A 20 something ditz Clarey "Just Rub the Wrong Way"
Getting in fights because you didn't wear Cavarrici pants in the 80's
Getting in fights because you wore velcro K-Mart shoes in the 80's
Cappy rips apart his entire high school as Facebook proves they all turned out to be losers
"My amazing children"
When "Harley ownership" is the "pinnacle" of your life.
Cappy kicking around starting a charity
Torturing yourself over purchasing luxury shampoo
The Left's new strategy of accepting and deserving punishment because you're white or male.
AND MORE in THIS EPISODE of The Clarey Podcast
Also listen to The Clarey Podcast on iTunes and Stitcher!
Sunday, November 30, 2014
You are Free to Kill Yourself at Any Time
Nobody is stopping you.
And ladies, I do not want to hear about how "feminism is just the equal treatment of men."
On a related note of arrogant whites who think themselves better than everything.
And ladies, I do not want to hear about how "feminism is just the equal treatment of men."
On a related note of arrogant whites who think themselves better than everything.
Friday, November 28, 2014
OPEC's Not Torpedoing the Bakken...Yet
A big concern right now is that the Saudis and OPEC in general have been flooding the market with oil, driving prices down in the hopes of driving Bakken (and other) US oil firms out of business. The Saudi's can pump oil and remain profitable at a much lower price than their American counterparts, and it is speculated that the recent and dramatic drop in gas prices has been due to OPEC flooding the market.
The opposite is quite true. It's American oil flooding the market that threatens themselves;
Source
You combine this with fears of slowing global economic growth andcrusaderist wimps green-conscious-fuel-saving Americans and Europeans, demand for oil has also gone down, driving prices down.
OPEC is planning a closed door meeting in which they will collude like the monopolies you'd all like to think "Big Oil Companies" collude like in an attempt to cut oil production and jack up prices. Thankfully they all hate each other almost as much as they hate the US, so they will unlikely cut oil production despite what they say.
The real issue is whether fracking technologies can be improved that American oil producers can still remain profitable at lower oil prices, and I believe since they largely employ the last vestiges of real, innovative and industrious Americans, they can. Better yet, the good news is that "peak oil" or a "post oil world" has been postponed beyond our lifetimes. We will not run out of oil in our lifetimes AND even if the mideast runs out, we got enough here in the US to last.
It is one of the rare bits of good news to enjoy in today's world, especially given this reality will continue to piss off environmentalists for the rest of their lives.
The opposite is quite true. It's American oil flooding the market that threatens themselves;
Source
You combine this with fears of slowing global economic growth and
OPEC is planning a closed door meeting in which they will collude like the monopolies you'd all like to think "Big Oil Companies" collude like in an attempt to cut oil production and jack up prices. Thankfully they all hate each other almost as much as they hate the US, so they will unlikely cut oil production despite what they say.
The real issue is whether fracking technologies can be improved that American oil producers can still remain profitable at lower oil prices, and I believe since they largely employ the last vestiges of real, innovative and industrious Americans, they can. Better yet, the good news is that "peak oil" or a "post oil world" has been postponed beyond our lifetimes. We will not run out of oil in our lifetimes AND even if the mideast runs out, we got enough here in the US to last.
It is one of the rare bits of good news to enjoy in today's world, especially given this reality will continue to piss off environmentalists for the rest of their lives.
Thursday, November 27, 2014
Round House Kicking Chick Cop Show!
Writing books during security
Leadership comes from those who have nothing left to lose
Crossfit is a cult
"State of Affairs" a new ROUNDHOUSEKICKINGCHICKCOPSHOW!
"Clit lit" and "Clit flicks"
A woman author divorces her husband for a fictional character she created
Cappy's drug addiction to "progressive adventure" and how it will ruin him.
and MORE
in THIS EPISODE of The Clarey Podcast!
Leadership comes from those who have nothing left to lose
Crossfit is a cult
"State of Affairs" a new ROUNDHOUSEKICKINGCHICKCOPSHOW!
"Clit lit" and "Clit flicks"
A woman author divorces her husband for a fictional character she created
Cappy's drug addiction to "progressive adventure" and how it will ruin him.
and MORE
in THIS EPISODE of The Clarey Podcast!
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
The Contemporary Art Bubble
An amazing article from a classically trained artist who is predicting the collapse of the "contemporary" art bubble. He uses some interesting statistics, one in particular where there is five times as many galleries displaying art made in the past 60 years as there are galleries displaying art in the past 4,000.
Anyway, I am not art collector, but my general rule of thumb is, "If I can do it, then it isn't art." And sadly, that's most art today.
Anyway, I am not art collector, but my general rule of thumb is, "If I can do it, then it isn't art." And sadly, that's most art today.
The Children's Wing of the Libertarian Party
I am a libertarian. And like most libertarians, I'm too lazy and into my own life to bother running for politics or "doing anything about it." If I'd partake in a libertarian meeting it would be to find like-minded fellows and enjoy interesting and engaging conversation.
But while I believe there is a silent majority of libertarians who are basically socially liberal conservatives, there's a loud, vocal minority within the libertarian party. And they're getting annoying.
Unlike the real libertarians, this vocal minority is more of the crusaderist variety. More focused on "protesting" and being part of some underdog crusade against "the man." This results in them voicing protests that are no different than what comes from leftists and socialists.
Hyperbole over police brutality.
All war is evil.
Soldiers are murderers.
It's all about oil.
The Illuminati.
The legalization of pot
"It's the corporations MAAAAAN!!!!"
They even have a god damned Wikipedia entry for "libertarian socialism" which is the epitome of contradiction.
In short, they really aren't libertarians as much as they are college kids who maybe read a pamphlet and now deem themselves "libertarians" since it's "cool" and "edgy." You might as well lump them in with the token high school "anarchist" or "marxist," both parodies of themselves as they Venn diagram with "emo" and "wears mascara."
Now if it were just faux intellectual kids choosing to be different instead of displaying genuine intellect, I'd be fine with that. Pat them on the head. "Yeah, man, 'socialist libertarianism.' What evs" as the youth like to say. But they can't just "be" libertarians. No, their egos get in the way.
No, they go the pastoral route and become the self-declared "majority whip" of the libertarian party, proselytizing, lecturing, and berating the majority of libertarians for their sins of (GASP!)
being OK with legitimate war
liking cops
having beers with soldiers
not believing in conspiracy theories
pro-corporation/business
and thinking pot is stupid
And so I think it's about time to slap them down.
I'm henceforth calling these type of crusaderist libertarians the "Children's Wing of the Libertarian Party." They like to make noise, view themselves in a self-aggrandizing and holy way, they're typically younger and inexperienced, and like children, should be seen and not heard. Perhaps if I ever do attend a meeting and join, I could make a motion for them to have their own little "Kiddies Table" at libertarian conventions where we can give them mascara and nylon and trench coats as well as copies of Das Kapital and a couple bags of pot. And when they get real nice and high, and think they have the solutions to the world's problems (not to mention the political platform of the libertarian party) we'll give them crayons and some paper and maybe they can spell it out, signing it at the bottom with their name and age.
Then I'll take it home, put it up on my fridge and my girlfriend will ask,
"What's that dear?"
And I'll say,
"Nothing dear. Literally nothing."
But while I believe there is a silent majority of libertarians who are basically socially liberal conservatives, there's a loud, vocal minority within the libertarian party. And they're getting annoying.
Unlike the real libertarians, this vocal minority is more of the crusaderist variety. More focused on "protesting" and being part of some underdog crusade against "the man." This results in them voicing protests that are no different than what comes from leftists and socialists.
Hyperbole over police brutality.
All war is evil.
Soldiers are murderers.
It's all about oil.
The Illuminati.
The legalization of pot
"It's the corporations MAAAAAN!!!!"
They even have a god damned Wikipedia entry for "libertarian socialism" which is the epitome of contradiction.
In short, they really aren't libertarians as much as they are college kids who maybe read a pamphlet and now deem themselves "libertarians" since it's "cool" and "edgy." You might as well lump them in with the token high school "anarchist" or "marxist," both parodies of themselves as they Venn diagram with "emo" and "wears mascara."
Now if it were just faux intellectual kids choosing to be different instead of displaying genuine intellect, I'd be fine with that. Pat them on the head. "Yeah, man, 'socialist libertarianism.' What evs" as the youth like to say. But they can't just "be" libertarians. No, their egos get in the way.
No, they go the pastoral route and become the self-declared "majority whip" of the libertarian party, proselytizing, lecturing, and berating the majority of libertarians for their sins of (GASP!)
being OK with legitimate war
liking cops
having beers with soldiers
not believing in conspiracy theories
pro-corporation/business
and thinking pot is stupid
And so I think it's about time to slap them down.
I'm henceforth calling these type of crusaderist libertarians the "Children's Wing of the Libertarian Party." They like to make noise, view themselves in a self-aggrandizing and holy way, they're typically younger and inexperienced, and like children, should be seen and not heard. Perhaps if I ever do attend a meeting and join, I could make a motion for them to have their own little "Kiddies Table" at libertarian conventions where we can give them mascara and nylon and trench coats as well as copies of Das Kapital and a couple bags of pot. And when they get real nice and high, and think they have the solutions to the world's problems (not to mention the political platform of the libertarian party) we'll give them crayons and some paper and maybe they can spell it out, signing it at the bottom with their name and age.
Then I'll take it home, put it up on my fridge and my girlfriend will ask,
"What's that dear?"
And I'll say,
"Nothing dear. Literally nothing."
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
How QE Money Ends Up in the Stock Market
Sometimes I like to connect the dots for my readers or for those of you who "know" something is happening, but don't know precisely how. So today we'll be looking at how QE money ends up in the stock market, thereby increasing PE ratios and making nothing worth buying!
So the first step is where the federal reserve is faced with the fact that Keynesian stimulus is failing, specifically monetary policy only affects inflation and prices and not real economic growth. Egos and heads explode at the fed because they're "economic geniuses" so they can't be wrong! So they lie to themselves and say they just "didn't do enough of it" and go onto fire up the printing presses.
But what to do with the money? They don't want to cause "inflation" but they still want to "boost the economy." So what they do is buy US treasury bonds, sometimes directly from the US treasury, but other times from banks and other financial institutions that are looking to get rid of that paper. But it's not just US treasuries they sell to thesucker fed. They unload their crappy junk mortgage backed securities to the fed, as well as their overprice stocks.
The proceeds of these purchases go into the coffers of the commercial bank and other financial institutions that sold thoseworthless pieces of paper securities to the fed. And what do they do with these hundreds of billions of dollars?
Why they invest it in the stock market!
And yes, it really is that simple junior, deputy, aspiring, official and otherwise economists!
Of course the increase in stock prices is not considered "real inflation" because...well...fed economists said so. So you go right ahead and max out your 401k contribution buying overpriced stocks with a PE of 27 and a dividend yield of 2%! It's patriotic!
So the first step is where the federal reserve is faced with the fact that Keynesian stimulus is failing, specifically monetary policy only affects inflation and prices and not real economic growth. Egos and heads explode at the fed because they're "economic geniuses" so they can't be wrong! So they lie to themselves and say they just "didn't do enough of it" and go onto fire up the printing presses.
But what to do with the money? They don't want to cause "inflation" but they still want to "boost the economy." So what they do is buy US treasury bonds, sometimes directly from the US treasury, but other times from banks and other financial institutions that are looking to get rid of that paper. But it's not just US treasuries they sell to the
The proceeds of these purchases go into the coffers of the commercial bank and other financial institutions that sold those
Why they invest it in the stock market!
And yes, it really is that simple junior, deputy, aspiring, official and otherwise economists!
Of course the increase in stock prices is not considered "real inflation" because...well...fed economists said so. So you go right ahead and max out your 401k contribution buying overpriced stocks with a PE of 27 and a dividend yield of 2%! It's patriotic!
New Blogroll Addition - Freedom Outpost
You will visit here. You will obey. You will conform. Compliance is mandatory.
There Is Nothing to Say About Ferguson
My time is finite and precious. Therefore I don't waste it.
I've had several inquiries about my opinion about Ferguson and it basically boils down to the Alcoholics Prayer where "grant me the wisdom to know what I can and cannot change." And Ferguson cannot be changed.
A thug was killed by a cop.
That thug happened to be black and the cop white.
The black community in Ferguson, programmed to hate and view everything in terms of race did not see it as one less criminal in their neighborhood, but an act of racism. They viewed last night's verdict as additional proof to their oppression and went to the streets to protest, destroying their own neighborhood, looting things that weren't theirs, ensuring no serious employer or business ever sets up shop there again, further condemning themselves to a life of secondary citizenry.
My political analysis of this is
YAAAAAWWWWWNNNNN.
When something new or interesting happens, let me know. Ferguson was entirely predictable, but more importantly, not solvable. Ergo, I don't care how many thousands of hours of political coverage and analysis ensues, not one minute of it will be anything new or productive. You might as well be watching Maury Povich or Jerry Springer. Matter of fact, my little piece here is about the only thing you really need to read about Ferguson.
So I recommend you view Ferguson like I do - your life is too short and too valuable to waste a second on it. Do something else instead like watching a good documentary, spending time with your family, learning a new skill or teaching yourself how to enjoy the decline.
I've had several inquiries about my opinion about Ferguson and it basically boils down to the Alcoholics Prayer where "grant me the wisdom to know what I can and cannot change." And Ferguson cannot be changed.
A thug was killed by a cop.
That thug happened to be black and the cop white.
The black community in Ferguson, programmed to hate and view everything in terms of race did not see it as one less criminal in their neighborhood, but an act of racism. They viewed last night's verdict as additional proof to their oppression and went to the streets to protest, destroying their own neighborhood, looting things that weren't theirs, ensuring no serious employer or business ever sets up shop there again, further condemning themselves to a life of secondary citizenry.
My political analysis of this is
YAAAAAWWWWWNNNNN.
When something new or interesting happens, let me know. Ferguson was entirely predictable, but more importantly, not solvable. Ergo, I don't care how many thousands of hours of political coverage and analysis ensues, not one minute of it will be anything new or productive. You might as well be watching Maury Povich or Jerry Springer. Matter of fact, my little piece here is about the only thing you really need to read about Ferguson.
So I recommend you view Ferguson like I do - your life is too short and too valuable to waste a second on it. Do something else instead like watching a good documentary, spending time with your family, learning a new skill or teaching yourself how to enjoy the decline.
Monday, November 24, 2014
Spot the Beta
Long-exasperated-SIGGGGHHHHHHHH!
Boys, and by "boys," I mean liberal men,
Acting like you're a liberal and placating women's leftists tendencies does not get you laid, just as submitting this law will not get you laid.
Boys, and by "boys," I mean liberal men,
Acting like you're a liberal and placating women's leftists tendencies does not get you laid, just as submitting this law will not get you laid.
Australia White Ribbon Campaign-Absuing Abused Women
Disgusting. Just disgusting.
Not only does the Australian White Ribbon campaign make absolutely NO effort to ameliorate abuse against women, they simply use domestic violence as a way to merely profit for themselves. I don't even see a god damned expense for "cause expense" or "charity." There's like NO MONEY making it into the hands of abused women. It's damn well near 100% expenses just to keep the non-profit going to pay their salaries.
You may hate "evil corporations."
You may hate "big oil."
But for the love of god is there anything more sick than using victims to profit off of it ALL WHILE CLAIMING TO BE HELPING THESE VICTIMS?
You non-profit people are scum.
Not only does the Australian White Ribbon campaign make absolutely NO effort to ameliorate abuse against women, they simply use domestic violence as a way to merely profit for themselves. I don't even see a god damned expense for "cause expense" or "charity." There's like NO MONEY making it into the hands of abused women. It's damn well near 100% expenses just to keep the non-profit going to pay their salaries.
You may hate "evil corporations."
You may hate "big oil."
But for the love of god is there anything more sick than using victims to profit off of it ALL WHILE CLAIMING TO BE HELPING THESE VICTIMS?
You non-profit people are scum.
What's Really Driving the Basic Guaranteed Income
I happily discovered a new treasure trove of podcasts. They focus primarily on the history of the UK, but also delve into world history, wars, etc., allowing me to further educate myself in an arena I am woefully ignorant in. But something interesting happened while listening to a podcast.
During one of the interviews you could clearly hear the interviewer and interviewee. But in the background you could hear a woman singing. Turns out the interview was being recorded at a cathedral of some sort and as part of the ambiance they had a woman singing. But then my rapid economic mind started thinking, thought through, and then concluded a thought in less than a second:
"Is that really a woman singing?
In the olden days I'm sure it was, but with technology it's likely just a recording being played on a stereo system.
So that woman only had to record he singing once.
I wonder what she does with all of her free time now.
God do I hate San Fransisco taxi cab drivers."
The last bit of logic may not make sense, but it does if you allow for a little bit of economic hand holding. For the woman singing in the church (either past or present), the taxi cab drivers in San Francisco and the call for a "Basic Guaranteed Income" are all highly related and provide for us a great lesson and insight into the economics and political motivation of the basic guaranteed income.
The argument for a "basic guaranteed income" (BGI) is that as technology and science progresses, more and more human jobs will become obsoleted and replaced by automation and robotics. This presents the paradox that goods and services are still being produced, but without jobs people have no income to buy said goods and services. Therefore, as robots replace humans (leaving them no income) we should guarantee all humans with a "basic income" allowing them to afford the basic necessities in life.
However, for this argument to have integrity there must be absolutely NO JOBS available for the displaced human labor. I've argued before that this simply isn't true as no matter how much technology advances there will be two forms of employment:
1. The "vanity services" where humans serve other humans (waiters, masseuses, prostitutes, authors, entertainers, servants, etc.) and
2. The robotic support industry (the STEM professionals who keep this progressively roboticized economy going).
However, my argument aside, history provides enough of an argument to debunk the pro-BGI claims. No matter how much technology advances, there are always completely new industries, replete with jobs that replaces the old ones.
Horse and buggy manufacturers were simply replaced with auto-manufacturers.
Phone manufacturers were replaced by smart phone producers.
And employees at the vinyl shop were merely replaced with IT employees allowing for MP3 recording.
In other words, this "creative destruction" didn't replace humans as much as it forced them to be innovative and creative in other endeavors as it replaced and obsoleted previous technologies.
But that's the key thing - forced humans to be innovative and creative. And a lot of humans plain don't like that.
Some humans, when facing obsolescence simply do the adult thing and accept this reality. They move on, learn a new skill or trade, start over again, reinventing themselves earning living. Some humans go so far as to become entrepreneurs, capitalizing on ideas and revolutions in the economy, providing employment and higher standards of living for others. But then there are some who are so delusional, so arrogant, so self-centered, they actually believe that the real world should not advance without their authorization. And if the world "dares" to progress to the point it obsoletes their careers, then the world indeed "owes them a living."
These people constitute a parasitic class that can only be described as lazy and entitled. The union worker who demands his pension despite the company going bankrupt. The person who gets laid off and decides to go on the permanent government dole. Or the pouty school administrator that gets fired by a gracious and generous early retirement severance. These people are economically worthless individuals, providing nothing of net economic value to society at all.
But while these people may be economically worthless, at least these people have the good graces to get the hell out of the way and let society advance. They just want their check and they're happy (or at least as happy as these miserable humans can be). Sadly, there's an even more despicable group of people that make these veritable economic parasites look noble as they are so arrogant, so self-centered, and so egomanical they not only demand recompense, but they demand the rest of the world stop and not advance without them.
And that's where the San Francisco taxi cab drivers come in.
Technologies like Lyft and Uber have obsoleted taxi cabs. They are now officially an inferior service. Like the record companies, the book publishers, and the horse and buggy industry they should accept this fact and either adapt by becoming Uber/Lyft providers themselves or find a new industry to work in.
However, taxi cab drivers are not only entitled, they're evil. And I'm not saying that as a pejorative, but as a descriptive. San Francisco taxi cab drivers are evil because instead of letting society advance, letting the people of San Francisco enjoy higher standards of living (which is what the whole point and purposes of technology and economic advancement is), they threw a temper tantrum and held the city hostage by causing traffic jams with their cars. In no uncertain words, these few people view themselves MORE IMPORTANT than the rest of society and have no problems holding back, nay punishing these people for daring to aspire for a better life.
Of course taxi cab drivers are not the only example of this. Chicago's infamous toll roads with their manually stationed tolls were so heavily unionized that the metro population of Chicago was held hostage WAAAAY past the point in time traffic scanning technology made such tolls obsolete. The public schools and higher education are another example of unneeded, worthless, obsoleted humans that have no moral qualms holding children hostage in ransom for "more money for schools." And I never tire of the dinosaur publishing houses stammer their little feet as they (futilely) try to stop self-publishers.
Regardless, the point is that human nature is pathetic. And the proponents of the BGI know this and are banking on it. For if a soon-to-be-obsoleted-human is given the choice:
a. Start anew, learn new skills and participate in the new and revolutionized economy
b. Collect a check
c. Not only collect a check, but demand society never be allowed to advance so I can save my ego by keeping my unneeded job
most humans are so lazy, and some so egotistical, they'll choose either b or c.
And that is what truly is behind the drive for the BGI.
The BGI is not something that is "noble" or "compassionate." It is not something that is "caring" or "kind." It is a blatant attempt by socialists and leftsits in academia and government to buy votes by placating the laziness, ego, and self-centeredness of a progressively worthless human population. They are merely presenting the false premise that "creative destruction" does not exist (ergo, there will be "no jobs"), while knowing full well the average American schlep is to proud, too ego-filled to work the menial service jobs that will exist, and too lazy to train for the STEM jobs that would also exist.
But where the real evil comes in is where I predict there will be a "third category" of jobs - "ego employment." Jobs that are not only unnecessary, but hold society back by either denying society the ability to progress, or at minimum taxing them to create make-work jobs, ALL of which are simply to save the ego of a voting constituent.
It does indeed make the parasite who merely collects a government check look noble.
Post post - a reader recommended this. "Player Piano" a book where in the near future everything is mechanized and there is a struggle between the scientific and management classes that keep the machines running and the unskilled people who have no jobs.
Post post post - looks like there's going to be some automation in the Bakken oil field with drones and roboticized trucks following a lead truck. How much you want to bet the teamsters will get in the way of you getting cheaper gas?
During one of the interviews you could clearly hear the interviewer and interviewee. But in the background you could hear a woman singing. Turns out the interview was being recorded at a cathedral of some sort and as part of the ambiance they had a woman singing. But then my rapid economic mind started thinking, thought through, and then concluded a thought in less than a second:
"Is that really a woman singing?
In the olden days I'm sure it was, but with technology it's likely just a recording being played on a stereo system.
So that woman only had to record he singing once.
I wonder what she does with all of her free time now.
God do I hate San Fransisco taxi cab drivers."
The last bit of logic may not make sense, but it does if you allow for a little bit of economic hand holding. For the woman singing in the church (either past or present), the taxi cab drivers in San Francisco and the call for a "Basic Guaranteed Income" are all highly related and provide for us a great lesson and insight into the economics and political motivation of the basic guaranteed income.
The argument for a "basic guaranteed income" (BGI) is that as technology and science progresses, more and more human jobs will become obsoleted and replaced by automation and robotics. This presents the paradox that goods and services are still being produced, but without jobs people have no income to buy said goods and services. Therefore, as robots replace humans (leaving them no income) we should guarantee all humans with a "basic income" allowing them to afford the basic necessities in life.
However, for this argument to have integrity there must be absolutely NO JOBS available for the displaced human labor. I've argued before that this simply isn't true as no matter how much technology advances there will be two forms of employment:
1. The "vanity services" where humans serve other humans (waiters, masseuses, prostitutes, authors, entertainers, servants, etc.) and
2. The robotic support industry (the STEM professionals who keep this progressively roboticized economy going).
However, my argument aside, history provides enough of an argument to debunk the pro-BGI claims. No matter how much technology advances, there are always completely new industries, replete with jobs that replaces the old ones.
Horse and buggy manufacturers were simply replaced with auto-manufacturers.
Phone manufacturers were replaced by smart phone producers.
And employees at the vinyl shop were merely replaced with IT employees allowing for MP3 recording.
In other words, this "creative destruction" didn't replace humans as much as it forced them to be innovative and creative in other endeavors as it replaced and obsoleted previous technologies.
But that's the key thing - forced humans to be innovative and creative. And a lot of humans plain don't like that.
Some humans, when facing obsolescence simply do the adult thing and accept this reality. They move on, learn a new skill or trade, start over again, reinventing themselves earning living. Some humans go so far as to become entrepreneurs, capitalizing on ideas and revolutions in the economy, providing employment and higher standards of living for others. But then there are some who are so delusional, so arrogant, so self-centered, they actually believe that the real world should not advance without their authorization. And if the world "dares" to progress to the point it obsoletes their careers, then the world indeed "owes them a living."
These people constitute a parasitic class that can only be described as lazy and entitled. The union worker who demands his pension despite the company going bankrupt. The person who gets laid off and decides to go on the permanent government dole. Or the pouty school administrator that gets fired by a gracious and generous early retirement severance. These people are economically worthless individuals, providing nothing of net economic value to society at all.
But while these people may be economically worthless, at least these people have the good graces to get the hell out of the way and let society advance. They just want their check and they're happy (or at least as happy as these miserable humans can be). Sadly, there's an even more despicable group of people that make these veritable economic parasites look noble as they are so arrogant, so self-centered, and so egomanical they not only demand recompense, but they demand the rest of the world stop and not advance without them.
And that's where the San Francisco taxi cab drivers come in.
Technologies like Lyft and Uber have obsoleted taxi cabs. They are now officially an inferior service. Like the record companies, the book publishers, and the horse and buggy industry they should accept this fact and either adapt by becoming Uber/Lyft providers themselves or find a new industry to work in.
However, taxi cab drivers are not only entitled, they're evil. And I'm not saying that as a pejorative, but as a descriptive. San Francisco taxi cab drivers are evil because instead of letting society advance, letting the people of San Francisco enjoy higher standards of living (which is what the whole point and purposes of technology and economic advancement is), they threw a temper tantrum and held the city hostage by causing traffic jams with their cars. In no uncertain words, these few people view themselves MORE IMPORTANT than the rest of society and have no problems holding back, nay punishing these people for daring to aspire for a better life.
Of course taxi cab drivers are not the only example of this. Chicago's infamous toll roads with their manually stationed tolls were so heavily unionized that the metro population of Chicago was held hostage WAAAAY past the point in time traffic scanning technology made such tolls obsolete. The public schools and higher education are another example of unneeded, worthless, obsoleted humans that have no moral qualms holding children hostage in ransom for "more money for schools." And I never tire of the dinosaur publishing houses stammer their little feet as they (futilely) try to stop self-publishers.
Regardless, the point is that human nature is pathetic. And the proponents of the BGI know this and are banking on it. For if a soon-to-be-obsoleted-human is given the choice:
a. Start anew, learn new skills and participate in the new and revolutionized economy
b. Collect a check
c. Not only collect a check, but demand society never be allowed to advance so I can save my ego by keeping my unneeded job
most humans are so lazy, and some so egotistical, they'll choose either b or c.
And that is what truly is behind the drive for the BGI.
The BGI is not something that is "noble" or "compassionate." It is not something that is "caring" or "kind." It is a blatant attempt by socialists and leftsits in academia and government to buy votes by placating the laziness, ego, and self-centeredness of a progressively worthless human population. They are merely presenting the false premise that "creative destruction" does not exist (ergo, there will be "no jobs"), while knowing full well the average American schlep is to proud, too ego-filled to work the menial service jobs that will exist, and too lazy to train for the STEM jobs that would also exist.
But where the real evil comes in is where I predict there will be a "third category" of jobs - "ego employment." Jobs that are not only unnecessary, but hold society back by either denying society the ability to progress, or at minimum taxing them to create make-work jobs, ALL of which are simply to save the ego of a voting constituent.
It does indeed make the parasite who merely collects a government check look noble.
Post post - a reader recommended this. "Player Piano" a book where in the near future everything is mechanized and there is a struggle between the scientific and management classes that keep the machines running and the unskilled people who have no jobs.
Post post post - looks like there's going to be some automation in the Bakken oil field with drones and roboticized trucks following a lead truck. How much you want to bet the teamsters will get in the way of you getting cheaper gas?
Sunday, November 23, 2014
Dear Muslims, Thank You for Invading Sweden
They obviously have become a society with REALLY nothing better to do.
History Podcast Treasure Trove Discovered
And now I have what seems to be at least week's worth of brand new listening material!
New Sponsor - Prevail
Saturday, November 22, 2014
American Education for Foreigners, Not Americans
Though I can't blame them. American students study stupid shit today anyways.
Friday, November 21, 2014
Explaining the Corporate Tax Debate
As you know I like to take complex subjects and boil them down to their most basic elements.
Remember, if you're looking to hire an artist, consider our resident artist Jorge Gonzalez!
Remember, if you're looking to hire an artist, consider our resident artist Jorge Gonzalez!
Another Reason Not to Breed
Apparently the state is deeming it necessary to FORCE parents to pay for their childrens' college tuition.
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Here's How You Stop Rape, Ladies
I didn’t wait 15 years, or 25, or 45. I got in my car and drove
immediately over to the police station and told them what happened. I
had a rape kit done, photos taken, and gave my statement. He was
arrested, and eventually jailed. He is still in jail, thank goodness.
He wasn’t hard to find. Everyone knew him. I guess he didn’t think
that I would go to the police, and do so as quickly as I did, because
when they arrested him he still had remnants of my DNA on him.
I'll just say it again for the cheap seats because I know the current hubbub about rape is not about "rape" as much as it is a power-grab from miserable feminists to fund their "women's shelter" programs on various campuses.
GO
TO
THE
COPS
ASAP.
Do not pass Go
Do not collection $200
You need to get your ass to the cops ASAP.
20 years ago when I worked at the campus cop program during college they drilled that into our heads. And I got new for you,
The police department cares a lot more about you women than the "Women's Studies" Department.
I'll just say it again for the cheap seats because I know the current hubbub about rape is not about "rape" as much as it is a power-grab from miserable feminists to fund their "women's shelter" programs on various campuses.
GO
TO
THE
COPS
ASAP.
Do not pass Go
Do not collection $200
You need to get your ass to the cops ASAP.
20 years ago when I worked at the campus cop program during college they drilled that into our heads. And I got new for you,
The police department cares a lot more about you women than the "Women's Studies" Department.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



