"independence"
is so laughably dependent on forced wealth transfers to their women's studies programs, women's shelters, and the cacophony of non-profit, public sector, social service claptrap make work jobs that they're not only the epitome of dependent, but hypocrites as well.
To provide empirical evidence to this fact, I made a chart.
I know this chart may be a bit complicated because it has "the Maths," but don't let that bother you're little feminist brains. You just claim "the Maths" is a disease created by the patriarchy.
Oh, by the way ladies. I've been meaning to ask you something. Instead of this whole "I pay taxes, government bureaucrats take a piece, and only a portion gets passed onto the intended recipient" perhaps we could cut out the middle man. I mean, why don't I just write you a check directly. Or better yet, how about I hook up an IV to myself and I'll just pump blood into your system? Ooo! Ooo! Better idea even than that. How about you get genetically engineered to become a lamprey-like human and you can just suck off my lifeblood like the biological parasite you are? That would be incredibly more efficient than the racket we have set up today.
Perhaps that is an idea. Using the Lamprey as the official mascot of feminism.
POST POST - Ug, really? Do I have to do this???? The $1.2 trillion is not real. I don't care to bother to try to calculate all the money. It really is a lazy, guesstimate. The point is that feminists HAVE TAKEN money and the Manosphere has taken NOTHING.
"but don't let that bother you're little feminist brains."
ReplyDeleteBetter fix that Captain, especially when trying to highlight your smarts.
The Hyena is more appropiate, but why cann't we have both? http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/the-international-symbol-of-feminism/
ReplyDeleteThe Hyena is more appropiate http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/the-international-symbol-of-feminism/
ReplyDeleteBut why cann't we have both?
Like a lamprey needs a fish?
ReplyDeleteHow do you estimate the $1.2 trillion?
ReplyDeleteThis is great, but could you specify where the number comes from? I'd love to use this but it needs a reference...
ReplyDeleteInstead of this whole "I pay taxes, government bureaucrats take a piece, and only a portion gets passed onto the intended recipient" perhaps we could cut out the middle man. I mean, why don't I just write you a check directly. Or better yet, how about I hook up an IV to myself and I'll just pump blood into your system?
ReplyDeleteYou're getting married? Who's the lucky girl?
That fish hasn't got the hang of movember
ReplyDeleteYour chart is contrived Aaron. You say that it has "math" in it.
ReplyDeleteUnless you provide a time reference and you indicate the time period over which the spendings accumulated into 1.2 Trillion dollars, I will have to say that your chart contains more propanganda than actual math.
So your chart begs the question:
This $1.2 Trillion spans over how long ? 1 year, 10 years ? 30 years ?
If you give us the time span, only then will you be able to claim that there is serious "math" in it.
Here you go Cappy.
ReplyDeletehttp://mjperry.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/americas-real-fiscal-problem-federal.html
Roughly 70% of the US federal budget is spent on transfers to individuals while 80% of that goes to females.
If you're concerned about the veracity of the $1.2B figure, simply draw a graph of the RATIO of money transferred from gov't to Feminist causes versus that to manosphere...then it doesn't matter what the actual number is because divide by zero......plus if you could fit it on the screen it would look even more impressive!
ReplyDeleteFeminist are reptilian tares, undermining men and using our state to transfer our wealth of natural resources to themselves. You can't stop the truth.
ReplyDeleteDidn't you say in your book that it was OK for men to take advantage of government programs while they "Enjoy The Decline"? I loved the book, by the way.
ReplyDelete