I Have A Question About Diversity

I was told diversity is good.  Forget the character of people, long as they're different, it's good.  ie-Diversity has merit and worth unto itself, even beyond whether or not the individual people are nothing more than criminals or parasites.  You killed a ton of people?  That's OK, you're diversity!

So answer me this (and really focus on the logic here because it gets complicated), when raccoons invade Germany and they're not native, that is by the definition of diversity, ADDING DIVERSITY to the country's animal kingdom, right?  That's good, right?  An increase in the number of types of animules is by definition increasing its diversity, right?

Well how can an increase in the number of animules pose a THREAT to biodiversity when there mere existence increases it????

Or is it that animules and humans are different and increases in human diversity is good, while increases in animule diversity is bad?  But aren't humans considered animules, especially by the leftists that not only champion secular darwinism and insist we're nothing more than animules, and that human diversity is good?  But wait, increases in animule diveristy is bad, and since humans are animules we should trap invasive human species, but WAIT human diversity is good, which means we don't trap invasive species, but that would not increase diversity, which...animules...diversity....humans...bad...good...DOES    NOT   COMPUTE!!!!!!

Serves me right to apply logic to leftists' thinking.