When you bend over backwards and reach so far as to make cryptocurrency "sexist"
AND
you get published in a major government news outlet because you are just so oppressed
you'll forgive me if me and the rest of the world just laugh at feminism and feminists and accurately ID you for the pathetic, sad whiny entitled children you are.
8 comments:
If there is anything these femnuts are unhappy with, it's automatically the mens fault. I just want to hit the mute button and ignore them. But I can't, because they worm their way into government. Then they make ridiculous laws. Case in point Iceland's equal pay law.
"it's now illegal to pay a women less than they would a man for the same job." Same job, not same work. So all you need is the title, and you get the pay. I predict this will result in a race to bottom in productivity. Then more legislation will be needed to force those deemed more productive to produce. From each according to his ability, to each according to her need.
It will be like the 20th century motor company in Atlas Shrugged.
God damn nightmare.
The more high-tech something is, the more above the comprehension of women it is.
Women are obsolete. They didn't even notice cryptocurrency until some men were making money from it. Suddenly, they feel entitled to that money.
That's funny. I don't recall ditch digging, coal mining, road construction, and sewage maintenance sexist and it is done by nearly and exclusively by men.
Why is it always "role models are needed"? - can't women work stuff out for themselves, western civilization was built by men going out into the unknown and risking it all, that's where real success comes from. Women by nature are risk adverse, hence their pushing for government to coddle them throughout their lives in every manner and by every means.
It's like they need a freaking safe space within bitcoin....
Seriously? That link is to the CBC. Its completely infested with lefty sjw's and feminists. Oh poets too. Its the most biased source of news in Canada. Subsidized by the Canadian taxpayer for over $1 billion a year. Listen to it some time. The amount of time they devote to lefty crap no sane person cares about is impressive.
That was disappointing...Usually these types of links are quite entertaining, but this time it was just "meh..."
Nowhere in the article does it say that cryptocurrencies are sexist. Yes, they used the therm "boy club" which can have a negative conotation, but the bulk of the article was clear about the fact that the gender disparity in this case comes from risk aversion. They even end on that note and state that women will enter the market if turns out to not be a bubble.
Why is it always "role models are needed"? - can't women work stuff out for themselves
No. Manifestly and multiply, no. Without a role model - even a completely fictional one - there is no advancement possible. We get barraged with this deranged notion regularly, and from those who apparently should know best, so I'm going with: No. They absolutely, abjectly, and with only the rare exception to prove the rule, cannot.
Feel free to prove me wrong, girls.
🤔
Post a Comment