And don't argue with me on this. They are. I've been watching, looking, and running an informal toll in my brain looking at those on the Right versus those on the left and I'm sorry, I'd rather court the fair lasses on the Right.
It orginally started when I saw the Wellstone Memorial on TV and the eclectic mix of college students, environmentalists socialists, etc., make complete asses of themselves and tip the senatorial battle to Norm Coleman. Within 48 hours I was at the Republican victory party at the Radisson in suburban Minnesota looking at a bevy of hot and fine ladies. And the looks battle could not have been more lopsided.
Ever since then I've been driving on the interstate, looking at people with Bush bumper stickers, versus Kerry bumper stickers. Bush yard signs versus Kerry yard signs. Support our troops decals, versus "Bush Lied, How Many Died" signs. Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin versus...well...anybody.
And again, I say this not to be inciteful, but because it's true, I really think people on the Right are better looking folk than those on the left.
Now this could be for any number of reasons, but without pondering it much I have a sort of half-ass theory; Darwinism. Specifically, survival of the fittest.
You see, democrats do not like competition. They like fairness and a level playing field. Heck, they don't even like to play, they just like ties and we all go home winners. Republicans know better. Republicans know that competition and survival of the fittest is what governs the world. It's not how we'd like it, that's just how it is.
Don't believe me? Well no doubt you're a union member seeing your job being obsoleted by foreign competition and want the government to come in an protect your job (yet your loyalty to diversity and the global community runs contradictory to this...oh you poor confused leftists).
Anyway, in the competition for mating, you try to go home with the penguin with the poofiest chest. The cardinal with the brightest red. Of the man with the biggest....car. Either way, democrats fair badly in these categories on both sexes. The men are usually wimpy, skinny emasculated men who are in touch with their feelings and couldn't protect their family from an assailant if they wanted to. The women are (frankly) fat and not attractive and thus can only attract the bottom bracket of men.
There is also the element of income. Women are more attacted to men with larger....incomes. Why settle for the wiener who is a professional peace activist, living at home with his parents, when you can have the MBA graduate with a $70,000 a year job lined up. And as you make more money, people have a tendency to vote Republican more often because of the ass-raping they receive in the upper income brackets. Thus, the more attractive women can get a higher income, and thereby, more likely to be Republican guy.
The end result; the ideologies attractive different people based on how prone they are to engage in competition. And ugly people don't like engaging in competition, be it for mates or jobs in the shunned private sector. Alas, why you have not only ugly liberals, but the majority of liberals employed in sectors of the economy that require no competition; non-profit, government, charities, academia.
Either way, more proof for my theory came in the mail yesterday when the Minneapolis democrats sent in the mail their list of preferred candidates. I don't have a scanner, but I went online and put together a mural of their "beauty" queens and kings. Sure, there's a couple good looking people in there, but most are ugly.
I shall point out a couple other things, for they seem to be consistentcies across the left;
The women wear those glasses that just scream "LIBERAL." I don't know if it's the glasses or that they're all fat and the cheecks combined with glasses give it the liberal effect.
The men look gay. I mean this not as an affront to gay people. I like gays. I'm for gay marriage. It's just usually they men aren't gay, they're just feminine.
Every guy in this picture I could take in a fight in their prime, except for the old guy. He seems to be an old-school democrat who might have played some football and worked in the private sector.
Not one girl in this picture would I sleep with, even in their prime, and even if I was paid a tidy sum.
Anyway, yes, blanketing statements across the board. But I'll see if I can scrounge up the Republican ones and do a comparison.
10 comments:
if you need any help-- I'm never one to shy away from beatind down an old man.
Heh, this post won't generate any controversy at all! :)
Largely because I fathom you're right. I lived in the boondocks of Wisconsin and the girls were fine regardless of politics at 18, but sheesh, hit a 10 year reunion, and you're right, everybody has a magnetic ribbon on their truck and they weren't pretty.
I'll even agree that the more "education" you get the more you tend to be democrat. However that's if the "education" is in a crap field where the only way to get a job is to get a doctorate, and you'll only end up employed in the government or academia. Alas, of course you're going to have highly educated communciations doctorates and English professors. But they'll all still be morons compared to the lowly bachelors in engineering.
Yes, I have.
And that's just what I want, a model who doesn't know who Alan Greenspan is and performed at Live 8.
I've met dogs with more intelligence.
Some Guy,
Yes, you do have a point. My natural response to overtly attractive women is "what's wrong with them?" Alas, yes, most models and actresses are bombshells, but idiots none the less.
I have a theory that the more attractive a women is the less intelligent she tends to be as they are shielded from the harsher realities of life. From Daddy to Hubby, one might say. Easier promotions. More men asking her out, buying her stuff. But all in all, the girls i've seen from the left (not that there ain't some hotties) I'd rather fancy the righter leaning ones.
However, an oxymoron does exist, if you find a female economist, 99% chance she's a capitalist.
Brad Man,
HA! How do I know you're a horn dog?
Forget ye thine commentary on 505025?
http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2005/05/505025.html#comments
I'm not saying all women who are attractive are dumb. I'm saying based on my experiences which have now lasted 17 years of chasing girls, the better looking ones TEND to be less attractive, less independent, less interesting, less entertaining, and less intriguing than those that were not so attractive.
This isn't to say that all good looking dames are idiots, but at the same time I cannot afford to ignore the realities that I face.
And if you must know I even tried tolerating somebody who just wasn't as smart as I needed her to be. Sweet heart of a woman, but she was a knock out, she was an idiot, she kept getting promotions, and was clueless about the real world around her, she couldn't even relate to people who struggled to find employment. Oddly just always seemed to come naturally to her.
If I had a couple of shots of Jack Daniels in me, the blonde on the top of the picture would be do-able. Not take her around my friends do-able, but 'hit it in the parking lot of the club' do-able.
TC
Make sure you zoom in on the picture. A wise pilot friend of mine said the attractiveness of a female is inversely related to distance.
Piatta,
If you can send me a picture of yourself, it would be very telling.
Post a Comment