Monday, September 05, 2016

The Meaning of Life: Religion, Hedonism, Family, and Legacy

A client's request ended up being a bit more profound and, after thought and contemplation, resulted in a very organized and structured approach as to determining what is the meaning of life:


Un Americano said...

Google's motto is, "Do no evil."

leeholsen said...


I hadn't seen the captain's take on the meaning of life, yet !

Too hard to say if it'll be heavy, thought provoking, sarcastic, blunt or a combination of all of these.

I have to know, but I do believe I'm going to bookmark it and save it for Saturday and if it is just too much to handle, I can immediately head out and drown things with some good German beer and occupy my mind elsewhere with some attractive blonde women.

JK Brown said...

In regards to Labor Day, consider this statement from a century ago:

"For instance, it is a primary principle that an English free man of full age, under no disability, may control his person and his personal activities. He can work six, or four, or eight, or ten, or twelve, or twenty-four, or no hours a day if he choose, and any attempt to control him is impossible under the simplest principle of Anglo-Saxon liberty.

"Yet there is possibly a majority of the members of the labor unions who would wish to control him in this particular today; and will take for an example that under the police power the state has been permitted to control him in matters affecting the public health or safety, as, for instance, in the running of railway trains, or, in Utah, in labor in the mines. But freedom of contract in this connection results generally from personal liberty itself; although it results also from the right to property; that is to say, a man's wages (or his trade, for matter of that) is his property, and the right of property is of no practical use if you cannot have the right to make contracts concerning it.

"The only matter more important doubtless in the laborer's eye than the length of time he shall work is the amount of wages he shall receive. Now we may say at the start that in the English-speaking world there has been practically no attempt to regulate the amount of wages. We found such legislation in medieval England, and we also found that it was abandoned with general consent. But of late years in these socialistic days (using again socialistic in its proper sense of that which controls personal liberty for the interest of the community or state) it is surprisingly showing its head once more."

--Popular Law-making: A Study of the Origin, History, and Present Tendencies of Law-making by Statute, Frederic Jesup Stimson (1910)