"there have been some unforeseen consequences with women transitioning into the work force. And it is directly caused by the progressive credentialism arms race Corporate America foists upon any aspiring applicants. Because in order to "make it" in Corporate America you effectively have to forfeit your entire youth to a masters degree, dedicate what remains of it to a career, and stick with it for the rest of your life. Men have more or less done this since the beginning of time, but for women it leaves them with very little time for family formation, unfairly forcing them to choose between a family and a career. But an interesting resulting phenomenon has come from this - women have chosen careerism over family formation."
4 comments:
It's like Jordan Peterson once said. The question isn't, "Why aren't more women [working 120+ hours per week as corporate executives who never get a moment's rest]?" The question is, "Why the Hell is anybody willing to work under those conditions at all?"
Apparently some people are stupid.
If those women stay single and don't engage in any kind of sexual activity that could end up being a good form of population control.
What do you mean "some"!!!!
@ Tal
"If those women stay single and don't engage in any kind of sexual activity that could end up being a good form of population control."
You are not up on current events apparently. The west, China and Russia already have de-population spanning the last 3 generations. I don't know any woman who is a power executive making bank and doing the hours that go along with it, but I know plenty who are deep in debt working some lame ass public sector job (and bitching to any who will listen).
Post a Comment