Rantings and tirades of a frustrated economist.
So will he get the kids or will the judge still take the mother at her word (the one taken when the father was ordered out of his own house) and have the state abduct the children?I am pretty sure I know the answer to this question. It's "for the children" afterall.
I am shocked that the authorities gave enough of a shit to actually investigate this. Normal procedure is to assume the husband Is guilty. A three times divorced buddy of mine said the best money he ever spent was a vasectomy. No kids for revenue extraction or to be held hostage by Mom and the state.
OT - Here's one for you Cap:http://www.theonion.com/articles/im-just-a-free-spirit-who-is-entirely-financially,33905/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=SocialMarketing&utm_campaign=LinkPreview:NA:InFocusA new-age guy?
You realise that, in Australia, even though the wife would be charged for getting the pornography, the husband would still be assumed guilty and the wife could NEVER face charges for levelling false accusations against the husband.When asked why it's like that a female colleague of mine said "a woman's can't be held accountable because if she's desperate enough to make up a story like that, he must have done SOMETHING to deserve it".I wonder if she felt the same way if false accusations were flying at a male relative of hers...
Somehow it doesn't surprise me in the slightest. I must be getting jaded, used to all the BS goings-on by these creepy-minded women.
1: Never stick your dick in crazy.2: Bitches be crazy.Therefore....
You don't have to even stick your dick in crazy:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKeTt0wFkD8This 15 year old only got her phone number, yet spent over a year in lock-up because she accused him of rape.His family lost their house defending him.FYI - houses in the city they live AVERAGE over $500k. Think about that!
Post a Comment