Continuing on from my previous observation that the MSM is nothing more than a leftist veil of aging and dying baby boomers, enter Eduardo Porter.
This guy is at least 20 years my senior and he works for the New York Times.
The NEW YORK fucking TIMES!
You know, that has-been baby boomer rag that claimed in the 70's it was "all the news fit to print?"
Anyway, he came out with this article about how welfare does not corrupt people and is a good thing.
Now, again, if you believe how you've been conditioned to believe that because he works for "THE" New York Times he is some how an authority figure. Well, just take a looksy at his twitter followers:
Look, guys, again, I'm a freaking nobody. I alone with NO MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR NEW YORK ASS KISSING SUPPORT NETWORK still have 50% the followers "Eduardo" does.
So why would you listen to him?
Which behooves, why would you listen to the New York Times?
I will say it again simply because it advances the focus of the American public to realize that the MSM and the likes of "Eduardo" are NOT the "authorities" they claim they are:
These people are HAVE BEENS! And sadly they were "NEVER WERE'S." They are an obsolete class of political activists that never had any talent and are simply trying to fight against the internet and its democratizing effects on the American public. This guy is a NOBODY! He's just an aged baby boomer journalist who never worked a real job in his life! The only reason you heard about him is because the NYT slapped their stick on him and (sadly) I'm bringing attention to the fact this man even exists.
So seriously, I mean this. We are winning. The dipshits at the bankrupt-only-to-be-bailed-out-by-Carlos-Slim-New York times have to resort to hiring nobodies like Eduardo Porter to write masturbatory pieces for their leftist 50+ readership. They aren't real "journalists." They're wanna-be's. They're hacks. They're propaganda pieces.
Just realize that the next time some idiot out there cites the "New York Times" as a "source."