist or a burger flipper who is a capitalist, but the larger point is that by its definition, it is the nature of the job of leftist to protest and lobby for more government money as there is no other way they would be employed.
This, however, presents a paradox to those of a more capitalist nature. Their jobs have really nothing to do with the government. They don't get their money from the taxpayer, they get it by producing something of value in this society and then selling it to the people who want it. Therefore, it is NOT part of their job to go and protest/lobby for more money. But what does that say if they DO come out and protest, and this is the point I'm trying to make.
Congressmen, senators and politicians of the democrat (and republican) stripe, listen to me, even though you won't.
I know you think that the "masses" want socialism as much as you do or your professional "constituents" do and you think these "town hall protesters" are just a bunch of loonies. But what you seem to fail to realize is that (and here's the math)
1 conservative/capitalist/republican/libertarian protester
equals about
25 liberal/leftist/socialist protesters
The reason why is simple;
We're too busy working and actually producing something of value to bother bitching and whining for more money unlike your leftists protesters who are too damn lazy to get real jobs and support themselves. We don't need the government. Matter of fact, the only thing we really want is for you to leave us alone so we can go and work and enjoy our lives. Therefore if we do come out and protest, you have MAJORLY effed up and better listen up.
Now I know most of the socialists in congress will not listen, but allow me to compare and contrast;
One of the protesters they've been interviewing is this 35 year old mom. Of all the different protesters, she said something that struck a cord with me and makes my point;
To go to the town hall meeting she and her husband had to do it on vacation and on their 10 year wedding anniversary.
Now if you compare this to these idiotic ACORN protesters, who are obviously not supporting themselves and living on daddy's dime (while not doubt claiming to be "independent" women)
You'll see that one is really an adult who is a contributing member to society, and the others are just effing morons who should never be allowed to vote, at MINIMUM not heeded or listened to when they come in and ask for free health care. The larger point is that the working mom HAD TO TAKE TIME OFF FROM WORK. In otherwords there is a silent majority who just plain don't have the time or the luxury to take off and protest, unlike their socialist counterparts who do.
Another reason why you should heed the 25/1 ratio is that conseravtives/capitalists/libertarians, etc. do not have PAID PROTESTERS.
I couldn't believe it when I first heard it, but upon visiting my girlfriend one time at her office, I saw a bunch of really old protesters protesting in the parking lot adjacent to her office building. I asked her "what are they protesting?"
She said, "Well the company that is in that building is a munitions manufacturer and they're protesting them for making ammunition."
"Why are they so old (they were 60+)?"
"They're paid to protest."
Only leftists could come up with something as dishonest as PAID PROTESTERS (though I will admit I can see some more obscure religious nut job outfits doing this, but the larger point being the left has a monopolgy on the "paid protesting" industry). The larger point being again, if one side of the political spectrum has to resort to PAYING protesters, it just dilutes the value of their protest. Remember you're not paid by the protester, you're paid by the vote.
And finally, why you may want to heed some of these people, with unemployment at 9.4%, people who were otherwise employed and producing, are now unemployed and pissed. And NOW they actually have the time to go and voice their demands whereas previously they couldn't. Worse for you still, they may even have the time to educate themselves about the economy, the housing crisis and how we got here and boy, are they going to get pissed when they find out not only did you BAIL OUT THE CRIMINALS, and AT YOUR CHILDRENS' expense, but now you're going to increase their taxes by another 10-15% GDP.
So look, here's the deal.
I know you've been constantly bombarded by protesters of the leftist stripe. Probably 90% of the protests, e-mails, calls, etc., are for pro-leftist causes. But you have to understand that the reason that is, is because that's how leftists make their money - government financing. It's also their job, to protest and lobby for more money. The remaining (I'd estimate) 70% of the population is out there WORKING FOR A LIVING AND DON'T HAVE TIME TO BEG FOR OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY. And when it comes to the point that you've pushed and pushed, and taken more and more of their money (not to mentioned mortgaged their children's future) and you then ask for a nationalized health care system that only fringe leftists want, you've pushed them past the brink and they will come out and protest. You've effectively made it not worth working any more.
And then you insult them, the people who actually produce all the wealth in this nation, the people who carry the non-productive classes' weight in this world by calling them "nazi's" and "un-American?"
Hoo hoo!!!
I used to think the American people were so stupid and ignorant about government finances that Obama would win another term, but by you impoverishing them, indebting them and then INSULTING THEM, there might actually be hope they wake up and see what arrogant, elitist, spoiled brat, preppy, trust fund baby bastards you really are.
Again, that ratio is 25 to 1. Try not to forget it, if you can swallow it.
More Or Less Sums Up All Men
This is more or less the most accurate depiction of men when they wake up for the first 15 minutes of their day.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Nationalized Health Care
I have been requested to make commentary on the health care debate.
It's very simple;
Whoever in congress votes for it will lose their seats.
Those who voted for the TARP bailout/stimulus AND votes for nationalized health care will probably get lynched in the streets.
And I frankly would smile if that happened.
It's very simple;
Whoever in congress votes for it will lose their seats.
Those who voted for the TARP bailout/stimulus AND votes for nationalized health care will probably get lynched in the streets.
And I frankly would smile if that happened.
What Precisely Is Debt
I will make this short, not only because I'm on vacation, but because I genuinely believe in keeping this important lesson simple, because it is that; simple.
Debt for most of our everyday use is used to purchase large ticket items like houses or cars that we do not have the great sum of cash for, but can instead borrow the money and pay it back over time with interest.
Another form of "debt" that is in the daily use of the average person is short term debt, such as credit cards. This form of debt is not that we don't have the money now, it's just that it's easier to carry a credit or debit card as opposed to cash. This "tab" is then paid up monthly (unless of course you're like 70% of the American public and just decide to let it build up into a $50,000 credit card balance).
However, "debt" is also measured from a macro-economic perspective where we add up all the debts of corporations, people, and governments. The relevancy of this "total debt" figure is not its use as in mortgage debt or credit card debt, but rather a testament to the laziness of a nation.
Let me say that again;
"The total debt of a nation, including personal, corporate and governmental debt, is a testament or measure of the laziness of a nation."
The reason why is this,
Debt is the difference between what the people of a nation consume versus what they produce.
You see, we (or any other nation) produce a certain amount of production every year. We call this GDP. We produce GDP because that is what we not only like to consume, but trade with one another. So I go and teach dance classes and sell books, so that I might raise the money to buy food and pay for martini's.
However, if I'm a spoiled suburbanite princess, or perhaps a socialist president who wants to blow $3 trillion on social programs, we like to consume MORE than what we produce.
This results in a difference or "deficit" between what we produce and what we consume.
We finance this deficit by borrow money year after year after year....^nth power after year after year.
Ultimately these deficits accumulate into "debt"
So in short, our desire to be greedy and consume more than we produce, turns into the physical manifestation of debt. ie-Debt is the real life manifestation of human laziness.
Now, to measure how lazy a nation is we should compare our total laziness (debt) against our total production. Thankfully some nice men and women at Bloomberg have done so already;
It looks like, assuming Americans keep spending more than they make, we'll consume 4 times they amount we've produced, and that is frankly criminally greedy. No different than the bankers and scumbuckets who caused the financial crisis. But where is all this debt coming from?
You see, if we keep going along promising ourselves free food, free clothing, free shelter, free health care treating them as if they were "rights" and not what they really are (commodities) since they are "rights" nobody is going to work or "produce" for them. This not only lowers our production, but since we've (and when I say "we've" I really mean the socialists in congress and the socialist Barack Obama) promised ourselves free health care and unicorns and cars and ice cream, we will have to incur more debt relative to our production.
The long and short end of this lesson is a very simple, childish one, which most American adults seem to have a real hard time understanding;
If nobody works and everything is "paid for" nothing will be produced and even though you think you're "entitled" to these "rights," the reality is that of Soviet Russia;
Empty food shelves
Bread lines
And no, I'm sorry little Taylor, you don't get your I-Pod for Christmas. Hear some government issued coal (green coal of course).
Debt for most of our everyday use is used to purchase large ticket items like houses or cars that we do not have the great sum of cash for, but can instead borrow the money and pay it back over time with interest.
Another form of "debt" that is in the daily use of the average person is short term debt, such as credit cards. This form of debt is not that we don't have the money now, it's just that it's easier to carry a credit or debit card as opposed to cash. This "tab" is then paid up monthly (unless of course you're like 70% of the American public and just decide to let it build up into a $50,000 credit card balance).
However, "debt" is also measured from a macro-economic perspective where we add up all the debts of corporations, people, and governments. The relevancy of this "total debt" figure is not its use as in mortgage debt or credit card debt, but rather a testament to the laziness of a nation.
Let me say that again;
"The total debt of a nation, including personal, corporate and governmental debt, is a testament or measure of the laziness of a nation."
The reason why is this,
Debt is the difference between what the people of a nation consume versus what they produce.
You see, we (or any other nation) produce a certain amount of production every year. We call this GDP. We produce GDP because that is what we not only like to consume, but trade with one another. So I go and teach dance classes and sell books, so that I might raise the money to buy food and pay for martini's.
However, if I'm a spoiled suburbanite princess, or perhaps a socialist president who wants to blow $3 trillion on social programs, we like to consume MORE than what we produce.
This results in a difference or "deficit" between what we produce and what we consume.
We finance this deficit by borrow money year after year after year....^nth power after year after year.
Ultimately these deficits accumulate into "debt"
So in short, our desire to be greedy and consume more than we produce, turns into the physical manifestation of debt. ie-Debt is the real life manifestation of human laziness.
Now, to measure how lazy a nation is we should compare our total laziness (debt) against our total production. Thankfully some nice men and women at Bloomberg have done so already;
It looks like, assuming Americans keep spending more than they make, we'll consume 4 times they amount we've produced, and that is frankly criminally greedy. No different than the bankers and scumbuckets who caused the financial crisis. But where is all this debt coming from?
You see, if we keep going along promising ourselves free food, free clothing, free shelter, free health care treating them as if they were "rights" and not what they really are (commodities) since they are "rights" nobody is going to work or "produce" for them. This not only lowers our production, but since we've (and when I say "we've" I really mean the socialists in congress and the socialist Barack Obama) promised ourselves free health care and unicorns and cars and ice cream, we will have to incur more debt relative to our production.
The long and short end of this lesson is a very simple, childish one, which most American adults seem to have a real hard time understanding;
If nobody works and everything is "paid for" nothing will be produced and even though you think you're "entitled" to these "rights," the reality is that of Soviet Russia;
Empty food shelves
Bread lines
And no, I'm sorry little Taylor, you don't get your I-Pod for Christmas. Hear some government issued coal (green coal of course).
Children Cause Poverty
I've said it before, and I'll say it again children are the primary cause of poverty TODAY (I will not authorize comments about how back in 1820 "children were a blessing as they were extra labor!" simply because it's 2000 and-freaking-9)
You will never be able to convince me that the denominator in GDP per CAPITA doesn't at least have a 50% say in the matter.
You will never be able to convince me that the denominator in GDP per CAPITA doesn't at least have a 50% say in the matter.
The Man Cave
From the Major
Hello Cappy Cap readers.
While our inspirational entrepreneur and intrepid archaeologist is exploring South Dakota for fossilized remnants of extinct species, I shall regale you with a story of the evolution of an important survival tool for the human species: the Man Cave.
Pay close attention because if you take no heed, some other species may someday be searching a place formerly known as South Dakota for remnants of our fossilized remains.
Since the Dawn of Humanity, man has been a social creature. We formed small groups to cooperate in gathering food and defending our turf, females, and children from other groups of humans and predators. We huddled together for warmth in "fur piles" under the cover of trees. We generally had monogamous relationships and both parents were involved in the rearing of children. These primitive communal relationships were known as "dens".
Males of the species, though, have always been a restless, brooding, adventurous, inventive, and jealous bunch who would often squabble with other males for the choicest portion of food from the day's toil, stake claim to the most comfortable resting spot, and compete for the affections of the fairest of the less hairy gender of the species. The early dens were places of conflict as well as security.
At some point, mankind discovered the utility of caves. Caves offered shelter from the elements and a secure, defensible position. Caves were ideal for the collective species, but not for the individual male. Some men would find an isolated part of the cave where he could momentarily escape the din of communal activity. This nook was his "man-cave". In his man-cave, he could explore the deepest thoughts of his primitive intellect or scrawl crude pictures of people, animals and trees on the cave walls with chalk stone. Before long, he would invariably be interrupted by combative males, doting females, or screaming infants. No, the collective cave would not work and finding respite outside the cave would expose the pensive male to danger and discomfort.
Over time, humans developed an improvement to this situation. The nimble-fingered female companion sewed together the hides of slaughtered mammals with sinews twisted into tight threads, using bones or claws as a needle. Mankind had discovered a better dwelling place: the teepee. Now he could segregate his living space, his female, and her litter from other males. Therein, he could keep material possessions obtained through his own wit and wile. The mere presence of another male in his teepee was grounds for personal combat.
Alas, this solution was doomed to failure as well. Wherefore man achieved isolation from his fellow males, he was still relegated to share his space with the clinging female and the annoying younglings.
Over thousands of years, man learned to build semi-permanent dwellings made from sod, mud bricks, ice blocks, or animal dung. He learned how to fashion multiple compartments within his family-unit domicile. One part of the hut would be for sleeping and, occasionally, more intimate activities. Another part of the hut would be for eating which would keep insects and the smell of rotting foodstuffs apart from the sleeping area.
The mud dwelling community would have a latrine area away from the living spaces. Even in the age of ancient man, crap time was mutually understood to be a moment of isolation and quiet reflection. During this time, man's mind would be free to think deep thoughts. It is believed by anthropologists that during these brief potty periods, mankind developed its most innovative ideas and observations - a tradition which remains unbroken to this day.
This is not the end of the story of man's evolution of thought. While the toidy is a good place for thought, the moments are too brief and too smelly to dream big dreams. Man had to come up with a better solution.
Eventually, man developed better weapons for self defense and larger, more compartmentalized domiciles made from straw, grass, or logs. Agricultural production enabled him to sustain himself and his family without venturesome hunting and gathering. He now had the means and the time to construct places of solitude within his private home. The females of the species, occupied with the tasks of caring for the young and preparing meals, remained in the sleeping or eating quarters. The male, exhausted from the day's toil, found respite in his own room. There he would draw pictures, build tiny models of inventive ideas, and clear his mind for deep thoughts. In recognition of the safety and comfort man received from the original fur pile (but without all the scritching and clawing), he called his restful place a "den."
The den ushered in a renaissance of thought. Mankind developed written language from his drawings. Then he developed advanced tools and weapons, architecture, science, and eventually shopping malls.
But I get ahead of myself. Before the advent of the shopping mall, mankind developed productive commerce and trade. Through natural capitalism, the most industrious and resourceful of men (all of whom had dens) amassed wealth. With this wealth came the development of social classes.
Regardless of social class and attainment, men remained generally similar in their attitudes and aspirations. Wealthy men had private places called "libraries" or "studies" filled with books which he either wrote or read. Middle class men had their dens which contained a comfortable chair, a book, and some form of entertainment. Lower class men and their families were clustered in ghettoes so densely populated that they could not have a den or a library. For this reason, they invented the "pub."
Although the "pub" didn't have much privacy, it afforded men an opportunity to unwind and escape the screaming of the infants and the plump wife. There, comforted by pints of ale, he could commiserate with his chums, fantasize about sex with the barmaid, and immerse himself in cheerful songs and gay revelry with his fellow underachievers. This social adaptation, while functional as a relief of stress, afforded little opportunity for deep thoughts. Ergo, the lower class was stuck in a cycle of waking, working, eating, drinking, shagging, sleeping, waking, and wondering why there were so many screaming infants in his house.
The wealthiest of men built mansions or castles. In these edifices, man placed several hundred feet of wood or stone between himself and his wife and children while remaining under the same roof. With his wealth, he could temporarily placate his nagging and clingy partner. She would be given a "sewing room" in which she could cuss and pout and soothe her loneliness with each stitch. She might also have a "parlor" where she and other women could congregate. "Parlor" comes from the French word "to talk". Mind you, there was very little "thinking" going on in this room - just a lot of talking. The talk mostly concerned their husbands, the latest fashions, and gossip about women who were not in attendance.
As they died, the middle class tradesmen and upper class entrepreneurs and landowners passed on their assets to their sons. The youthful knaves had been neglected by both parents and showered with placating gifts; they possessed things they had not earned and could not appreciate. This is when mankind took an awful turn.
These spoiled, overgrown infants began to feel "entitled" to things they wanted. Feeling isolated and lonely, they emulated the behavior of the lower classes (but shunned their company). They formed establishments called "closed pubs" which was abbreviated as "clubs". The clubs of the foppish popinjays had libraries filled with thousands of books, none of which had been read or written by any of the club members. They smoked cigars, played games of billiards and golf (which they adopted from the poor), and drank refined beverages such as Scotch Whiskey, Gin, and Cognac. The middle class tradesmen had clubs too which became secret societies in which they emulated the ostentatious lifestyles of the wealthy. These clubs eventually evolved into trade unions, the Freemasons, the Elks, the Moose lodges, etc.
In the absence of men and secure in luxury of a home with nannies to care for the children, wealthy women became free to develop their own clubs too. They joined sewing circles, bridge clubs, relief societies, and temperance unions. Soon, with their newly acquired "deep thoughts" and with strength in numbers, women began to "flex their muscles."
It was all downhill from there. Women withheld sexual favors in exchange for concessions from their emasculated spouses. Then they acquired the right to vote and banned alcohol which was destroying their husbands' productivity and making them downright disagreeable. This move did not turn out as they had planned. Many men and even many women began to involve themselves in uncommitted sexual relationships lubricated by the Devil's Brew in hidden clubs. Men with tools called "Thompson submachineguns" began to kill one another.
Society's vices caught up with us. The lack of productive behavior and unwise decisions by privileged club members in high political office resulted in a Great War which was really just an excuse for millions of men to get out of the house. Then came the Great Depression which set us back several centuries in social and economic development. Next came a Greater War which kept men away from home for 4-10 years. One group of men, in an isolated den in New Mexico, invented the Atomic Bomb and ended the war.
At the conclusion of that war, men actually began to miss their spouses. They returned to their countries and bought pre-fabricated houses - a revival of the teepee but with aluminum siding. Next came some more working, drinking, shagging, and waking up to ever increasing numbers of screaming infants. Women, who previously had jobs during the war, missed the freedom and independence, thus causing more nagging. Men had to re-invent the den!
But society had changed forever. The 1960s came and women found ways to avoid churning out puppies and kittens on an annual basis. More and more marriages ended in divorce as men grated against the confinement with women in small apartments. Drugs replaced alcohol as a diversion. Then there were more wars. Then came Nixon, Ford, and Carter.
For the brief decade of the 1980s, it appeared that we might be getting ourselves back on track. Men became men again: prosperous, resourceful, and pensive. Women were entering college at ever increasing numbers, trying to think deep thoughts.
But then all the screaming infants from the post-war period came of age. The neglected, spiteful, and entitled little brats began to rob productive society of its resources. Armed with the power of democracy which they scarcely understood, they exercised freedom without responsibility and claimed that things which were formerly known as "privileges" are now considered "rights."
Human evolution has reached a dangerous precipice. The small cooperative groups called "family", which sustained us for millennia, began to vanish. The monogamous social arrangement which had heretofore been mutually worthwhile has disintegrated.
The pace of our work has accelerated in the futile attempt to service the ever-growing system of entitlements, leaving men no time to think or read or dream during waste excretion. The television became the central location where man and woman and child occupied their minds with empty images, robbing them of creative thoughts. Men again sought solace by engaging in diversionary activities in which their women were generally not interested, like football, video games, poker, and blogging. Individual men, working by themselves or in small groups with other men (but no women) thought the big thoughts which ushered in the internet age.
Now we find ourselves in a destructive equilibrium where men in a relationship seek privacy and cannot find it. Females relentlessly try to wrest men from secluded thinking spaces where they hope to find ways to make millions of dollars selling things nobody really wants but everybody absolutely must have.
Mankind's future is threatened because we have shunned our basic biological programming. Man has been four billion years in the making, having evolved from single-celled organisms to cell clusters to gastropods to fish to reptiles to amphibians to mammals to GEICO insurance salesmen. Although our social structure has evolved at an incredibly swift pace, as biological entities we are little changed from the creatures we were 10,000 years ago - a blink of the evolutionary eye. Man's mental capacity is no different now than it was when we were squatting over a hole in the African savannah, pushing out breakfast, and wondering which animal a particular cluster of stars reminded us of.
As a species, we mistakenly think men have outgrown the need for our own space - our den, our study, our library....our Man-Cave.
POWinCA
Sunday, August 09, 2009
Americana Community Bank
It's too rich to pass up.
About 2 years ago now I interviewed at a local Minnesota community bank, "Americana Community Bank" based in Sleepy Eye, Minnesota. It was for a position that was (let's just say) significantly higher ranked than the senior credit analyst position I had worked before.
Forefront of the battery of questions I had for those middle aged, gray haired men interviewing me was whether they had inoculated themselves against the insane real estate loans that all the other community banks in Minnesota had seemingly jumped on the bandwagon for, only condemning themselves to taking TARP money and parasiting off the taxpayer.
They assured me that they had a "quality" group of clients and that their clients would never default on their loans and were of the highest quality and caliber.
I thought, "good, maybe this bank has its head out of its ass and these guys might actually know their stuff."
The first sign they didn't was that I didn't get the job.
The second was when I was just informed (about 3 hours ago) that THEY GAVE THE JOB TO MY FORMER BOSS PHYLLIS who (regular readers know) is the incredibly incompetent boss that I highlight in my book that literally brought her previous employer to the verge of bankruptcy.
Now, most people would call "sour grapes" on me.
That this whole $2 trillion dollar debacle that has caused the worst economic recession since the Great Depression and the worst non-war deficits in the history of the US, was purely a figment of our imaginations and I am just a bitter former employee and when I point out and highlight these verminous scum I'm just doing it for vengeance and there's no legitimacy to my doing so (even though the country is hurting greatly and if these people were somehow "removed" from society we would never have to worry about this stuff again).
Well guess what happened to Americana Community Bank's profitability once my former boss took over?
Wow, great performance guys. Great performance. Only spoiled brat middle aged, trust fund babies who (while listening to Jim Morrison, majoring in art history) had mommy and daddy pay their ways through life could have accomplished such ineptitude.
Now this behooves a ton of questions, but most prominently in my mind (and probably yours)
1. DID YOU MORONS AT AMERICANA COMMUNITY BANK BOTHER TO LOOK AT THE PROFITABILITY OF THE PREVIOUS BANK PHYLLIS WORKED AT? Huh, did it occur to you that maybe, just maybe, you were hiring an idiotic moron who couldn't make a good loan if it was guaranteed by the Federal Reserve? That the reason her previous employer was applying for TARP funds was because of the enormous ineptitude of the moron you just hired. And not only that, but WHAT THE EF DID YOU THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN TO YOUR PROFITABILITY WHEN YOU BROUGHT THAT VERITABLE RETARDED VAMPIRE ON BOARD? No, don't listen to the kid who established his ability to predict economic events that would have kept you out of the red. No, hire the MORON who cause the red at another bank.
2. Once again, is it the goal of corporate America to be nice or right? I will readily admit that I rock the boat. I am NOT a conforming, nice, compliant, Minnesota-nice employee. And that's why I predicted this housing debacle years before it happened. But it really burns the question are you American corporations in the business of making money, or just maintaining the status quo and not insulting people? Do you live in reality or do you just try not to insult people? This (mark my words) is why American corporations will inevitably fail and become as nible and efficient as their decaying, Japanese kieretsu counterparts.
3. To the shareholders and owners of Americana Community Bank, would you have been better off hiring me instead, and not only hiring me, but replacing all those middle aged, gray haired, morons that interviewed me with me or the likes of me? Seriously, I work for about 1/2 of your entire corporate executive team's combined salary, and I'm more effective. It's a deal (arrogantly proposed, I admit), but still a deal that would have made you immeasurably better off. You wouldn't have lost money!
Oh, but that's right. Being nice, maintaining the status quo, and (perhaps maybe in the short future) parasiting off the taxpayers, is preferred over being a profitable corporation? Yuck, that icky gross money!
Morons.
The larger point is this.
The finance sector of the US (or any) economy is a vital part of the economy.
It allocates capital (theoretically) EFFICIENTLY. It funds the ventures that are most promising and profitable and therefore (if done right) finances the industries and companies that will help produce the goods and services (not to mention provide jobs) to such an optimal extent, it will increase standards of living and economic power of the country that it becomes the envy of the world (which the US once was).
Sadly, the industry attracts only the most worthless, incompetent and inefficient people today. So incompetent and inefficient, they hire 100% USDA certified moronic heffers like Phyllis who have no aim of being a good allocator of capital, but want to "wheel and deal" to make commission.
So god bless ya, Americana Community Bank. You've decided to pursue schmoozing and wheeldealing over living in reality. Keeping entrenched corporate yes-men enriched, even if it means that someday you'll apply for TARP funds and live off the taxpayer like leeches so you can feign being "real" businessmen like little girls "play Barbie."
Any time I can turn that company around.
But something tells me your arrogance and pride will get in the way.
Enjoy bankruptcy, but make sure you impoverish several innocent taxpayers on the way.
Update #2
DOUBLY RICH
FROM A READER!
They're already under a cease and desist order by the Feds!
Oh God, when I get back from vacation I am paying Phyllis a personal visit.
About 2 years ago now I interviewed at a local Minnesota community bank, "Americana Community Bank" based in Sleepy Eye, Minnesota. It was for a position that was (let's just say) significantly higher ranked than the senior credit analyst position I had worked before.
Forefront of the battery of questions I had for those middle aged, gray haired men interviewing me was whether they had inoculated themselves against the insane real estate loans that all the other community banks in Minnesota had seemingly jumped on the bandwagon for, only condemning themselves to taking TARP money and parasiting off the taxpayer.
They assured me that they had a "quality" group of clients and that their clients would never default on their loans and were of the highest quality and caliber.
I thought, "good, maybe this bank has its head out of its ass and these guys might actually know their stuff."
The first sign they didn't was that I didn't get the job.
The second was when I was just informed (about 3 hours ago) that THEY GAVE THE JOB TO MY FORMER BOSS PHYLLIS who (regular readers know) is the incredibly incompetent boss that I highlight in my book that literally brought her previous employer to the verge of bankruptcy.
Now, most people would call "sour grapes" on me.
That this whole $2 trillion dollar debacle that has caused the worst economic recession since the Great Depression and the worst non-war deficits in the history of the US, was purely a figment of our imaginations and I am just a bitter former employee and when I point out and highlight these verminous scum I'm just doing it for vengeance and there's no legitimacy to my doing so (even though the country is hurting greatly and if these people were somehow "removed" from society we would never have to worry about this stuff again).
Well guess what happened to Americana Community Bank's profitability once my former boss took over?
Wow, great performance guys. Great performance. Only spoiled brat middle aged, trust fund babies who (while listening to Jim Morrison, majoring in art history) had mommy and daddy pay their ways through life could have accomplished such ineptitude.
Now this behooves a ton of questions, but most prominently in my mind (and probably yours)
1. DID YOU MORONS AT AMERICANA COMMUNITY BANK BOTHER TO LOOK AT THE PROFITABILITY OF THE PREVIOUS BANK PHYLLIS WORKED AT? Huh, did it occur to you that maybe, just maybe, you were hiring an idiotic moron who couldn't make a good loan if it was guaranteed by the Federal Reserve? That the reason her previous employer was applying for TARP funds was because of the enormous ineptitude of the moron you just hired. And not only that, but WHAT THE EF DID YOU THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN TO YOUR PROFITABILITY WHEN YOU BROUGHT THAT VERITABLE RETARDED VAMPIRE ON BOARD? No, don't listen to the kid who established his ability to predict economic events that would have kept you out of the red. No, hire the MORON who cause the red at another bank.
2. Once again, is it the goal of corporate America to be nice or right? I will readily admit that I rock the boat. I am NOT a conforming, nice, compliant, Minnesota-nice employee. And that's why I predicted this housing debacle years before it happened. But it really burns the question are you American corporations in the business of making money, or just maintaining the status quo and not insulting people? Do you live in reality or do you just try not to insult people? This (mark my words) is why American corporations will inevitably fail and become as nible and efficient as their decaying, Japanese kieretsu counterparts.
3. To the shareholders and owners of Americana Community Bank, would you have been better off hiring me instead, and not only hiring me, but replacing all those middle aged, gray haired, morons that interviewed me with me or the likes of me? Seriously, I work for about 1/2 of your entire corporate executive team's combined salary, and I'm more effective. It's a deal (arrogantly proposed, I admit), but still a deal that would have made you immeasurably better off. You wouldn't have lost money!
Oh, but that's right. Being nice, maintaining the status quo, and (perhaps maybe in the short future) parasiting off the taxpayers, is preferred over being a profitable corporation? Yuck, that icky gross money!
Morons.
The larger point is this.
The finance sector of the US (or any) economy is a vital part of the economy.
It allocates capital (theoretically) EFFICIENTLY. It funds the ventures that are most promising and profitable and therefore (if done right) finances the industries and companies that will help produce the goods and services (not to mention provide jobs) to such an optimal extent, it will increase standards of living and economic power of the country that it becomes the envy of the world (which the US once was).
Sadly, the industry attracts only the most worthless, incompetent and inefficient people today. So incompetent and inefficient, they hire 100% USDA certified moronic heffers like Phyllis who have no aim of being a good allocator of capital, but want to "wheel and deal" to make commission.
So god bless ya, Americana Community Bank. You've decided to pursue schmoozing and wheeldealing over living in reality. Keeping entrenched corporate yes-men enriched, even if it means that someday you'll apply for TARP funds and live off the taxpayer like leeches so you can feign being "real" businessmen like little girls "play Barbie."
Any time I can turn that company around.
But something tells me your arrogance and pride will get in the way.
Enjoy bankruptcy, but make sure you impoverish several innocent taxpayers on the way.
Update #2
DOUBLY RICH
FROM A READER!
They're already under a cease and desist order by the Feds!
Oh God, when I get back from vacation I am paying Phyllis a personal visit.
What Bugs Bunny Teaches Us About Professor Gates
In a never ending relentless pursuit to provide genuine, 100% guaranteed relief from the recession (unlike the stimulus package from your Saint Obama) I present to you another episode of Paleo-American greatness, Bugs Bunny;
I for one however am shocked and INSULTED by the mockery of my ethnicity, and that be Irish. Why the pure "institutional" racism towards the Irish just glows ever so brightly as the sun as to how we Irish-Americans were type-casted into drunks or cops. Why I have never been so insulted in my life and demand this cartoon be banned...oh, wait a minute, I'm not "professor" Hates..err..I mean "Gates."
I for one however am shocked and INSULTED by the mockery of my ethnicity, and that be Irish. Why the pure "institutional" racism towards the Irish just glows ever so brightly as the sun as to how we Irish-Americans were type-casted into drunks or cops. Why I have never been so insulted in my life and demand this cartoon be banned...oh, wait a minute, I'm not "professor" Hates..err..I mean "Gates."
Friday, August 07, 2009
Your Don't Deserve Those Fine Machines
I had eluded to this before during a trip I took to Arizona where just north of Phoenix there was no limit to the number of Baby Boomers who bought Shelby Mustang GT's, but opted to use only 2 of the 8 cylinders those cars have, clogging traffic to a stand-stillish 45 MPH on the interstate, however, let me tell you of another machine these blue hairs don't deserve;
Harley's.
I'm out in the Wyoming/South Dakota area during the depths of the Sturgis rally and as far as I can tell the Harley riders break down into three camps;
1. Youngish Harley riders who know how to drive, appreciate the rally and go 5-10 MPH over the speed limit.
2. Veteran Harley riders who have gone to the rally when they were younger, are seasons drivers and go 5 MPH over the speed limit.
3. Sunday morning, spectator sport, preppy Harley riders who are now having a midlife crisis and decided, as a hobby to buy a Harley, drive it out to the rally and piss off practically everybody on the road by driving 10-15 MPH UNDER THE SPEED LIMIT.
This is particularly pronounced when you're in the moutains, there's no 4 lanes which would permit you to pass, and never any pass lanes, because the road is too curvy. And there you sit, going 40 MPH down a 7% grade moutain, wearing out your brakes because some suburbanite preppy schmuck with too much money on his hands decided to buy a 900 v-twin, of which 50 cc's he's deciding only to use.
Now I drive arguably the smallest interstate legal bike, a Ninja 250. Just a short breath away from a moped, but I can still pass these $20,000 machines simply because I realize there's more than 1 gear to my bike.
Ergo, fellow Cappy Cap readers and motorcycling enthusiasts, I make a proposal. To make the roads safer, let a lone more efficient, if you pass a Harley rider in a;
1. 250 cc motorcycle
2. A truck
3. A semi truck
4. A cement truck
5. A moped
6. A mobile home (which actually do go faster than these spectator sport Harley riders)
7. Running on foot,
You are allowed to pull them over, commandeer their bike and report them to the local authorities where they will be arrested for abusing a Harley and in turn be given what they're only a decade away from driving anyway;
A Rascal.
And come to think of it, I've seen some rascals driving faster than most of these guys.
Harley's.
I'm out in the Wyoming/South Dakota area during the depths of the Sturgis rally and as far as I can tell the Harley riders break down into three camps;
1. Youngish Harley riders who know how to drive, appreciate the rally and go 5-10 MPH over the speed limit.
2. Veteran Harley riders who have gone to the rally when they were younger, are seasons drivers and go 5 MPH over the speed limit.
3. Sunday morning, spectator sport, preppy Harley riders who are now having a midlife crisis and decided, as a hobby to buy a Harley, drive it out to the rally and piss off practically everybody on the road by driving 10-15 MPH UNDER THE SPEED LIMIT.
This is particularly pronounced when you're in the moutains, there's no 4 lanes which would permit you to pass, and never any pass lanes, because the road is too curvy. And there you sit, going 40 MPH down a 7% grade moutain, wearing out your brakes because some suburbanite preppy schmuck with too much money on his hands decided to buy a 900 v-twin, of which 50 cc's he's deciding only to use.
Now I drive arguably the smallest interstate legal bike, a Ninja 250. Just a short breath away from a moped, but I can still pass these $20,000 machines simply because I realize there's more than 1 gear to my bike.
Ergo, fellow Cappy Cap readers and motorcycling enthusiasts, I make a proposal. To make the roads safer, let a lone more efficient, if you pass a Harley rider in a;
1. 250 cc motorcycle
2. A truck
3. A semi truck
4. A cement truck
5. A moped
6. A mobile home (which actually do go faster than these spectator sport Harley riders)
7. Running on foot,
You are allowed to pull them over, commandeer their bike and report them to the local authorities where they will be arrested for abusing a Harley and in turn be given what they're only a decade away from driving anyway;
A Rascal.
And come to think of it, I've seen some rascals driving faster than most of these guys.
Thursday, August 06, 2009
The USDA Finds Out that Children are Expensive
A hat tip to the good men and women at Booker Rising who are probably saying, "No sh!t Sherlock"
For Once Minnesotans Have Their Heads Out of ....
Well, they're doctors at the Mayo clinic, so they might be a wee bit smarter than the average bear.
Wednesday, August 05, 2009
No, Wisconsin People ARE That Universally Bad at Driving
A Public Service Announcement from the Captain
(cue PSA music)
I just wanted to let my Minnesotan brethren know that apparently what we thought was untrue;
Wisconsin people do NOT come to our state and drive slow on purpose just to piss us off.
They do it all over.
They reason why?
They're really bad drivers.
Just an observation I've had driving through the various states on vacation.
So don't take it personally. Understand they're just a little slow on the road here, in other states, and in general, just a little slow.
You may continue on with your day now.
Thank you.
(cue PSA music)
I just wanted to let my Minnesotan brethren know that apparently what we thought was untrue;
Wisconsin people do NOT come to our state and drive slow on purpose just to piss us off.
They do it all over.
They reason why?
They're really bad drivers.
Just an observation I've had driving through the various states on vacation.
So don't take it personally. Understand they're just a little slow on the road here, in other states, and in general, just a little slow.
You may continue on with your day now.
Thank you.
Tuesday, August 04, 2009
Enterprise Rent A Car
I meant to make this post a year ago, but got sidetracked and procrastinated with getting a You Tube account. I only wished I posted it earlier to cost them more business.
Never, ever, rent from Enterprise. And here's not only one reason why you should never rent from Enterprise;
but another reason why you should never rent from Enterprise.
I will spare you the details, but their customer service sucks, they won't repair anything with the car unless "they" can prove you didn't purposely damage their car (because obviously that's what you sent out to do), and if you're stranded in the middle of Wyoming with two flats BECAUSE THEIR TIRES WERE BALD AT 2/32's OF THICKNESS WHEN THEY LEFT THE LOT, they won't help you and will instead leave it up to you to find a way to get the disabled car 150 miles to Rapid City.
This is not hyperbole, this is not rhetoric, this is just plain simple truth. Do not rent from Enterprise ever.
Oh, and to anybody from Enterprise's marketing department that might have googled or Binged your name, yeah, you effed with the wrong guy.
Never, ever, rent from Enterprise. And here's not only one reason why you should never rent from Enterprise;
but another reason why you should never rent from Enterprise.
I will spare you the details, but their customer service sucks, they won't repair anything with the car unless "they" can prove you didn't purposely damage their car (because obviously that's what you sent out to do), and if you're stranded in the middle of Wyoming with two flats BECAUSE THEIR TIRES WERE BALD AT 2/32's OF THICKNESS WHEN THEY LEFT THE LOT, they won't help you and will instead leave it up to you to find a way to get the disabled car 150 miles to Rapid City.
This is not hyperbole, this is not rhetoric, this is just plain simple truth. Do not rent from Enterprise ever.
Oh, and to anybody from Enterprise's marketing department that might have googled or Binged your name, yeah, you effed with the wrong guy.
Monday, August 03, 2009
Saturday, August 01, 2009
Black Hills Playhouse
They asked for it, and so they're now going to get it.
I went to a play today at the Black Hills Playhouse, a theater located in the Black Hills.
Because of their decrepit and aging buildings (they were built during the CCC days) they are facing some repair troubles, to which the governor of South Dakota has recommended moving the playhouse elsewhere in Custer State Park.
Now if you read this article here, it seems that South Dakota governor, Mike Rounds is more than willing to have the Black Hills Playhouse continue on and stay in the Black Hills, preferably in facilities that are not falling apart (and TRUST ME they ARE falling apart, I just saw it 7 hours ago). To which you would think those at the Black Hills Playhouse would feel great about.
Wrong.
Before the play started, up come the manager of the playhouse to make a "cute" announcement about how long the Black Hills Playhouse had been around. A 20 something young lady, standing on her veritable soap box saying;
It had been around longer than the Guthrie in Minneapolis
Some place in Kansas City.
Outlasting the Steppenwolf (I don't care how it's spelled)
Outlasting 12 presidents
and...
15 governors.
The entire crowd laughed and clapped, which suggested to me something of a local politics was at hand (and that I was in about the only liberal crowd in South Dakota...though that was tipped off by the only Obama bumper stickers and effeminate men I saw there).
Regardless, sure enough she told us that Governor Rounds wanted to move the playhouse and that if we liked theater we should call him up and protest, and then triumphantly marched off stage to applause.
Originally, I thought perhaps Governor Rounds was planning on axing the Black Hills Playhouse, but upon doing my research and finding out he just wanted them moved from their tetanus-infested facilities, I got angry. Not because this was another group of leftists begging for more money for something nobody wants and therefore needs to be subsidized by the taxpayer, but just the outright lie I was delivered.
Ergo, let me tell you about the Black Hill's Playhouse.
1. The play was not that good. It was downright awful. Sure some funny parts, but nothing great. It was a musical. I don't blame the actors, I blame the writers. Robert DeNiro couldn't have made that one fly.
2. The arrogance of these people to be so damn pouty and DEMAND those decrepit facilities be upgraded when it's obvious they should be torn down and moved to a new location (if for anything for their own damn safety) angers me. They're on the government's dime (not to mention charity of many donators) and they act like they're choosers when they are beggars.
3. The larger point, understand that the "arts" and "theater" are inexorably intertwined with government financing because IT COULD NOT EXIST ON IT'S OWN. And the reason why is that NOBODY WANTS IT. If it was in demand like I-Pods or Harry Potter movies, they wouldn't need to go to the South Dakota taxpayer like a bum with a cup in their hand. People would willingly pay an adequate price to not only repair/buy new facilities, but generate a profit for its owners and benefactors. However (and now it's time once again boys and girls to break out a pencil and a piece of paper for the Captain is about to make a very important point) all this is, is a group of adult children who want to be paid for their hobby instead of getting a real job like the rest of us and making something the rest of society wants. You see, you morons, you schmucks who go in and work those jobs like programmers, or burger flippers or plumbers, you're idiots. You should get jobs you like, like being an actor, a singer, a writer, an ice cream taster, or a beer judge or a professional video game player. And if society won't pay for it, then DEMAND the government subsidize you. And not only subsidize you, complain when the government offers you new facilities instead of upgrading your un-upgradable, old Chernobyl-esque facilities.
However, also understand it is not just the actors, board members and other people who want a government financed hobby, but those that attend the theater and demand the price be subsidized for them that are to blame. I'll give kudos to those who donate thousands of dollars, they are not only willing to bear the full costs it would take to successfully operate the facilities, but subsidize those who won't. But for those that complain, but don't donate, but rather insist the taxpayer subsidize their evening out to a horrible musical, shame on you.
In the meantime, given cut backs and the recession I think those at the Black Hills Playhouse are going to (SHOCK AND HORROR) have to accept the NEW facilities instead of having the old crumbling ones refurnished. And imagine that, some people...like 6 million...have lost their jobs, but they complain about having to move. I think a better thing would be to contact Governor Rounds and demand these spoiled brats become grown ups and either sink or swim without any subsidies and face the cold hard realities of life us normal adults do every day.
I went to a play today at the Black Hills Playhouse, a theater located in the Black Hills.
Because of their decrepit and aging buildings (they were built during the CCC days) they are facing some repair troubles, to which the governor of South Dakota has recommended moving the playhouse elsewhere in Custer State Park.
Now if you read this article here, it seems that South Dakota governor, Mike Rounds is more than willing to have the Black Hills Playhouse continue on and stay in the Black Hills, preferably in facilities that are not falling apart (and TRUST ME they ARE falling apart, I just saw it 7 hours ago). To which you would think those at the Black Hills Playhouse would feel great about.
Wrong.
Before the play started, up come the manager of the playhouse to make a "cute" announcement about how long the Black Hills Playhouse had been around. A 20 something young lady, standing on her veritable soap box saying;
It had been around longer than the Guthrie in Minneapolis
Some place in Kansas City.
Outlasting the Steppenwolf (I don't care how it's spelled)
Outlasting 12 presidents
and...
15 governors.
The entire crowd laughed and clapped, which suggested to me something of a local politics was at hand (and that I was in about the only liberal crowd in South Dakota...though that was tipped off by the only Obama bumper stickers and effeminate men I saw there).
Regardless, sure enough she told us that Governor Rounds wanted to move the playhouse and that if we liked theater we should call him up and protest, and then triumphantly marched off stage to applause.
Originally, I thought perhaps Governor Rounds was planning on axing the Black Hills Playhouse, but upon doing my research and finding out he just wanted them moved from their tetanus-infested facilities, I got angry. Not because this was another group of leftists begging for more money for something nobody wants and therefore needs to be subsidized by the taxpayer, but just the outright lie I was delivered.
Ergo, let me tell you about the Black Hill's Playhouse.
1. The play was not that good. It was downright awful. Sure some funny parts, but nothing great. It was a musical. I don't blame the actors, I blame the writers. Robert DeNiro couldn't have made that one fly.
2. The arrogance of these people to be so damn pouty and DEMAND those decrepit facilities be upgraded when it's obvious they should be torn down and moved to a new location (if for anything for their own damn safety) angers me. They're on the government's dime (not to mention charity of many donators) and they act like they're choosers when they are beggars.
3. The larger point, understand that the "arts" and "theater" are inexorably intertwined with government financing because IT COULD NOT EXIST ON IT'S OWN. And the reason why is that NOBODY WANTS IT. If it was in demand like I-Pods or Harry Potter movies, they wouldn't need to go to the South Dakota taxpayer like a bum with a cup in their hand. People would willingly pay an adequate price to not only repair/buy new facilities, but generate a profit for its owners and benefactors. However (and now it's time once again boys and girls to break out a pencil and a piece of paper for the Captain is about to make a very important point) all this is, is a group of adult children who want to be paid for their hobby instead of getting a real job like the rest of us and making something the rest of society wants. You see, you morons, you schmucks who go in and work those jobs like programmers, or burger flippers or plumbers, you're idiots. You should get jobs you like, like being an actor, a singer, a writer, an ice cream taster, or a beer judge or a professional video game player. And if society won't pay for it, then DEMAND the government subsidize you. And not only subsidize you, complain when the government offers you new facilities instead of upgrading your un-upgradable, old Chernobyl-esque facilities.
However, also understand it is not just the actors, board members and other people who want a government financed hobby, but those that attend the theater and demand the price be subsidized for them that are to blame. I'll give kudos to those who donate thousands of dollars, they are not only willing to bear the full costs it would take to successfully operate the facilities, but subsidize those who won't. But for those that complain, but don't donate, but rather insist the taxpayer subsidize their evening out to a horrible musical, shame on you.
In the meantime, given cut backs and the recession I think those at the Black Hills Playhouse are going to (SHOCK AND HORROR) have to accept the NEW facilities instead of having the old crumbling ones refurnished. And imagine that, some people...like 6 million...have lost their jobs, but they complain about having to move. I think a better thing would be to contact Governor Rounds and demand these spoiled brats become grown ups and either sink or swim without any subsidies and face the cold hard realities of life us normal adults do every day.
"Spirit of Innovation Key to the Future"
God, you got to love this.
In his typical pretty-pony-saying-pretty-words-way Obama says "the spirit of innovation is key to the future."
Well, what precisely is the "key to innovation" then?
Oh, that's right, the massive profits that come with those innovations that he has since criminalized.
They just can't think two dominoes ahead of of what the consequences are of their actions.
Brilliant job, O.
In his typical pretty-pony-saying-pretty-words-way Obama says "the spirit of innovation is key to the future."
Well, what precisely is the "key to innovation" then?
Oh, that's right, the massive profits that come with those innovations that he has since criminalized.
They just can't think two dominoes ahead of of what the consequences are of their actions.
Brilliant job, O.