What he should be saying is lets cut business taxes, so that we CAN SHRINK THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT. What a nightmare! Geithner has never worked in the private sector. He has no clue that the private sector, is the producing aspect of a country. And just how much larger does the US government have to become? I always thought the former USSR was a bad economic model. This Giethner character and Bailout Ben, are a true real life version of Freddy Krueger`s nightmare on main street. Can the last American working in the private sector, please turn out the lights.
All I can say about Geithner is that he validates Schumpeter's analysis of capitalism turning into a bureaucratic nightmare. i.e. he DEFINES the emergence of socialism out of the internalization of innovations within firms versus within markets. A sign of the apocalypse if you wish.
Naturally, his sophistry appeals to an already molded constituency, and is cacophony to those who have evolved beyond a 3rd-grade understanding of the world, or aren't intentional parasites. (See: unionized labor)
Geithner is insane. Not raising taxes to cover spending increases constitutes a "tax benefit"? Rarely does a politician so clearly state that he thinks your income is rightfully owned by the government, not you.
What he should be saying is lets cut business taxes, so that we CAN SHRINK THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT.
ReplyDeleteWhat a nightmare!
Geithner has never worked in the private sector. He has no clue that the private sector, is the producing aspect of a country. And just how much larger does the US government have to become? I always thought the former USSR was a bad economic model.
This Giethner character and Bailout Ben, are a true real life version of Freddy Krueger`s nightmare on main street.
Can the last American working in the private sector, please turn out the lights.
All I can say about Geithner is that he validates Schumpeter's analysis of capitalism turning into a bureaucratic nightmare. i.e. he DEFINES the emergence of socialism out of the internalization of innovations within firms versus within markets. A sign of the apocalypse if you wish.
ReplyDeleteNaturally, his sophistry appeals to an already molded constituency, and is cacophony to those who have evolved beyond a 3rd-grade understanding of the world, or aren't intentional parasites. (See: unionized labor)
Plenty of room for you in Western Canada Cap'n
ReplyDeleteGeithner is insane. Not raising taxes to cover spending increases constitutes a "tax benefit"? Rarely does a politician so clearly state that he thinks your income is rightfully owned by the government, not you.
ReplyDeleteApparently if they decide not to take your money from you, it's a handout. News to me.
ReplyDeleteI hope Geithner gets hit by a bus.
Ryan...I volunteer to be the driver of that bus!!
ReplyDelete