Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Why Socialists are Passive Aggressive

Because unlike honest thieves, they're cowards:

4 comments:

Alex in Montana said...

How many times have we read the lisping Jive Ass Frat Boy (aka Mohammed Osama Arafat Obama) is passive aggressive. His wife's got a bigger pair than he does.

Chris Miles said...

Bullseye dude, bullseye...

Anonymous said...

Loser socialists are passive aggressive. Winner socialists, who worked hard in school and found out how rigged the system is only after graduation, are openly aggressive against an unfair order of the world. Conservatives are consistently mediocre and average and already have equality in that sense, so they ignore both the losers and winners until they find themselves surrounded and beaten to a pulp. Their equality ironically gets redistributed as the progressives see fit.

This isn't hard to figure out. Conservatives need only find a way to align the angry "closet fascist" socialists to their side to win, the kids who grind high GPA's in school when they could have been partying and networking. Talent and hierarchy are most bizarrely embraced by the left's high/low alliance, while conservatives reject authority and replace it with conformity.

I used to think leftists were better organized because of momentum, due to their being sponsored by Soviet money and professional influence. Now, I think the modern left is actually a left/right alliance against moderate conservative weaklings. Trump stood out because he probably leans for a middle/right alliance against the loser left variant, but this is still an unnatural alliance for as long as conservatives don't have a reputable college ranking system and career networks tied to said system.

Anonymous said...

An interesting article for you to read:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/business/dealbook/an-expensive-law-degree-and-no-place-to-use-it.html?_r=1