Yet more evidence (as if any more was needed) that extending the franchise to women has been one of human history's most catastrophically idiotic ideas.
Lol, in my country we have mandatory army draft and people are screaming about threat of Russia. At the same time those same people welcome tens of thousands of people who hate western civilazion and except western men to fight against Russia if they attacked. What a joke they are.
To think of how many peshmerga female warriors that have been beheaded by the same group of male goat f%$#@*s that these western women want to let them turn the western world into the shit-hole of the region they are from.
You may say that but if you saw a woman being raped by an immigrant, I think you'd intervene. After all, it's difficult to justify letting her get raped by the thought that "given her age demographic, there's a 68% chance she voted for a jerk politician and policies that allowed that immigrant to enter the country." Also, not defending her is allowing the immigrant to get what he wants undeterred, and where's the value in that? You can be pissed at the demographic. You can point out that women, in general, tend to vote for policies that are destructive. But I doubt you would not defend one. I share your view that women should consider the negative consequences of their actions. Men do so primarily because we experience the negative consequences while women are, by and large, shielded from adverse consequences by the paternal culture so many of them despise. [To paraphrase the movie As Good As It Gets, women are like men, except without reason or accountability]
The only women I will defend are the women of my "tribe". My wife, daughter, sister, mom, and mother-in-law. All are strong women and not indoctrinated to the BS of the left. The left will get you killed ladies, anyway they can. Always have and always will. Study your history and you will see it's true. Now back to Enjoying My Decline!
You may say that but if you saw a woman being raped by an immigrant, I think you'd intervene.
You think wrong.
1. Odds are overwhelming that such a woman deliberately put herself into the situation that got her raped (we call it "chasing bad boys for 'gina tingles"). If that's "blaming the victim," then I'm perfectly fine with that. Not all "victims" are innocent.
2. Many a would-be white knight has gotten himself maimed or killed intervening on behalf of a woman not his wife or a blood relative - only to have the damsel turn on him.
Ask any cop who has ever tried to "rescue" a woman from a DV assault and wound up getting attacked by the "victim."
Anonymous said... You may say that but if you saw a woman being raped by an immigrant, I think you'd intervene... But I doubt you would not defend one...
Only if the woman in question was someone whom I knew (a relative or friend). Otherwise, you are WRONG. Women don't need a man -- they said so. (When I was in my twenties, MANY young women told me this to my face in the most sneering and hateful manner to make sure I 'understood' it.) They have proven that the only 'man' they want in their life is 'Big Daddy' Government (and his White Knights in Blue Uniforms). That's okay with me. This is the society that they have created, and I have learned to live in it. Chivalry is dead because feminism (and the women who supported it) killed it. Women never foresaw the results of that, just the same as they never foresaw MGTOW -- possibly because they didn't want to believe it (and besides the fact that women have amply demonstrated that they are very short-sighted and don't have much concern for what lies beyond the present time). Many men have become so repulsed by the toxic women of this society (and Marriage 2.0, 'no-fault' divorce, and the 50%+ odds of being ruined by them), that they have found other reasons (than wife and family) to give purpose to their lives. And that number of men is growing all the time. You don't think that men would actually ignore a woman in danger or distress, Anonymous? Well, women thought that they could deny men justice and treat men like sh*t and nothing would change, either. They were wrong -- and so are you.
7 comments:
Yet more evidence (as if any more was needed) that extending the franchise to women has been one of human history's most catastrophically idiotic ideas.
Lol, in my country we have mandatory army draft and people are screaming about threat of Russia. At the same time those same people welcome tens of thousands of people who hate western civilazion and except western men to fight against Russia if they attacked. What a joke they are.
To think of how many peshmerga female warriors that have been beheaded by the same group of male goat f%$#@*s that these western women want to let them turn the western world into the shit-hole of the region they are from.
You may say that but if you saw a woman being raped by an immigrant, I think you'd intervene. After all, it's difficult to justify letting her get raped by the thought that "given her age demographic, there's a 68% chance she voted for a jerk politician and policies that allowed that immigrant to enter the country." Also, not defending her is allowing the immigrant to get what he wants undeterred, and where's the value in that?
You can be pissed at the demographic. You can point out that women, in general, tend to vote for policies that are destructive. But I doubt you would not defend one. I share your view that women should consider the negative consequences of their actions. Men do so primarily because we experience the negative consequences while women are, by and large, shielded from adverse consequences by the paternal culture so many of them despise. [To paraphrase the movie As Good As It Gets, women are like men, except without reason or accountability]
The only women I will defend are the women of my "tribe". My wife, daughter, sister, mom, and mother-in-law. All are strong women and not indoctrinated to the BS of the left. The left will get you killed ladies, anyway they can. Always have and always will. Study your history and you will see it's true. Now back to Enjoying My Decline!
You may say that but if you saw a woman being raped by an immigrant, I think you'd intervene.
You think wrong.
1. Odds are overwhelming that such a woman deliberately put herself into the situation that got her raped (we call it "chasing bad boys for 'gina tingles"). If that's "blaming the victim," then I'm perfectly fine with that. Not all "victims" are innocent.
2. Many a would-be white knight has gotten himself maimed or killed intervening on behalf of a woman not his wife or a blood relative - only to have the damsel turn on him.
Ask any cop who has ever tried to "rescue" a woman from a DV assault and wound up getting attacked by the "victim."
Anonymous said...
You may say that but if you saw a woman being raped by an immigrant, I think you'd intervene...
But I doubt you would not defend one...
Only if the woman in question was someone whom I knew (a relative or friend). Otherwise, you are WRONG.
Women don't need a man -- they said so. (When I was in my twenties, MANY young women told me this to my face in the most sneering and hateful manner to make sure I 'understood' it.)
They have proven that the only 'man' they want in their life is 'Big Daddy' Government (and his White Knights in Blue Uniforms).
That's okay with me. This is the society that they have created, and I have learned to live in it.
Chivalry is dead because feminism (and the women who supported it) killed it. Women never foresaw the results of that, just the same as they never foresaw MGTOW -- possibly because they didn't want to believe it (and besides the fact that women have amply demonstrated that they are very short-sighted and don't have much concern for what lies beyond the present time).
Many men have become so repulsed by the toxic women of this society (and Marriage 2.0, 'no-fault' divorce, and the 50%+ odds of being ruined by them), that they have found other reasons (than wife and family) to give purpose to their lives. And that number of men is growing all the time.
You don't think that men would actually ignore a woman in danger or distress, Anonymous? Well, women thought that they could deny men justice and treat men like sh*t and nothing would change, either.
They were wrong -- and so are you.
Post a Comment