Anyway, as my suspicions proved correct (which they normally do), "Flo" from the Progressive commercials is indeed hot and no less than 81% of the men found her attractive. And when I say "found her attractive" I am understating what they said. Comments were more along the lines of "oh my god, something or other about breaking her name tag."
Once again my charting skills, economic skills and being able to identify hot babe skills have advanced society by proving Flo is indeed a hottie. Now go buy my book!!!!
12 comments:
I'll go with the Flo.
I gotta vote not hot. But to me this reprises the old - "Is Malcolm in the Middle's" Mom hot? Again I said no, but I bet the same people who think Flo is hot think Malcom's mom is hot.
Hey Bill,
As the statistics point out, the "correct" answer is;
Flo is hot.
I can do a power point presentation for CFACT on that issue if you want ;)
Flo is advertising for an insurance company that gives a ridiculous amount of money to the Democratic party.
Flo is still not hot, and she's working for the pinkos, too.
I must say as a fun loving, swing dancing, capitalist Flo is NOT HOT. If one were to think that she is I am for redefining HOT, Socializing it and redistributing more hotness to those in need; Flo would be the first to get hers in the mail.
If that doesn't work we will just have to send those who descent to re-education camp, camp de Play Boy Mansion ;)
Statistics are meaningless. A million people dead is a statistic, to abuse a quote. Personal opinions are what matter.
I agree with Bill.
Wow, this has become a hotly debated issue (nice pun, he?)
Hotness, just like prices, is determined by market forces. And the market tells us that Flo is in high demand, therefore she must be hot! That's the outcome of a free market. A Ferrari costs a freakin' $200k, so it's hot, whether you like it or not.
Captain, we gotta start a hotness stock market where we trade shares of Flo's to find out her real "price" (uh, you know what I mean).
Flo is very, very attractive, in a feminine, friendly, funny sort of way.
Anybody guy who prefers instead the striking, austere, hard as nails, 'tough chick' look that seems to be so popular these days, should have their head examined.
Which one would you really rather wake up next to: 'feminine, friendly & funny' or 'strikingly tough looking with no make up' ?
Flo's look harkens back to the golden era of va-va-voom bombshells, back "when men were men and women stayed out of the way when the shooting started."
The current "hot" Flo market is a speculative bubble picking up speed. Quantity demanded for Flo is just a function of her current low cost. (which, if you're paying attention, is what Flo is always talking about. That and her name tag)
What's all this mean? Flo is hinting that she's a woman of negotiable affection and virtue, willing to do whatever is required to get a new, tricked out nametag.
So have Flo if you want, you'll probably end up catching something horrible. Like Progressive insurance.
I know I'm female so .. yeah, my vote doesn't count.
But I just don't see it.. maybe guys are just a lot less picky than I give them credit for?
So, if this Flo person's attractiveness nee virtue is a product of the free market, as is being argued ("Flo is...a woman of negotiable affection and virtue..."), does this mean that really, all we're doing, in the words of Winston Churchill, is haggling over the price?
Isn't that supposedly what Amsterdam is for? Not that I condone such things, mind you, but we're arguing hypotheticals here.
"So, if this Flo person's attractiveness nee virtue is a product of the free market, as is being argued ("Flo is...a woman of negotiable affection and virtue..."), does this mean that really, all we're doing, in the words of Winston Churchill, is haggling over the price?"
Essentially. And in the morning many of us shall be sober, but she will still be wearing way too much makeup.
Post a Comment