The Handicap of a High IQ (Guest Writer Matt Baldoni)

The Great Matt Baldoni was kind enough to guest write as I head across the finish line on "The Curse of the High IQ."  Mr. Baldoni is a genius, and I don't mean that in a musical sense. I mean that in a literal sense, and conveys his experiences and thoughts growing up with a high IQ, experiences that will hopefully prove useful for your own lives.

The Handicap of a High IQ by Matt Baldoni

I didn't know my IQ was high until I paid to get it tested three different ways as an adult in my 30s.  I had actually underestimated what the numbers would be by a long shot.  It doesn't change much in my life now that I know, but it's a nice confidence booster.  I sure as hell don't advertise it that much, but it's sorta like finding out you have a huge penis.  You can't really tell anybody about it during a business meeting, but it sure helps you feel like a winner, which helps you out in the rest of life. I carefully chose three different standardized tests (The Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale, The Cognitive Assessment System, and Stanford-Binet), took them separately, and waited for results.  Depending on who you ask, my numbers fell between 127 and 140.  With a mean 100 and standard deviation 15, that puts me in the top few percent. Now, many say that these tests mean NOTHING, and while they don't mean everything, they mean something.  Especially for children. Children who measure high on the intelligence quotient scale tend to favor the arts.  That turned out to be true for me. High IQ kids also tend to shy away from sports and be more socially active within their comfortable circles.  They also tend to develop cognitive ability faster, which makes them good at things like math.  These kids also tend to develop self discipline and responsibility at an early age.  All this turned out to be true for me.  However, it soon became a handicap to have high intelligence in MANY different ways.  Here are a few of them, starting with the two things I did to myself the most:

Self-destruction

People with a High IQ are more likely to exhibit self-destructive behavior, including addictive behavior.  TRU DAT.  When I entered my teenage years as a student and budding professional musician, it wasn't long before drugs and alcohol became a daily ritual.  Those daily habits lasted for many years, and were destructive.  Science shows us that many drug addicts/alcoholics tend to have high IQ's, which they think allows so many of them to be “functioning addicts”.  Other people kill themselves with that shit, but we can function somehow, even while our physiological insides are getting eaten away.

Lying and Manipulation

People with a High IQ are more likely to lie and manipulate.  We're also more likely to be sociopathic. I'm no clinical sociopath, or else the two licensed therapists I've seen would have diagnosed me as such.  But I did speak with these two professionals about the fact that I have lied a lot.  Mostly to get what I wanted or needed.  Getting money, getting laid, manipulating a situation to my advantage, throwing someone else under the bus with a lie, lying to get revenge, I did them all.

People with a high IQ are more likely to have vengeful tendencies too, by the way.  From teenage years to the bulk of my 20s, lying to women was almost a requirement.  I sure did get laid a lot, though.

So...those are the two most self-destructive behaviors I put in to practice that science also says are more likely to be exhibited by subjects with my IQ numbers.  Now let's look at how it played out in some other situations:

Immediate Family

One look at my family will tell you that most of them are bumbling idiots. My dad's no doubt the smartest of his entire household, but my mother's a wingnut and a lot of the rest of em couldn't spell some of the words in this essay or do long division if you held a gun to their head.  They also reproduce like rabbits, which is a characteristic of lower IQ numbers. Oh yeah, forgot to mention that one, people with High IQ's are less likely to pass on their genes. Shocker. Being smart in my family meant that you were a “know-it-all” or a “smartass” or trying to prove something to everyone else.  They always had great animosity to people smarter than them. Now that I've had time to think on it, it handicapped me in a few different ways with the large group of Italian Americans who raised me. They're loving people and they cared for me a great deal, but I did feel like an outsider.  To this day, on the rare occasion I visit for a holiday glut-fest dinner, we don't have a whole lot to talk about or relate to. I should also mention my brother in all this.  He's a real-life exception to the rule.  He was a star athlete who was actually diagnosed as ADHD as a child. Usually great athletes don't exhibit High IQ numbers, but somehow, at age 20, upon graduating from the firefighters' academy in California, he not only scored in the top 5 for written testing, but also in the top 5 for physical agility. He continues to be one of the strongest and smartest firefighters in his world, and has excelled through the ranks with greater speed than anyone he came up with. He's set to be one of the youngest Fire Department Captains in the history of the state this year.  According to the science, my brother is an anomaly.

Education 

Hindsight is 20/20, and I look back on my K-17 education as a total joke.  The absolute worst in leftist brainwashing, from kindergarten through dropping out of grad music school.  Grad school was when I finally came to full realization what a bill of goods I had been sold, and I left hastily.  I'm embarrassed it took me that long, but again, good science shows us that some with High IQ numbers are more likely to believe bullshit when they're young.  I guess that's me too. Being a child of California public schools and the California State University system through the late 80s, 90s, and early 2000s was a recipe for disaster.  Although the economy in California was robust for most of that, the system was failing fast and getting more and more and MORE government subsidy all along the way the years I was there.  You had to be a blank slate with these teachers (90% of which were women, of course).  There were no exceptions allowed.  Some weird tests were given to me early on, something called the “gifted program”, and a few others.  But for me, getting singled out like that was a recipe to get bullied and get the shit beat out of you at the bus stop, so I turned them down.  It was my choice after all. By the time I got to a high-end private university for grad school, I saw that most of my colleagues were not intelligent at all, just simply rich.  They had the dough to be there, and they were buying a useless degree in jazz guitar. So I got out.  I still, to this day, feel so utterly embarrassed for buying into all of it and spending so much time on music education after public school, when I could have just been working.  Thankfully, I don't have any debt from it anymore.  I do not recommend it to any young musician with potential, especially ones that I see are very intelligent.

Religion

Okay, more good science, kids!  There is a negative correlation between involvement in organized religion and IQ numbers.  Dumb people go to church, basically.  Smart people don't.  I couldn't throw away Catholicism fast enough as a teenager, and what a bag-o-bricks THAT was to set down.  I've lived an entire adulthood free of that guilt, and it's been a major component to my success.  You can read more about why atheists in particular have High IQ's. It's no accident that large groups of people just hand over their money and their time to gigantic machine-like religions and churchianities.  The bell curve of intelligence makes no mistakes.  People of average or below intelligence need something to explain things to them, and who better than their imaginary friend Jesus and his dad?

Once you grow into young adulthood and can be responsible and make
some of your own choices, being surrounded by religion and having no choice in the matter can seriously handicap you.

Dating

Ah, this one's my favorite.  As far as the IQ #'s in men vs. women, we must remember that much of this science is government funded.  The numbers have to be often cooked in order to spew out the proper results so the scientists can continue to get their funding.  And you just CAN NOT say that men are smarter than women, that's a big no-no, even if it's true.  This is a topic of much debate for a long, long time. For centuries before the 1960s or so (when feminism was introduced), the science was pretty ubiquitous on men being ever so slightly more intelligent than women.  Things changed, and now we're supposed to be the same.  The testing was changed starting in 1974 to equalize the genders.  But good science (in the private sector), to this day, still shows us that although gender plays no role in intelligence from ages 0-14, after that the curve bends slightly towards men.  Particularly in the areas of math and science.  No matter how much they try and cook the books, there is always that one difference between men and women.  The general consensus is also that there is a mean difference of 3 IQ points to the advantage of males.  That ain't much, but it's something.

How can this handicap a smart guy's dating life?  Well, in many ways.  First, hotter girls are generally dumber.  Although easy to bang, you won't have much to talk about with them if you're dating them at any length or significance. Hot girls are dumber because there's no need for them to be smart.  Men don't correct a hot girl when she's wrong because they usually wants to fuck her.  Attractive girls can get things provided for them far easier for a far longer time.  While it's easier for a smarter guy to manipulate his way into a hot girl's life (using game and general cognitive advantage), she will then likely expect provisions and resources from him, simply because biology and evolution suggest that women are attracted to men with more resources (intelligence and otherwise) for purposes of breeding.  There is also a long-held direct correlation between intelligence and income.  We make more money than dumb guys do, regardless of field, so we're more likely to have women around because we have more money.  The handicap here is that we have a higher chance of getting manipulated out of our resources. After two decades of bachelored singledom and many, many relationships, I've found that the best bet for happiness is to find a 7-8 with lower intelligence than me.

These women are everywhere and can make a smart man very happy, even for a small amount of time.  Let's also remind ourselves that we are far less likely to breed, which correlates to being far less likely to marry, which can send women of ALL intelligence levels packing very quickly.  I've lost more good women because of my refusal to marry and procreate than for any other reason.  Oh well!

Keeping hours

This one turned up a lot of results in my research.  Higher intelligence people are more likely to operate best at night.  I found this to be true at a very young age, and it's to my advantage now because I live my life in show business.  We work when all the other worker bees are off, which is at night, on the weekends, and on holidays. This night-owl type stuff can also lead to depression, some science says.  People with high intelligence can often experience frustration with many common interactions on a given day.  Say for instance, everyone getting upset when you correct them during conversation.  We don't even think about that when we do it, but it makes people very angry.  Being called an “egomaniac” or a “braggart” when you're simply excited to share something you've learned.  And after all this brow-beating, people still expect you to be a top performer when you're smart.  This can frustrate us and make us feel shitty.

More....

A common association in many bullshit studies is that people with high IQ's are “more socially inept or awkward”.  It may be true.  But not if you associate with other smart people.  If I'm in a fucking Wal-Mart or passing through a crowd of women watching the Kardashians, no, I'm sorry, I don't want to talk to any of you and I will act like an asshole to get you out of my face.  If that makes me “socially inept”, fine. High IQ also commonly results in the individual requiring a higher amount of solitude and contemplation than the middle of the curve.  People will call you socially inept if you like to be by yourself.  They'll also call you depressed, lonely, and sad when in all reality you may be perfectly content. Being an “outsider” is very common for people with high intelligence, but thankfully, in this day and age, we are all connected through an insanely accessible network.  It's easier today to find other intelligent people than it ever has been in any time before.  It's easy to find those people like you, and spend time with them.  When smart people hang with smart people, it's not an echo chamber, it's a wonderful exchange of differentiating ideas and yet another learning experience that can contribute to our intelligence.  So go find each other.

Calling All Hot Nerdy Chicks

Attention All Female Lieutenants and Agents in the Field,

The ole Captain is coming around the final stretch to finish "Curse of the High IQ" and will move onto the marketing stage.  And to be blunt because i'm an asshole and I don't like wasting time, I want to market it with hot nerds.  This entails donning some glasses, and aiming for that "nerdy babe" look, and posing with the book (once it gets to production).  I know we have some female lieutenants and agents in the field that may not be nerds, but you can always pull off the motif if you want.

Anyway, contact the ole Captain if you're interested, send me a mailing address, you get free book, no money blah blah blah blah, men like to see cute girls instead of charts, blah blah blah blah, help inspire the real men with blah blah blah blah show leftists we have hotter women blah blah blah blah.

Sincerely,

Cappy

Your Everday, Average, Common Boss

Another excerpt from "Curse of the High IQ"


But the reason the entire country is forced to endure a daily commute on traffic-jammed roads is because instead of real leaders we have millions of compliant, obedient, and incredibly average bosses who are not intelligent enough to get past the third grade quandary of

“Well, if I can’t see you then how do I know you’re working?”

Alas, the entire country is held hostage by a bunch of Peter-Principled, MBA-laden idiot commoners because they don’t understand “telecommuting.”

Regardless, the example above highlights the difference between a REAL leader and your everyday, common boss.  A real leader, a real boss is trying to make genuine advancements and achievements to not only benefit the company, but himself, and society.  He or she looks beyond mere compliance and has a genuine intellectual interest in how to not only make things better, but dramatically better.  It is these types of bosses that high IQ people can work for in that your brain will be intellectually stimulated and challenged. 

Your average boss, however, comes nowhere near this.  He is usually so incompetent, so average, and so obedient their “leadership” strategies entail the same tiresome tactics that have never worked in the past 50 years:

Meetings
Motivational posters
Motivational speakers
More meetings
Corporate retreats
Meaningless plastic trinkets as rewards (Wells Fargo is a perfect example of this)
Meetings about meetings
Continuing Professional Education
And whatever other pablum endorsed by the latest “business management” books.

In short, you may not personally hate your boss.  He or she could be a great person.  But even if they are personable, you will at minimum be limited to their ability to lead and achieve.  And the truth is for every genuine leader that is out there, there’s a thousand everyday, average, incompetent bosses who don’t know they’re the butt-end of Dilbert’s Point-Haired Boss’ jokes. 

Nature vs. the "Social Scientists" in "What Women Want"

An excerpt from "Curse of the High IQ!"

Finally, the most common complaint I hear from my female clients under 40 is the lack of real, masculine men.  While pursuing the ideal of equal treatment of the sexes, various faux-intellectuals and hacks posing as “social scientists” have pushed beyond equal treatment under the law and now demand equal outcomes and equal…well…everything.

Anything men can do, women can do.
Applauding Bruce/Catlyn Jenner more than young girls majoring in engineering
Besmirching women for daring to want to be wives and moms.
“Gender is a social construct.”
Replacing “he” and “she” with “zhe” and “zhr.”
As well as the complete elimination of gender entirely.

This perilously ignores the teraflops of empirical data (not to mention fact) that men and women are different and that these differences cannot be erased no matter how hard you try. It also ignores the obvious point that these differences exist for some pretty damn good reasons and likely shouldn’t be trifled with. 

Men have penises, women have vaginas.  They are designed that way to breed children.  Women have breasts, produce milk, and are more nurturing.  They are designed that way to take care and nurture children.  Men have testosterone, are bigger, stronger, faster and (by some measures) smarter than women.  They are designed that way to provide for and protect their families.  And forget the obvious physiological differences.  Just look at the history of how men, women, and society have naturally organized themselves over the millennia across different cultures.  I find it very cute and adorable “social scientists” of the past 50 years think they know more than what nature has figured out over the past 2 million.

Still, the academic and political classes of society thought it best to trifle with these realities, blurring the lines of gender, which has ultimately resulted in pansified, emasculated men that no woman wants.  Yes, television says women want sensitive “90’s men.”  Yes, academia says men need to get in touch with their “emotions and inner-selves.”  And yes, even women say they want that bearded hipster with his red skinny jeans who writes poetry, works at the coffee shop, lives at home, and can’t afford a car.

But it’s almost as cute as “social scientists” thinking they know more than nature.

No matter what society, politicians, media, even women themselves say, their genes want a talk, rugged, strong, brilliant, charming, clever, brute of a man who can rock her world in bed and crush the skulls of any interloper who threatens her children.

The Grandfather Could Not Be Reached for Comment

Oh you fucking women thinking you don't need men and they can be replaced by government checks.  You fucking scum.

Again, #WasteHisTime2016 Is a Warning All Men Should Heed

Guest post whilst I bang away at the keyboard.

Western Women Don't Deserve the Protection of Western Men

McDonalds, Education, and Leftist Religion

Another from Alex.

Why are the Psychologists Psycho?

Couldn't help but post this.  

Doing my research on the psychological drawbacks of high intelligence and the article above is just precious.  Everytime they quote an psychologist or a "professor" in the field, they cannot help but also list all the problems they had in terms of suicide, bi-polar, etc.

I'm sorry, this profession is simply being undermined by its practitioners.

The Post Education Era

A guest post while I put the finishing touches on The Curse of the High IQ.

Study...Er Reality Finds Women Can't "Have It All"

Gen X women find out they can't have it all and that they were lied to by leftists and feminists.

Yaaaawn.  Crocodile tears.

Islam and Rape

Hilarious.

Trumbo: When the MSM Makes Movies About Themselves

Looks like another piece like The Pelican Brief where the daily media dregs need to make movies about themselves.

Libertarians Who Vote for Bernie Sanders

Um, dudes, you're NOT LIBERTARIANS!!!!!

How You Get Revenge

If a group of people came in and destroyed your country, destroyed your family, destroyed your life, and stole your future, your natural, mentally healthy reaction would be simple – revenge.  You would hunt those people down and kill them.  Unfortunately it wasn’t some roving band of post-apocalyptic bandits that did this to you, it was the electorate of the United States.  And unfortunately this electorate did it legally under a democracy.

Since this is a democracy, no matter how much damage the electorate causes, you have no recourse.  It doesn’t matter that it’s unlikely you’ll ever have a successful career, it doesn’t matter that it’s nearly impossible to start a family, it doesn’t matter you have no future.  By living in a democracy you agree to accept majority rule for better or worse.  Ideally this rule would be “better.”  The electorate figures things out, puts 2 and 2 together, and inevitably comes to the logical conclusion a minimal state and maximum freedom is the ideal form of government.  But as evidenced recently, the electorate is impaired, it’s ignorant, it’s naïve, and it’s brainwashed.  Consequently, the people not only get the government they deserve, the minority gets to unjustly suffer the consequences.

But what makes things particularly frustrating for the minority is one of forced-inaction.  Because this is a democracy any form of revenge or retaliation would be considered tyrannical or dictatorial.  The people have spoken, the majority got its way, opposing this would be hypocritically forcing the minority’s view on the majority.  Sadly this leaves Real Americans with no option but to sit and take it.  It also makes most of us feel helpless.  There’s no way to strike back, there’s no way to circumvent the consequences, there’s no way to turn the boat around.  There’s nothing we can do but futilely write letters to the editor or start blogs.  It is an issue of losing control over our futures and our lives, and there’s nothing we can do to avenge ourselves, let alone receive an ounce of recompense or justice.

However, things are not as hopeless as they first might seem.  There are legal measures you can take to exact your toll of revenge.  There are things you can do that will ensure your life is better than others.  And as it just so happens there are much more powerful forces at play that will deliver such a devastating blow of revenge against the people who destroyed the United States, that you could only dream of delivering such a blow.  The trick is to open your eyes to see it and savor it when it happens.


Future posts until I publish the new book will be excerpts from my previous works on account I want to finish it as quickly as possible, but not leave people lurching here.

What "#WasteHisTime2016" Tells Us About American Women

It's just mean, cruel, and disgusting, but it DOES shed an incredible amount of light on young American women today and just what a mine-field boys get to walk through.  It is VITAL if you have any young men in your family or circle of friends to show this to them.

HR and "People Skills"

An excerpt from the upcoming book/essay "Curse of the High IQ!"

The HR ditz also Introduces a new aspect of careers and the employment world.  One that is the bane of existence for abnormally intelligent people.

“Soft” or “people skills.”

In 2012 I had a job interview with a bank in Rapid City, South Dakota.  I had not been this excited in nearly a decade in that Rapid City and the Black Hills area is my favorite place in the world, and I was now looking at the prospects of finally living there with gainful employment. 

However, on my drive there I ran into the worst snow storm I have ever experienced in my life.  Scores of cars were stuck in the drifts, at least five semi-trailers were in the ditch, and invariably it got so bad they closed the interstate down.  It was only through some strategic driving, “piggy backing” off of semi-trucks to plow through the drifts, and raw determination did I manage to make it to Rapid City.  Unfortunately, I had not arrived until 4AM and only managed to get three hours sleep before my interview.  I walked into my interview a bit fatigued. 

The interview went very well and I even got the job in the end.  But after receiving the job offer my future boss called me and said,

“We need to talk about something.”

Curious as to what it was I returned his called and found out he had a concern.

“Well, I noticed when you walked into the interview you weren’t smiling.  You see, were here at the Rapid City Bank want to give our customers an experience.  And we need everybody to be smiling and happy to provide that warm welcoming environment.  But when you walked into our office you were frowning and that kind of demeanor can…”

I cut him off and told him I was no longer interested in the job.

Whether it’s a bank in South Dakota or a parking lot in Miami employers value “soft skills” or “people skills” more than real ones.  And the reason is very simple.  Normal and dumb people value feeling good over actual, genuine progress. 

A perfect example is Oprah Winfrey.

Criticize her as you may, Oprah is a genius because she realized people would rather feel good than actually achieve good in their lives.  And thus, she went out and told millions of women for over 20 years what they WANTED to hear, not what they NEEDED to hear. 

You’re not fat, you’re beautiful inside!
Your husband should love you for who you are!
Follow your heart and the money will follow!
You deserve it girl!

For this she was rewarded billions of dollars in net worth. 

The problem is high IQ people (unless they jettison their morals) simply can’t do this which puts them at a disadvantage in the employment world. 

First they cannot keep up the charade or façade of emotional interest.  It just isn’t in their nature and it’s simply too taxing mentally.  High IQ people can plainly see a problem for what it is, what logical decisions need to be made in order to solve it, and can remove any emotional or psychological preferences they might have about it.  They offer direct, blunt, emotionless solutions that are guaranteed to solve the problem, but unfortunately step on people’s precious little toes.

This then leads to a second problem, because not only does the majority of clients prefer good feelings over production, but so too does the majority of co-workers and bosses.  Your entire employment environment is driven by everybody’s insistence you place feelings and emotions over reality and truth.  This is simply maddening for smart people because what needs to be done in the real world counters what your boss, co-workers, and clients are demanding of you.

A colleague of mine worked at a video game store and was lectured for up-selling a client a $60 boxed-DVD set and NOT getting her to sign up for their “membership card.”

During my days in banking I was routinely lectured for being “too harsh” when analyzing and rejecting loans...until I was proven right when they all went into default and bankruptcy.

And no doubt you personally have experienced some instance of contradictory insanity in your own job where reality is telling you “X” and your boss is threatening to fire you if you don’t do “Y.”

It doesn’t matter.  Dumb and average people account for the majority of the customer base.  Dumb and average people also account for the majority of workers at your firm.  Thus, it is feelings and emotions that rule the day, guaranteeing you will suffer this cognitive-dissonance insanity during your entire career.

"Curse of the High IQ" is slated to come out in two weeks!  Tell friends!  Particularly the smart ones!

Why Most of Your Professors are Idiots

"The final price genuinely intelligent people will pay in college is dealing with those who aren’t.  Specifically, “faux-intellectuals.”  These are the idiots who aren’t intelligent, but since they’re on a college campus they desperately try to fake it.  They fall into two general camps.

Your professors

and

college graduates.

Like K-12 teachers, most professors are worthless, talentless hacks who couldn’t find jobs in the real world.  They typically hail from enough parental money (or student debt) that they managed to get a doctorate or masters in their field.  Unfortunately, most of the “faux-intelligent” professors majored in worthless subjects that required no intellectual rigor (the humanities, the liberal arts, etc.) so the only real place that will hire them is academia…to simply reteach what they learned 2-4 short years ago.  This means you are guaranteed to run into them as you’re forced to take their meaningless and pointless classes in “14th Century Lesbian Pygmy Sculpture” or “Diversity and Ethno-Centrism Privileged Studies.”

The problem is, very much like your teachers being the “adult,” you will assume your professors are smarter than you because…well…they’re “professors.”

Hogwash."

This is an excerpt from my upcoming book/essay "The Curse of the High IQ"

And yes, it is coming out that good.

Episode #127 of The Clarey Podcast

Western women voted in their own rape...and Cappy doesn't care
Why hasn't wireless boosted GDP?
Fan mail!

AND MORE!

In THIS EPISODE of The Clarey Podcast!

Related- At any point in time ladies you can call in Speirs.

The Father Could Not Be Reached for Comment

We don't need no STIIIIIINNNNNKIIINNNNNNGGGG fathers!!!!

How to Become a Successful Economist

Why the Economy Hasn't Collapsed Yet

Please forward and share because this really would advance and resolve some debates in economics:

Every Woman Who Ever Voted Democrat Ever

How Dennis Prager (Unintentionally) Hurts Young Men

Episode #127 of The Clarey Podcast

Cappy gets NO PITY from women when he claims he's sick and injured!
Real men can exchange racial jokes
Too many pussies in the Red Pill world
Cappy's favorite coffee mug
Percent of "Pansexuals" that are faking it.

in THIS EPISODE of THE CLAREY PODCAST!

***An interesting last segment where I inquire what percentage of people who are claiming to be "pan sexual" are merely just millennial leftoids faking it so they can belong to something.

"How Do I Math?"

The maths are hard.
Tee hee!  I'm a girl!
I just like working with children.
But aren't math numbers?  Why are their letters?
Tee hee!  I like the Kardashians!

Again, Before You Become a Doctor

The money is not worth the time.

Hooters Girls Worth More Than Feminists

A friend had posted this picture on the Facebook and while I originally had a good guffaw over it, the more I thought about it, the more I realized there is A LOT more going on that what first meets the eye.

1.  The Hooter's girl is employed.  That means she's working and contributing to society.  You may scoff at her profession or that she just got her job because of looks, but ask yourself this question.  What in the Patron Saint's Name of Frick is the feminist doing for work?  Protesting???  Holding signs???  Mock the Hooters girl all you want she is getting people to WILLINGLY hire her, not force taxpayers at the end of a gun to fork over grant money to create a never-needed make-work "job" for the vast majority of feminists.

2.  Their looks.  I've said it before and I'll say it again because it is VERY telling and insightful about leftists, but leftists tend to be uglier than righter leaning folk because staying in physical shape takes EFFORT.  And that is the whole principle leftists are against.  They are AGAINST hard work and effort.  Ergo, the CONSTANT rationalization of how they are entitled to other people's money.  Of course, unlike money looks cannot be transferred or redistributed, and thus the feminist is trying to "shame" people for liking girls prettier than she is.

3.  The free market never lies.  Sadly, ladies, whether you like it or not, the most valuable thing you have is your looks and youth.  This is because HALF the WORLD'S POPULATION (we call them "men") demand sex with pretty girls.  Doesn't mean they're going to get it, but it is the SINGLE MOST UNIVERSALLY DEMANDED COMMODITY IN THE WORLD.  More than oil.  More than gold.  Always has been. Always will be. 

The question is are you smart enough to capitalize on it?

This is why I have absolutely no qualms with prostitution, strippers, or simply women who keep themselves in shape demanding high-earning husbands.  It is also why I have quite a bit of respect for the likes of Chloe Luv, Mercedes Carerra, Jenna Jameson, and other women who work in the sex/porn industries.  It's not that they're hotties working in porn, but are serious entrepreneurs themselves knowingly capitalizing on this market.

The real issue is who is selfless and who is selfish in the picture above?  For that is the key lesson to learn about how to be financially successful.  You don't do what YOU want, you do what OTHER people want.  You deliver what they demand, not the other way around.

Ironically (though, perhaps not), the "dumb blond bimbo" knows more about economics and financial success than the doctorate in Women's Studies holding the sign.

"Financial Dominatrix"

Two points:

1.  Notice where a liberal arts degree will land your precious little daughters.
2.  She's one of the successful liberal arts graduates!!!

Review of The Big Short

Did a quick review of The Big Short.  Glorious Karl also did a review.

Curse of the High IQ and Campus Unfree Speech

Another bit of radio for your Christmas traveling.  Was on Kerry Lutz's show and we talked about the new book coming out (Curse of the High IQ) and what will happen when today's college kids enter politics and the judicial system!

Episode #126 of The Clarey Podcast

1970's claymation Christmas specials
Single moms ACTUALLY DO kill more than terrorists
Gen X fumbled the divorce ball
Naps are a conspiracy concocted by adults
"Overtired" is like "white privilege"

and MORE

in THIS EPISODE of The Clarey Podcast!

Stay Frosty Boys

Stay the freak frosty, but also DON'T GET SO THIRSTY YOU'RE AN IDIOT LIKE THIS MAN!!!

What Would Happen to the Federal Deficit If Interest Rates Increased?

A big, and legitimate, concern is that the monstrous US debt is at such a low interest rate, what would happen to the interest payments of the federal government were to bump up just a little bit?  What if they were at historical norms?  What if they were to reflect the creditworthiness of the actual government?

Never fear!  Cappy's here!

So the ole Captain went online because he couldn't sleep and dusted off his ole Excel skills Downloaded some data series and went to work.  And it's basically what you'd expect.

I ran two different scenarios.  One where the average interest rate on federal debt was 4%.  I chose this because that's what it's been historically and would provide us a good "control" variable.  I also chose 8% because if I was a lender that is the MINIMUM I would demand for a bankrupt, insolvent POS like the US federal government.  And here are the results.

Under 4%

As you would expect artificially low rates that the federal reserve charges the federal government has understated what would have normally been our national deficit.  During the crisis and the "recovery" we could have expected to shell out an additional $200 billion a year on average during Obama's entire presidency.  This would have naturally added to the debt, further increasing deficits, but I was too lazy to calculate that.

Of course, this isn't the New York Times, this is Captain Capitalism.  An actual reputable source for journalism.  So like all good journalists we know that we should convert this to deficits as a % of GDP.

This gives us a bit better perspective showing we'd still be running deficits around 4% GDP had the creditors of the US federal government had the slightest bit of self-respect and demanded more than .000035% interest on their bonds.  Let us be clear.  It is only the shenanigans of the central bank and the fact that foreigners are even "more sucky" than the US that the federal government can get away with paying such a paltry level of interest.

Finally, what if the federal government was in the real world and did not hold the world's reserve currency?  Well, I would at minimum charge an interest rate of 8%.  Truth is, I would never lend to an entity in as bad of financial shape as the US government.  But let's just humor ourselves and assume 8%.  Well, shucks howdy!

What I like about this chart is it really shows you how the interest rate wouldn't have mattered until 2000, especially, since the financial crisis.  If there was any sanity in the bond market, the federal government would be running deficits of nearly $2 trillion each year since 2009.  That would be an absolutely unsupportable 11% GDP deficit for 7 years running.  Obviously, this added debt would be added to the total debt and creditors would have stop lending to us long ago.  But let this be a lesson to the LUCK, not SKILL that has spared the US a fate like Greece, Spain, or Japan.  It is ONLY because we have the world's reserve currency that we avoided this mess and it has nothing to do with Obama, the federal reserve, Paul Krugman or any other idiot claiming responsibility for this "recovery."

The Father Could Not Be Reached for Comment

The story is developing, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and say, "the father was not available for comment."

Sick and in Bed

Sorry all, but came down with a nasty cold that I have not been able to kick.  Posts are going to be a little slow which is just as well given it is Christmas season.

"F is for Family" Review

A "tad" more drama, familial abuse, anger, hatred, and "cartoon porn" than I really was expecting.

Episode #125 of The Clarey Podcast!

Do dogs prove god exists?
Why SJW's waste their lives
Le Cordon Bleu closes down
If you're a single mom going to culinary school, nothing good happens.

AND MORE!

In THIS EPISODE of The Clarey Podcast!

Awww, That's Too Bad

Le Cordon Bleu, the fakest of the fake schools is closing it's doors in Minnesota.

Rich White Liberal Trust Funders Have to Live Somewhere

I love how they say, "gentrification can sometimes displace long time residents of a neighborhood."

The neighborhood is improving.
Housing prices are going up.
Crime is going down.
Said residents were no doubt PAID for their properties.

But no, the leftist virus infects journalism majors and they HAVE TO just find something bad about inner cities improving.

Project Cuckservative

Hello All,

Working on a new project.  But I need a list of the top cuckservatives in the US.

Right now my list includes:

Chief Justice Roberts
John Boehner
Jim Jeffords
Arlen Specter

Any others would help.  Please list below in the comments.

Thank you,

Cappy

For Your Late Night Listening Pleasure

"After the Drop" from MOH

There's Nothing Wrong With Declining Populations

One of the biggest lies or canards of the left is that we need to import immigrants because if we don't our population will be in decline.  And since the word "decline" has a negative connotation with it, the sheeple sop it up thinking it is a fate that must be avoided at all costs.

The problem is, as with many of the left's assumptions, is that there is nothing inherently wrong with a declining population.  Sure, in the tribal days you would like your tribe to be bigger and therefore stronger than the other tribes, but since society no longer operates on the premise that "big" is always "better" the growth rate (positive or negative) of a population is moot.

Now of course I will be forced to waste the intelligent and intellectually honest people's time and provide the caveat to address the incredibly predictable claim that RAPID declines in population due to war, famine, plague, or communism are indeed bad.  However, what I am talking about here (as this is where the focus of the political debate is) is the primarily western world's inability to get their birth rate at or above the replacement rate, which therefore guarantees an ever-growing population.

First a slowly declining population is nothing to worry about.  It doesn't mean you'll go extinct as people will always be willing to fornicate.  And it doesn't mean the economy will collapse as there are less people the economy needs to support.  Ergo, the focus should not be nominal economic growth, but rather the key and infinitely more important variable, GDP per capita.  What are the standards of living the individual person is enjoying.  Ergo, lets say Japan's economy shrinks an enormous 25% in the next 50 years.  That's great if its population shrinks 50% because those people who remain just saw an enormous increase in their standards of living.

Second, logic would dictate that if a declining population is "bad" then a booming population is "good."

Oh really?

Like how the 2.8 billion people in China and India are all living at first world standards of living?
Like how Hispanics and Blacks have the highest birthing rates and (shock of shocks) also suffer the lowest standards of living in the US?
And let's not forget that sociologist's, SJW's, and social worker's utopian eugenics/socialist experiment dream come true - Africa.  Yep, because we all know with Africa's booming population they're enjoying nothing but increased standards of living on par with Switzerland.

Sorry, it's just not true, increasing populations WITHOUT commensurate or better economic growth just means increased poverty, suffering, and strife.

The truth is the left has ulterior motives for increasing the population perpetually.  And it has nothing to with the unfounded concerns that "population decline is bad mmmkay?"

First, (though not leftist) companies and corporations want a perpetually increasing population so people buy more stuff.  Nothing wrong with that on account purchasing and enjoying material things in life is part of goal of economics.  But let's be clear, corporations and companies don't care if it's sustainable in the long run or if it's in the best financial interests of the population.  This is why we have slowing economic growth, but booming debts.  People are willing to borrow to pay for what they can't afford today.  This not only boosts consumer spending (which profits companies), but it slows long term economic growth because said monies are NOT going into investments.  Again, though not specifically leftists, this goal has nothing to do with preventing the "horrors" of a declining population, but is merely corporations trying to beat the previous quarters EPS.

Second, very much like how the private sector needs perpetual (though unsustainable) growth to increase their profits, the entire socialist economic/government system the left has installed in the US (and west) depends on future hosts for today's parasites.  What I love the most is how the left tells people right to their face "Well we need future children to afford the social programs like social security and medicare!"

Really?

Shouldn't something in your brain be going off saying "Well where the hell did the old people's SS contributions go?  Why is it behooved upon the youth to pay for the elderly?"

Of course, Westerners have become idiotic sheeple and just blindly agree saying, "Well yeah!  We need more population growth in the future to afford all this sh!t we want to buy ourselves today!"  But for those of us with half a brain we realize this is an admission and proof that the socialist's government/economic system is unsustainable and needs to parasite off of the future to make it SEEM like it's working today.  Ergo, to keep up the facade they import as many new immigrants as possible with the the hope they'll be the willing slaves that will pay the taxes to support them in their old age (when in reality they don't produce anything as much as they parasite on welfare and other social programs making it laughable they will become the economic juggernaut that will make good on all those government IOU's and social welfare promises).

Third, perpetually increasing asset prices.

Since our entire retirement system is based on capital gains in the stock market, we need to, in theory, increase not only the demand for companies' goods and services (therefore driving up prices), but we need more purchasers of said assets to drive these prices up.   This not only plays out in the stock market, but especially so in real estate in that more people directly drive up the rents and value of land.

But imagine if the population was declining.  What would happen to asset prices?

Well stocks would tank, as would commodity prices, not to mention real estate.  And since nearly every pension, trust fund, and American's 401k is dependent upon those prices why we just can't afford to have those drop now can we?  So let's import a bunch of people who hate our guts and want to kills us, or at least live off of us, so our precious little government pensions and IRA accounts stay fully funded.

And finally, the blatant and painfully obvious attempt to stack the voting bloc deck with parasitic immigrants who will vote left because "welfare."  Do not be fooled thinking the left is being charitable of kind.  They couldn't care less about the immigrants just as they couldn't care less about the black community.  They view and use these people as pawns in their political game to remain in political power, thereby avoiding any real work, suffering, or strife in life.

So the next time you have some idiot sociologist, politician, or leftist talk about the "horrors" of a declining population, please show them this little post, tell them they are a liar, and then tell them to have a cup of STFU.
________________________________
http://aaron-clarey.podomatic.com/
http://www.assholeconsulting.com
https://www.youtube.com/user/AaronClarey
https://twitter.com/aaron_clarey
http://www.amazon.com/Aaron-Clarey/e/B00J1ZC350/
Amazon Affiliate

Cos Strikes Back

Hmmmm....a multimillionaire man with very limited life expectancy left, with nothing left to lose, and you painted him into a corner.  Hmmmm....I wonder what he's going to do.

The Real Aim of Islam

"Islam is not like any other religion. Islam is a supremacist racist political and social ideology wrapped in a thin peel of religious rituals. It seeks domination and supremacy over all other systems and religions."

Never mind, she only lives there.

A Capitalist in Havana

Kerry Lutz visits Havana just to see it for himself.

Can't Sleep Cappy Podcast Extra

Computer genius Cappy
Women hate short men
Getting stuck in politics and ideology
MGTOW and Feminism, one and the same
Why Puerto Rico sucks
Working the overnight

And more in this "CAN'T SLEEP CAPPY" PODCAST EXTRA

And also an interview I had with Crush the Street about Islam, terrorism, feminism, and other politically correct topics.

The Best Offshore Banks

New sponsor and one I intend on reading once the fiscal year is over:

More SJW Racial Problems for Star Wars

So short story, this Chinese poster for Star Wars has come out and look who is NOT as prominently displayed on the poster?






































I'm surprised with his adamance that Star Wars be a multicultural unicorn fart JJ Abrahms is letting this fly...oh wait...that's right, money trumps race in leftist land.

Episode #123 of The Clarey Podcast - "Can't Sleep Cappy" Edition

Can't sleep Cappy is sick
Standards for "hero"
Batman must have safety testedt he hell out of his equipment
Please, just give up Apple products
Basic Guaranteed income won't work in the US
Cappy debates a feminist (sort of)
Michelle Obama is hot

In THIS EPISODE of The Clarey Podcast

For You Late Night Viewing Pleasure

Why the Term "Racist" No Longer Means Anything

Many years ago because of my political affiliation it was a fear of mine that although untrue, the mere accusation of "racism" would have far and wide reaching consequences for my career and future.  Combine that with the internet and the fact any future employers could look me up, it made me doubly careful to demonstrate I was not a racist and did indeed hold all people to the same standard.

Of course, deep down inside we all knew being called a "racist" or a "sexist" was nothing more than a cowardly tactic by leftists with precisely that intent.  To taint and paint anybody who advocated free markets, capitalism, freedom and treating people as genuine equals as a racist because it would divert people's attention from the left's ultimate lack of solutions.  Ergo, instead of debating you on the merits of hard work, merit, equal opportunity, but not equal outcome, it is simply easier for the cowards to yell "racist" and hope the fear of doxxing or your employers finding out would shut you up.

No longer...well at least not for much more.

For just as sure as the laws of physics, the laws of economics will (if they haven't already) render the accusation of "racism" moot, pointless, obsolete, even the complete opposite - make it a badge of honor.

It's quite simple.  To make the accusation of racism "damning" and effective it has to be true.  And since the vast majority of conservatives, libertarians and other right-leaning people are not in fact racist, you would think you would reserve this four-letter word for only the rare times it applies.  But instead of using it as a descriptive word, the left has relied on it all too often as a political strategy to compensate for their lack of substance, progress, and solutions.  So now, if you are against affirmative action (which is by definition racist) you're

racist.

Want to get rid of quotas?

Racist.

Hold blacks to the same standards as white?

Racist.

Want to keep your own money?

Racist.

Don't believe minorities are held down and are instead pampered?

Racist.

Want lower taxes?

Racist.

You don't even have to believe in or take a stance on something racial.  You merely have to be white and then you are immediately, but unconsciously guilty of the academian-inspired poppy cock of

"privilege" or "institutional racism."

But soon, with all these baseless accusations of racism two things happen.

One, the market is flooded with so many accusations of racism, by the laws of economics each individual accusation means increasingly less.  In the 1980's if you were called a racist it meant something.  But today, especially with the brainwashed, college-indoctrinated millennials blaming everything from flatulence to paper cuts on "racism" it means nothing.  It has become so common to be accused of an "ism" it is now part of the American psyche and it has lost all of its sting.

Two, it exposes the accusers of their true nature.  People flinging around accusations of "isms" and "ists" are not "noble, moral people trying to wipe out the scourge of bigotry, allowing for the American ideal of merit, individualism, and judging people by their accomplishments."  They are, quite frankly, despicably evil and disgusting people.

The dipshittery that went on at the University of Missouri (not to mention all of American universities) is nothing more than power hungry millennial psychopaths who cowardly hide their despotic desires (not to mention their true racism) behind the color of their skin. 

Black Lives Matters is nothing more but the same, with the added agenda of thinking themselves superior as they demand to be above the law.

Advocates for affirmative action, reparations and the welfare state?  Nothing more than thinly veiled thieves, once again cowardly hiding behind their gender, color of skin, or ethnicity to demand other people sacrifice their lives and money for them.

And politicians/media types who dare you not to critique the "refugees" or Islam for San Bernadino, lest you be called a racist, and instead demand you make yourself less safe by forfeiting your guns?  True bigots against Western Civilization who hate you and want you dead (and yes, that means our Mr. Unicorn President). 

In short, the demands of these race-whores and pimps have become so arrogant and blatant even the most brainwashed leftist or cowardly-compliant-please-don't-accuse-me-of-racism cuckservative can see through them.

We're supposed to enslave ourselves financially to minorities?
We're supposed to pay for everything for them?
We're supposed to be born with the "original and unforgivable sin" of privilege and institutional racism?
We're supposed to be accepting of affirmative action because it's "good racism" because it's against us?
We're supposed to resign dean positions in schools because "whitey."
We're supposed to tolerate mandatory classes of indoctrination in our schools?
And
We're supposed to give up our lives and country as we let people into our country that hate us and want to kill us, lest we be called racist?

I know there's a lot of pussies in this country, and you leftists are used to running roughshod over them.  But frankly, fuck off.  I, along with increasingly more people aren't going to tolerate this attempt to enslave us, and in some cases, outright kill us.  And no matter what new and innovative ways academia concocts as to how I'm "privileged," and no matter how compliant the media is in brainwashing the sheeple to believe it, and no matter what the politicians say or demand of me, in the end it's all lies.  It's not true.  And the real evil is all you cowards who can't come up to me like a decent, respectable robber and say to my face,

"Give me your money or else."

Still, while to me and millions of others the accusation of racism no longer means anything, the fear of this accusation will still carry weight at least for a little while longer even though everybody knows it's bunk because of two things:

1.  Corporate employers are still too cowardly and fearful of being accused of racism.  Their lips are too firmly attached to the ass of political correctness.  CSR, diversity training, sensitivity training, HR departments, etc., far too much effort, energy and resources have been invested by corporate America in the hopes of staving off accusations of discrimination.  Additionally, "diversity" has become the "strategy de'jour" of corporations and MBA programs across the country as their business leaders lack any genuine innovation, intelligence, capabilities, or leadership.  Ergo, if you are employed by one of these mindless ass-sucking institutions you need to play ball, admit you're a dirty, filthy racist and lecher, or lose your job, if not your career.

2.  Debt.

Debt enslaves people to be good wage slaves and stooges.  Want that new car?  You need that car loan!  Want that college experience?  You need those student loans?  Want a house?  Well you need a mortgage for that!

And so (and I want all corporate employers and HR ladies in America to know this), even though nearly every single corporate employee out there wants nothing more than to walk into his boss' office with the HR lady in there and slash both your throats, the only thing holding them back is that they are indeed slaves to the job as they need to get out of debt.  Which by default means they can't speak their mind on the internet and tell the race whores to fuck off, and worse, must endure the childishly mockery of "diversity" and "sexual harassment training" you force upon them.

But there is hope.

For you see, while self-employed people like me are immune to accusations of racism (heck, we profit off of it), there's a trend indicating soon your average wage slave will also be as well.  And there's nothing you corporate employers, you power-hungry HR/CSR bints, or tyrannical government bureaucrats can do about it.

Because once people no longer have that chain of debt around their ankles, and don't need that job any more, they're going to feel a lot more free to truly speak their mind.  And that's the magic moment when the people admit the emperor has no clothes and your little "race-whore-racket" is over.  And then your worst nightmare comes true - you're actually treated as an equal and forced to work a real job like the rest of us.

Enjoy the decline.
___________________________________

http://aaron-clarey.podomatic.com/
http://www.assholeconsulting.com
https://www.youtube.com/user/AaronClarey
https://twitter.com/aaron_clarey
http://www.amazon.com/Aaron-Clarey/e/B00J1ZC350/
Amazon Affiliate

The Leftists Eat Another One of Their Own

How's that "Early Childhood Education Degree" working for you now Ms. Guaranteed to Vote Democrat All the Time?

New iTunes Link for The Clarey Podcast

Good news commie-Apple-Hates-America iPhone heroin addicts Apple users, The Clarey Podcast has been successfully moved on iTunes.  You can subscribe to the NEW feed here.

Dear English Teachers, Please Don't Give Career Advice

Just had to share this Asshole Consulting request.

The 11th grade English teacher of a client told him his pursuit of becoming a dental hygienist was pointless because it wasn't a 4 year degree.  I looked up median salaries for English teachers vs. dental hygienists and the dental hygienists make $20,000 a year more than English teachers.

Western Civilization is in the Hands of Women...Heaven Help Us

Confusion

If you are a sane, normal person, void of OTC drugs and other mind altering substances, an increasingly frequent phenomenon you may have noticed is one where (typically) leftist women are the victims of their own rabid endorsement of multiculturalism.

The rapes in Sweden can be disproportionately blamed on women voting left.
The rape rings in the UK, same thing.
Refugee rape in Germany, again, women's bleeding hearts resulting in leftist policies that brought them there.
And particularly confusing is when activist women (no doubt of the leftist stripe) are raped or sexually assaulted but refuse to report it because they love their political ideology/religion more than they hate being raped. 

It is confusing because to those of us with just average intelligence (not to mention, self-respect) we can't understand why women vote to ruin their lives, home countries, and economies, not to mention are so wedded to their leftist politics they would rather be raped and enslaved than betray their commitment to multiculturalism.

Now there are many possible explanations for this self-hating, self-destructive behavior.  Perhaps these women deep down inside hate Western Civilization so much they'd rather be raped, and maybe even view that as fighting "evil white male, Eurocentric patriarchy."  Perhaps these people are cowards, see the writing on the wall, know Western Civilization won't make it, and kowtow like cuckolds to what they perceive to be their future overlords.  Maybe it's crusaderism combined with the allure of bad boys, prompting young girls to join ISIS even if it means their inevitable death.  Or perhaps, deep down inside it's nothing more than good ole fashioned "rape fantasies" influencing the way they vote.

The truth is, it doesn't matter.  Because no matter which way you slice it, it simply boils down to...

Betrayal.

Betrayal

Regardless of the reason women vote to destroy themselves and Western Civilization, it doesn't change the fact that they just simply do.  The rest of us must accept and adapt to this fact.  And call it "democracy," call it "women's suffrage," call it "empowerment," it's nothing more than a euphemism for "betrayal."  And the reason it is betrayal is because women are (disproportionately) voting for two key things that go against Western Civilization:

1.  Socialism
2.  Multiculturalism

When it comes to socialism I've covered this before, but women, in general vote for more state control.  They vote for socialism.  And while many of them do so out of the naivety of "it's to help the poor/children/old/etc.," it is is a slap in the face to the immeasurable and ultimate price millions of people paid to bring Western Civilization about.  Quite simply, the history of the world has been a horrible and costly struggle to free people from the tyranny of government.  Going back to the warlord tribal chieftains, to the theocracies falsely claiming to represent "god," to the fiefdoms where the "king" was supported by a slave class of serfs, to wars waged against slavery and nazism, hundreds of millions of lives were wasted, destroyed, committed, and dedicated to bringing about a limited republic permitting the people to govern themselves.  And women (along with some cowardly little men), in a short 60 years of spoiled-brat-laden feminism have been able to undo what took about 4,000 years to create.  It is arguably the single largest setback to human advancement since the bubonic plague. 

When it comes to multiculturalism, here women's naivety betrays us all again.  With child-like thinking "I feel the democrats/left/labor is for the little guy" they consciously vote in socialism, while unconsciously inviting the Dracula of "Multiculturalism" into our homes.  And this is not necessarily bad if you consider cultures conducive and generally on board with the base principles of Western Civilization.  Asians, East Indians Europeans, etc.  These are peoples and cultures generally for freedom, innovation.  Even self-respecting, independent minded individuals from other non-western-compliant cultures reject their original cultures, demand better, and become doctors, dentists, physicists, entrepreneurs, etc. (for example no doubt many of you know of an Iranian who escaped Ayatollah Khomeini to lead a successful life here).  But to wholesale out the best thing on this planet in the pursuit of marxism and multiculturalism by importing those who not only refuse to participate in Western Civilization but

go on welfare
commit terrorist attacks
and advocate Sharia law over the constitution

is tantamount to treason.

But these two specific acts that would make Judas jealous are further steeped in a general stew of betrayal that plagues Western Civilizatoin.  And that is one where women have replaced fathers and husbands with government programs and checks.  And in doing so (admittedly, likely unconsciously) killed the engine of economic growth and innovation that made Western Civilization great.  They took away men's reason for living.  They took away their purpose and agency in life.  They gave them nothing more to live for than merely to be the hosts to parasites they themselves have become, not to mention the new ones they constantly invite in.  And thus they have immobilized men.

When you take the fact women are voting to undo all that men have worked for

and

are voting to bring in other cultures that want to kill, parasite off of, or just plain destroy Western Civilizatoin

and

won't report getting raped by the enemy because "diversity"

but

WILL make false rape accusations against Western men because "patriarchy"

precisely how many knives do you plan to impale into the backs of Western men before they give up?

Of course this is already happening.   Men are postponing marriage.  Men are also majoring in increasingly worthless fields.  Consequently they are also unable to earn the money necessary to start a family.  Which is alright, seeing most women don't want to start a family until they're 43, if that.  The result, however, is (hilariously) what young women complain the most about today.  That there aren't any "real men" around any more as they're all too busy looking at porn and playing video games while living at home with their parents (perhaps that's the underlying Freudian reason women don't protest too much about all these "Syrian" "refugees" being young, fighting age men, as well as seem reluctant to report it when they're getting raped by them.)  Regardless,  how can you blame them?  The men of society (as well as some women) are so deterred by having no country, culture, family or agency worth living for, it has resulted in an increasing catatonic state that explains why economic growth has been tanking since we started replacing them with the government.
 
Just One Problem

While no doubt many real men, not to mention many real women are infuriated by this betrayal, what's worse is the utter helplessness they feel. Most likely you too have felt this helplessness as your brain evaluates all your options, thinking, hoping there's something, anything you can do to help save this country and turn it around.

Perhaps you could write a blog?
Maybe you'd start a political campaign?
Maybe you yell into the internet via a YouTube channel?
Write your congressman?
What about forming a militia?

But if there's a bit of practicum to this post it's that you should not concern yourself with these things.  There is nothing you can do.

Understand that since we have devolved into a democracy it is the majority rules.  And while there has always been a percentage of men who were idiots, voting to undo what their forefathers desperately fought for, women (be it nature, biology, feminism, hate, ignorance or what have you) consistently vote for socialism and tyranny.  This makes the American (and Western Civilization) voting blocs fatedly leftist, guaranteeing a slow, but inevitably slouch towards socialism and the fringe benefits of multiculturalism, thought police, CSR, and political correctness that comes with it.  You may be tempted to think about resorting to violence, perhaps even starting a second American revolution, but what would the point be?  Western voters ARE getting EXACTLY what they voted for, and you would actually be the tyrant trying to force a minority view on the majority.  Alas, your hands are tied in nearly every capacity as the people simply want none of it.

The key is to let go and simply enjoy the life you have.  You cannot control that the participants of Western Civilization want to commit suicide.  You cannot convince the brainwashed Millennials about the risks of government debt.  You cannot convince women that happiness is not in their careers or a government check, but in family and loved ones.  You cannot convince porn addicted, video game-playing, red jean wearing hipster "men" about the merits of being manly.  And you certainly can't convince leftist women whose hatred for Western Civilization is so great, they'd prefer to be raped by the scum they let in.

It is the end of Western Civilization and these people will CERTAINLY get theirs in the end.  But for those of you who are sane, have a bit of morality left about you, and want to make the most of your time on this planet before you pass away, may I strongly recommend you enjoy the decline instead of fretting over it?
___________________________________________

Visit Aaron at his other sites:
Asshole Consulting
The Clarey Podcast

Why Debts and Deficits DO Matter

The Father Could Not Be Reached for Comment

We don't need no stiiiinnnnnking fathers!!!

This Weekend

Remember to do your Christmas shopping through Cappy's ole Amazon affiliate program.

Episode #122 of The Clarey Podcast!

"He's got a face for podcasting"
Beautiful baby boomer women
What fedoras are and are NOT
The window of marriageable girls 16-19
Never marry women who hate lingerie
There's a reason the "one" got away
Dating a feminists's daughter
Do ghetto blacks have, let alone think of 401k's or IRA's?

and MORE!

in THIS EPISODE of The Clarey Podcast!

Rant of the Day

Millennials are cry babies and the rest of the world is sick of it.

"Muh Feelz" Uber Alles: Aka "I Just Solved Philadelphia's Poverty Problem"

A very real paradox I face is one where I can either sell the truth or sell lies.

Selling the truth has merits unto itself.  It's true, it will help advance society, and it is such a rare commodity that if you're willing to suffer the slings and arrows of the PC-Nazi's, media, death threats, doxxing, and general hate of the leftist population, you can charge a hefty premium for it because so few purveyors offer it.

However, whereas truth is in very short supply, the demand for lies outstrips any shortage of it.  And thus, while I could be one of the few suppliers of truth, there is an INFINITELY larger market for lies.  Only so many people demand a book on "male lifetime financial management."  Or a book about the hazards of worthless degrees.  But MILLIONS of women will fork over money for lies telling them how "big is beautiful."  And MILLIONS of men will fork over BILLIONS to have a web cam girl put on a show "just for them."  Additionally, in telling people lies you don't get death threats, "strikes" against your YouTube channel, or accusations of racism.  Matter of fact you are generally loved by the sheeple masses of the world and likely elected to become president.

So tell me again why they hell would you do something as stupid as market the truth?

Alas, I am increasingly tempted to become like Oprah.  Why work hard, doing economic research, mathematics, statistical analysis, and deep, thorough testing of logic to highlight and warn people about the real world threats that exist and could destroy their lives to simply "make ends meet?"  When I could:

Tell women they're great no matter what
Become a Harlequin romance author
Lie to youth telling them to follow their heart and the money will follow
Or advocate some leftist-ordained political cause

and make BILLIONS in the process?

Of course there is a moral answer and then the Machiavellian answer.  But regardless of which one I choose (perhaps both down the road), while debating this paradox I happened upon what is arguably one of the most important epiphanies in my life.  One that if understood by more would help not only advance the political debate we are having in this nation, but perhaps even solve it, raising millions out of poverty.  And that is "feelings" is the most powerful force in the world.

AKA "Muh feelz uber alles."

I happened upon this discovery while driving down Broad Street in the worst town I've ever driven through, Philadelphia.  And I'm not joking.  Philadelphia is hands down the worst town I ever drove through.  The reasons are multiple.

First, the town was built in the 1600-1700's meaning its streets were designed for horses, not trucks from Wisconsin.  This would be moot if they had leveled the old houses and replaced them with new ones, but alas, the "historic district" on the south east side of Philly is VERY nice, but nearly impossible to drive through.  Chicago, though more populous, is a JOY to drive through by comparison as the great Chicago fire leveled the old town, so it could be rebuilt during the dawn of the automobile.

Second, you just have too many damn people in too small of a space (but nobody there ever leaves Philly because they don't have cars and don't know about the "outside world")

But what really connected the dots and make me come to my epiphany was Broad Street.

Due to traffic I had head north and then come back down south to DT Philly via Broad Street.  Unbeknownst to me however, this was the "ghetto."  And while at first it just seemed like any ole regular run down part of a major metro down, as I approached Temple University it got worse

and worse

and even worse.

So bad was Broad Street that it made the South Side of Chicago and parts of Detroit look clean, and definitely preferable.  However, it wasn't the people or donks blaring rap music that made it so bad.  It was the state of disrepair the neighbodhood was in.

There were burned out buildings that had not been demolished or taken down.  There was garbage blowing in the street because people were littering constantly.  Worse, there were garbage bags just laying out in the open, both on the side walks and the streets.  And finally there was the occasional guy just sleeping in an abandoned lot or out in the open at 11AM.

In other words it wasn't the crime, or the graffiti, or the drugs that made it so bad.  It was the painfully blatant fact that the people of north Philly plain don't give enough of a f@ck to even clean up their own neighborhood.  They were walking, living, and sleeping in filth.  Shoot, even some businesses were still open in buildings that were partially burnt down.  It was no different than a 2nd or 3rd world hovel where you could just tell the people were so lazy, so dispirited they could not even do the most basic of things and simply clean up after themselves.

Now, no doubt anybody with an ounce of intellectual honesty and two brain cells can point to the primary cause of this.  Only the socialist policies of a city and neighborhood ran by democrats for the past 60 years can wreak this much havoc and devastation IN SPITE of receiving what is no-doubt billions in aid and taxpayer monies.  But what got me and made me realize this very important aforementioned epiphany is just what utterly deplorable and low standards of living these people tolerated.  And not just tolerated, but have been tolerating for decades.  Why would anybody, in the United States, when you can move anywhere you want, do whatever you want, endure this for a second, let alone decades?

It became apparent to me there was a VERY powerful force KEEPING them there. And that force was "their feelz."

The truth is residents of north Philly CHOOSE this outcome.  At any point in time they can move OR they can improve themselves.

How can they improve themselves?

Well, they can stop having kids out of wedlock.  They can stop having kids they can't afford.  They can stop committing crime. They can get good grades in K-12 and then go to college for STEM or the trades (Temple U is right there).  They can set down the booze and drugs and instead open up businesses.

Oh, and they can pick their shit up off the streets.

In short, it is not "whitey" holding them down or "patriarchy" or "evil republicans" making them leave garbage bags in the street.

It's their own damn fault.

But herein lays the problem.

I just literally solved north Philadelphia's poverty problem.  At any point in time the community can pursue a path of excellence, achievement, hard work, and entrepreneurship.  They could, if they wanted to, make Beverly Hills look like a ghetto.  And heck, if they did that, I would have just obsoleted the entire "social work" and "sociology" industries and fields.  But the problem is I committed the cardinal sin. I told them the truth.  And the truth "hurtz their feelz."  And remember...

"Muh feelz uber alles."

So strong is the power of feelings that millions would rather live in a shithole like north Philly than endure the minute or two of pain a truthful constructive criticism would provide.  Worse, even though in the long (heck, medium) run said painful truths would GREATLY improve their lives (if acted upon), they still will rebuke it because "muh feelz."  Alas, feelings (and consequently ego and pride) are such powerful forces, people would rather live in poverty, wasting their one and finite precious lives than hear the truth that would help them and set them free.  It makes you wonder if gravity is indeed the most powerful force in the universe. 

But as bad as this is it gets worse.  For the second part of my epiphany was one of true Machiavellian darkness. 

As it stands right now, we assume the likes of the left, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, the democrats, labor parties, Oprah, feminists, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, professors, academians, and the entire stew of socialists advocate what they do either for charitable purposes, altruistic purposes, racial purposes, political purposes, or even purposes of hate and revenge.

But what if they came to this exact same epiphany I did ages ago?  What if the ruling elite knew "muh feelz" was the most powerful force in the world?  And worse, what if they amorally capitalized on it, KNOWINGLY lying to people simply so they could advance themselves?  You, me, and everybody else we know were steeped in a life philosophy of hard work, freedom, independence, and morality this idea may seem novel (as well as abhorrent).  But what if great grand father Clinton or the heads of the Ivy League knew people's feelings were the most powerful force on the planet, and simply pass on this hush-hushed wisdom that "to advance in society, lie to people, sell them down the river and blame other people.  Feelings and ego are so powerful, as long as you provide a scapegoat, the masses will support you?"

It would certainly explain a lot of what we see.

Of course my own personal opinion is that it varies from politician to celebrity to trust fund baby.

I truly believe Obama's motives are not based in profiting off of people's "feelz" but revenge and a genuine hatred of America and racism.

I truly believe Bernie Sanders is a true believer and is completely unconscious of how his policies directly result in north Philly being a shit hole.

But when it comes to the likes of Hillary, Oprah, Sharpton, feminists, the women's fashion industry, and the legions of spineless deans and professors in Academia there is no doubt in my mind these disgusting and vile people have no problems ruining the lives of millions all so they can profit off of it.

All I ask is for the citizens of north Philly and those who are perpetually "offended" by criticism is to

stop
look at your neighborhood
ask if you deserve better
and entertain the theory that it is not the democrats' policies that are helping you

but are precisely what is keeping you down.
_________________________________________
http://aaron-clarey.podomatic.com/
http://www.assholeconsulting.com
https://www.youtube.com/user/AaronClarey
https://twitter.com/aaron_clarey
My Books
Amazon Affiliate

Ah Felicia Follum

You sweet, innocent, cute girl you:

How the Average American Can Deal with Jihad in America

I Was Going to Bet Crazy White Guy

But apparently it's just members of the religion of peace.

New Comic Added

Merc Works.

Ho Ho Ho!

Remember kids, all of Cappy's books make great holiday gifts!

Nothing says, "I Love You" more than destroying your childrens' (unattainable) dreams with Worthless, Enjoy the Decline, Bachelor Pad Economics, and other Cappy literary works!

Also, remember to do all your Christmas (and life time) purchases via the Captain's online Amazon Affiliate program.  If you don't know how, simply click here and start shopping, it's that easy (make sure your ad blocker is off).

Best!

Cappy

Why I Only Protect Those Close to Me

And never open doors for women I don't personally know or hail from the WWII generation.

Why Women Crying is a Manipulation Tactic that Should Be Ignored

From a woman no less.

It's So Nice to Have a Wolf Around the House

Thanks to the wonders of the internet I was able to find an old cartoon special from my childhood.  It's titled "It's So Nice to Have a Wolf Around the House" and while funny when we were children, it is HILARIOUS as well as charming for adults.  If you have any children, I recommend watching the two parts (about 7 minutes each).  You will not regret it: