This is arguably one of the most important videos I've made and would go a long way in getting normal, everyday blue collar, hard working democrats to realize what their party stands for, what they're voting for, and what the consequences will be. I suggest not only listening to it yourselves so you understand "what is socialism" but forwarding it to anybody who could stand to learn the same economic lesson.
My sites and relevant links below:
Podcast
Asshole Consulting
YouTube Channel
Twitter
Books by Aaron
Older Brother!!!!
Amazon Affiliate
Nay Capn, they were always Communist and Joseph McCarthy was right all along. That's why they tar and feather his name to this day and say everything that isn't left is Nazis and Hitler.
ReplyDeleteActually WE American nationals (not U.S. citizens) do own 100% of our Labor...
ReplyDelete"There is a clear distinction between `profit' and `wages', or a compensation for labor. Compensation for labor (wages) cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. The word `profit', as ordinarily used, means the gain made upon any business or investment -- a different thing altogether from the mere compensation for labor."
Oliver v. Halstead 86 S.E. Rep 2nd 85e9
"The 16th Amendment does not authorize laying of an income tax upon one person for the income derived solely from another."[wages]
McCutchin v Commissioner of IRS, 159 F2d,
"Tips are gifts and therefore are not taxable."
Olk v. United States, February 18, 1975, Las Vegas, Nevada.
"Property acquired by gift is excluded from gross income."
Commissioner of IRS v Duberstein, 80 5. Ct. 1190.
"Income has been taken to mean the same thing as used in the Corporation Excise Tax of 1909 (36 Stat. 112). The worker does not receive a profit or gain from his/her labors-merely an equal exchange of funds for services"
Brushaber v Union Pacific R/R 240 U.S. I, 17; 36 S.Ct. 236, 241.
"Decided cases have made the distinction between wages and income and have refused to equate the two."
Central Illinois Publishing Service v. U.S., 435 U.S. 31
"..whatever may constitute income, therefore, must have the essential feature of gain to the recipient. This was true at the time of Eisner V Macomber, it was true under section 22(a) of the Internal Revenue code of 1938, and it is likewise true under Section 61(a) of the IRS code of 1954. If there is not gain, there is not income, CONGRESS HAS TAXED INCOME, NOT COMPENSATION"!!!
Conner v US 303 F supp 1187 Federal District court, Houston, never overruled
"Income" has been taken to mean the same thing as used in the Corporation Excise Tax Act of 1909, in the Sixteenth Amendment and in the various revenue acts subsequently passed ...."
Bowers vs Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 US 174D
"The conclusion reached in the Pollock Case did not in any degree involve holding that income taxes generically and necessarily came within the class of direct taxes on property, but on the contrary recognized the fact that taxation on income was in its nature an excise entitled to be enforced as such..."
Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1
"An income tax is neither a property tax nor a tax on occupations of common right, but is an EXCISE tax...The legislature may declare as 'privileged' and tax as such for state revenue, those pursuits not matters of common right, but it has no power to declare as a 'privilege' and tax for revenue purposes, occupations that are of common right."
Simms v. Ahrens, 271 SW 720
"Reasonable compensation for labor or services rendered is not profit"
Laureldale Cemetery Assoc. vs Matthews, 345 Pa. 239;
"Among these unalienable rights, as proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant, the right (to) any lawful business or vocation, in any manner not inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculties, so as to give them their highest enjoyment...It has been well said that, THE PROPERTY WHICH EVERY MAN HAS IS HIS OWN LABOR, AS IT IS THE ORIGINAL FOUNDATION OF ALL OTHER PROPERTY SO IT IS THE MOST SACRED AND INVIOLABLE..."
Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746. 1883
Actually WE American Nationals (not US citizens)do own 100% of our Labor...
ReplyDelete"Among these unalienable rights, as proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant, the right (to) any lawful business or vocation, in any manner not inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculties, so as to give them their highest enjoyment...It has been well said that, THE PROPERTY WHICH EVERY MAN HAS IS HIS OWN LABOR, AS IT IS THE ORIGINAL FOUNDATION OF ALL OTHER PROPERTY SO IT IS THE MOST SACRED AND INVIOLABLE..."
Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746. 1883
"Reasonable compensation for labor or services rendered is not profit"
Laureldale Cemetery Assoc. vs Matthews, 345 Pa. 239;
"Tips are gifts and therefore are not taxable."
Olk v. United States, February 18, 1975, Las Vegas, Nevada.
"The 16th Amendment does not authorize laying of an income tax upon one person for the income derived solely from another."[wages]
McCutchin v Commissioner of IRS, 159 F2d,
".....Maybe society has its head out of its ass?...."
ReplyDeleteNot today, pal.
Sun., 7/29-----25-year old Braves pitcher comes w/in one out of a no-no against Dodgers. Obviously best start of his career.
WHILE HE WAS ON THE MOUND, SJW's dig though his tweets from when he was 18-19 years old and find this:
"In at least seven tweets, Newcomb used a homophobic slur. One of Newcomb’s tweets contains a song lyric that has a racially offensive term in it. We’ve linked to the tweets above, but be advised that the language used in those tweets is offensive."
(He said "fag" and the lyric had "nigga", obviously)
Naturally, both he and spineless Braves management are forced to grovel.
No, you were prescient @ The Decline. We're done. If there is any hope, it is that comments run more than 9-1 against this "GOTCHA" game played by the SJW's.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/sean-newcomb-offensive-tweets-surface-middle-no-hitter-attempt-231023555.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lj8fP5wCy9g&t=635s never forget what will happen to you if these caring socialist get serious power.
ReplyDelete